{"id":4809,"date":"2022-09-12T10:54:09","date_gmt":"2022-09-12T10:54:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/?p=4809"},"modified":"2022-09-12T10:54:29","modified_gmt":"2022-09-12T10:54:29","slug":"a-different-take-on-the-dismissal-of-the-trump-v-clinton-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/?p=4809","title":{"rendered":"A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit – The Last Refuge<\/p>\n

\n

To accept a bigger picture is often to accept the foundation of what is present is not what it appears.<\/p>\n

Recently a Florida judge dismissed the lawsuit brought by President Trump against Hillary Clinton. [65-page Ruling Here<\/a>]\u00a0 The media have enjoyed ridiculing Trump by using the words of the judge who dismissed the case.\u00a0 As noted by the Washington Times, \u201cJudge Donald M. Middlebrooks, a Clinton appointee, said Mr. Trump\u2019s filing was too lengthy, detailing events that \u201care implausible because they lack any specific allegations which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pay attention to the framework underpinning Middlebooks\u2019 opinion.\u00a0 I have been reluctant to write about the decision to dismiss the lawsuit of President Trump against a multitude of conspirators, including Hillary Clinton, for two reasons.<\/p>\n

First, because when I originally read the 108-page lawsuit filed in March<\/a>, it took me a few moments, and then I realized this was not a lawsuit; this was a legal transfer mechanism created by lawyers to establish a proprietary information silo.\u00a0 Second, because I do not want another ridiculous subpoena from DC simply because they can\u2019t fathom how any outside entity could solve a puzzle without insider assistance.\u00a0 As to the former, I have prayed on it and come to the opinion it\u2019s worth sharing. As to the latter, it\u2019s just another waste of taxpayer funds, but whatever \u2013 the truth has no agenda.<\/p>\n

So, here\u2019s a totally different take on the issues surrounding the Trump -v- Clinton lawsuit, which -from the outset- I always believed was going to be dismissed because suing all of those characters under the auspices of a civil RICO case was never the objective.\u00a0 However, in the aftermath, the silo created by the lawsuit is also grounded upon attorney-client privilege, a legal countermeasure to a predictable DOJ-NSD lawfare maneuver, which unfolded in the Mar-a-Lago raid and ongoing issues.<\/p>\n

\"\"In March 2022 President Trump filed a civil lawsuit against: Hillary Clinton, Hillary for America Campaign Committee, DNC, DNC Services Corp, Perkins Coie, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Dolan, Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Phillipe Reines as well as Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Business Intelligence, Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Neustar Inc., Rodney Joffe, James Comey Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith and Andrew McCabe. [108-Page Lawsuit Here<\/a>]<\/p>\n

When I was about one-third of the way through reading the lawsuit, I initially stopped and said to myself this is going to take a lot of documentary evidence to back up the claims in the assertions.\u00a0 Dozens of attachments would be needed and hundreds of citations to the dozens of attachments would be mandatory.\u00a0 Except, they were not there.<\/p>\n

After reading further, while completely understanding the background material that was being described in the filing, I realized this wasn\u2019t a lawsuit per se\u2019.\u00a0 The 108-pages I was holding in my hands was more akin to legal transfer mechanism from President Trump to lawyers who needed<\/em> it.\u00a0 The filing was contingent upon a series of documents that would be needed to support the claims within it.<\/p>\n

Whoever wrote the lawsuit had obviously reviewed the evidence to support the filing.\u00a0 However, the attachments and citations were missing. That was weird.\u00a0 That\u2019s when I realized the purpose of the lawsuit.\u00a0 In hindsight, things became clear when the DOJ-NSD raided the home of Donald Trump, and suddenly the motive to confiscate the documents that would be the missing lawsuit attachments and citations surfaced.<\/p>\n

With the manipulative, and I say intentional, \u201congoing investigation\u201d angle of the John Durham probe essentially blocking public release of declassified documents showing the efforts of all the lawsuit participants (Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax<\/em>), President Trump needed a legal way to secure and more importantly share the evidence.<\/p>\n

