{"id":2580,"date":"2020-10-26T20:48:04","date_gmt":"2020-10-26T20:48:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/petersantilli.com\/?p=2580"},"modified":"2020-10-26T21:13:56","modified_gmt":"2020-10-26T21:13:56","slug":"exclusive-emergency-lawsuit-filed-against-google-youtube-to-reverse-massive-election-meddling-purge-complaint-attached","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/?p=2580","title":{"rendered":"EXCLUSIVE: Emergency Lawsuit Filed Against Google & Youtube To Reverse Massive Election-Meddling Purge [Complaint Attached]"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Deb Jordan<\/h4>\n

Emergency Filing Alleges That Youtube Acted At The Behest & Encouragement Of The U.S. House Of Representatives. <\/em>(To Deplatform Content Producers)<\/em><\/h4>\n

Fifteen popular YouTube content creators filed a federal lawsuit today against Google and YouTube, alleging that Google and YouTube have breached the Terms of Service those creators had agreed to when they signed on and violated their First Amendment rights. What started as rumor of a ‘coming widespread purge” of conservative content producers right before midterm elections in 2018, quickly turned into reality as just weeks before votes were to be cast FaceBook disabled 559 pages and 251 accounts.\u00a0 YouTube and Twitter were matching FaceBook’s censorship during that time with the beginning of what we have seen come to pass in the last few weeks.<\/p>\n

According to the press release the Plaintiffs are these popular creators of YouTube channels, with collectively lay claim to over 800 million views: JustInformed Talk, SGT Report, X22 Report, SpaceShot 76, TruReporting, RedPill78, Edge of Wonder, Praying Medic, Amazing Polly, Woke Societies, Daniel Lee, Deception Byes, InTheMatrixxx, Destroying the Illusion, and Sarah Westall.<\/p>\n

The Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys M. Cris Armenta and Credence Sol.\u00a0 Both are former federal law clerks; Ms. Armenta in the Central District of California, and Ms. Sol in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ms. Armenta has been named one of the top 100 female attorneys in California and is on the peer\u2010reviewed SuperLawyers list for civil litigation who fully expect YouTube and Google defend the case and claim that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides them immunity for the actions taken against conservative YouTube commentators and content creators.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit also alleges that YouTube acted at the behest, was encouraged by and coerced by Congress, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff\u00a0 who published a complaint on Congressional letterhead that urged content be removed and replaced. The press release goes further to explain: The Plaintiffs allege that under Supreme Court precedent, if a private party acts when it is encouraged or coerced by the government or its agents, then the state action theory applies and the First Amendment rights should be protected, particularly from viewpoint discrimination. Since Adam Schiff, a sitting representative, personally and publicly in his official capacity asked for social media platforms to begin censoring conservative content providers and YouTube thereafter responded and complied to that request, the door was opened for this lawsuit.<\/p>\n

The Plaintiffs expect that they will either receive or be denied an emergency injunction, or a restraining order upon Youtube, requiring that their accounts be reinstated.\u00a0 If the lawsuit proceeds as expected, it is anticipated that the legal issues raised in the complaint may finally settle the issues relating to Big Tech’s immunity from lawsuits under the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.<\/p>\n

The implications are immense, and the public deserves to be well informed on the progress of this landmark case.<\/p>\n

We will continue to provide updates as litigation proceeds.<\/p>\n

Youtube Complaint<\/a> by Pete Santilli<\/a> on Scribd<\/p>\n