Think of it like the people around Trump wanting to show lawyers the evidence in the documents.\u00a0 However, because of the construct of the lawfare being deployed against Trump, any lawyer would need a *reason<\/em>* to review the evidence.\u00a0 \u00a0The Trump -v- Clinton et al lawsuit becomes that \u2018reason<\/em>.\u2019<\/p>\n

The \u201cdocuments\u201d (classified or not) are reviewed by lawyers in preparation for the lawsuit.\u00a0 This is their legal justification for reviewing the documents.\u00a0 In essence, the lawsuit is a transfer mechanism permitting the Trump legal team to review the evidence on behalf of their client, former President Donald Trump.<\/p>\n

Once the formation of the lawsuit is established, the retainer and acceptance of the lawyers to represent their client cemented, the legal counsel, discussion and information within legal duties\/obligations of those who represent the plaintiff (Trump) becomes an information silo.\u00a0 In addition to previous executive privilege established by President Trump himself; outside government there is now another silo to defend against the motives of the Lawfare crew (DOJ), the attorney-client privilege<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit itself is the transfer mechanism permitting sharing of the documents and providing legal cover for the reviewers (lawyers).\u00a0 The details within the 108-page filing constitute the claims of the plaintiff in the lawsuit, which were established by the evidentiary documents later seized by the DOJ and FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago.<\/p>\n

\u201cJudge Donald M. Middlebrooks, a Clinton appointee, said Mr. Trump\u2019s filing was too lengthy, detailing events that \u201care implausible because they lack any specific allegations<\/strong> which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached<\/strong><\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

There were no attachments and\/or citations to the documentary evidence in the 108-page filing, because there was a legal risk to citing evidence with a status in dispute by the corrupt people in Main Justice and the FBI.\u00a0 Secondarily, there was an obstruction risk to the President, if his legal team was to publish citations that were part of an ongoing investigation (Durham).\u00a0 \u00a0However, this doesn\u2019t negate the value of constructing the information silo, an attorney-client privilege.<\/p>\n

If the documents seized by the FBI were part of the lawsuit established by President Trump and his legal team via Trump -v- Clinton, then the material seized is all attorney client work product.\u00a0 Lawfully obtained, constitutionally declassified and legally protected material.<\/p>\n

This is where the \u2018special master\u2019 will play a key role.<\/p>\n

Keep watching.<\/p>\n

[Support CTH Here<\/a>]<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

Posted inBig Government<\/a>, Big Stupid Government<\/a>, Clinton(s)<\/a>, Cold Anger<\/a>, Conspiracy ?<\/a>, Deep State<\/a>, Dem Hypocrisy<\/a>, Dept Of Justice<\/a>, Election 2022<\/a>, FBI<\/a>, Joe Biden<\/a>, media bias<\/a>, Notorious Liars<\/a>, President Trump<\/a>,<\/p>\n

Uncategorized<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

via The Last Refuge<\/p>\n

September 12, 2022 at 06:34AM<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit – The Last…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4811,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[103],"class_list":["post-4809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pete-santilli-post","tag-sbn"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=1666%2C950&ssl=1",1666,950,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=300%2C171&ssl=1",300,171,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=640%2C365&ssl=1",640,365,true],"large":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=640%2C365&ssl=1",640,365,true],"rpg_gallery_admin_thumb":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"rpg_gallery_thumb":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=1536%2C876&ssl=1",1536,876,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=1666%2C950&ssl=1",1666,950,true],"newsphere-slider-full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?resize=1280%2C720&ssl=1",1280,720,true],"newsphere-featured":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=1024%2C584&ssl=1",1024,584,true],"newsphere-medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?resize=720%2C380&ssl=1",720,380,true]},"author_info":{"info":["Peter Santilli"]},"category_info":"Pete Santilli - Opinion<\/a>","tag_info":"Pete Santilli - Opinion","comment_count":"0","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/petersantilli.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Screen-Shot-2022-09-12-at-6.32.47-AM.png?fit=1666%2C950&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/plD2r-1fz","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4809"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4809"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4809\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4813,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4809\/revisions\/4813"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/petersantilli.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}