PeterSantilli.com

Blog

  • Minneapolis Woman Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Provide Material Support to Al-Qa’ida

    Minneapolis Woman Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Provide Material Support to Al-Qa’ida

    On August 26, 2020 the Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs released the following information.

    “Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers and U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Erica H. MacDonald today announced the guilty plea of Tnuza Jamal Hassan, 22, to attempting to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization (al-Qa’ida).  Hassan entered her guilty plea this morning before Judge Patrick J. Schiltz in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, in March of 2017, while a freshman student at St. Catherine University (SCU) in St. Paul, Minnesota, Hassan drafted a letter encouraging others to join a designated foreign terrorist organization, namely, al-Qa’ida (AQ), and anonymously delivered the letter to two other students at SCU for the purpose of recruiting those individuals to join AQ.  During a subsequent interview with FBI agents, Hassan denied authoring or delivering the recruitment letter.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, on Sept. 18, 2017, Hassan purchased a round-trip airline ticket from Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MSP) to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and purchased a second round-trip ticket from Dubai to Kabul, Afghanistan.  Hassan later admitted that she planned to travel from Dubai to Kabul where she hoped to join AQ and that she had no intentions of returning to the United States.  On Sept. 19, 2017, Hassan boarded a flight and traveled from MSP to Dubai, but was prevented from traveling to Kabul because she failed to secure a travel visa allowing her to enter the country.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, on Jan. 17, 2018, Hassan, who at that time was living in a SCU dorm lounge without the university’s permission, attempted to set several fires on the SCU campus.  Hassan admitted that she attempted to burn SCU buildings as a retaliatory act against the United States for its opposition to AQ in Afghanistan.

    Hassan has been charged in Ramsey County District Court with one count of first-degree arson.

    This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force, St. Paul Police Department, and arson investigators from the St. Paul Fire Department.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew R. Winter.”

    A local CBS news agency reported on the incident in January 2019.

    The fires were small and quickly contained. Nobody was injured and damage was limited to furnishings, the school said in a statement. A sprinkler system prevented the dormitory fire from spreading beyond a chair to the day care center, where 33 children and eight adults were present.

    “Hassan said she wanted the school to burn to the ground and that her intent was to hurt people,” the complaint said. “Hassan said this was that same thing that happened in ‘Muslim land’ and nobody cares if they get hurt, so why not do this?”

    Hassan, of Minneapolis, was an English major who last enrolled in the fall 2017 semester but is not currently enrolled, the school said. The complaint said she withdrew because she and her family were planning to vacation in Ethiopia.

    The complaint also said she wrote a letter to her roommates containing “radical ideas about supporting Muslims and bringing back the caliphate.” It said the letter scared the roommates, who turned the letter over to campus security.

    “She told the police and fire investigators ‘You guys are lucky that I don’t know how to build a bomb because I would have done that,’” the complaint said.

     

     

  • President Trump Signs Executive Order to Protect Americans Jobs

    President Trump Signs Executive Order to Protect Americans Jobs

    President J. Trump signed an Executive Order to help protect Americans jobs on August 3, 2020. Americans have lost their jobs to foreign H1B visa holders, or by companies outsourcing jobs overseas looking for cheaper labor for years. The President is taking a firm stand and saying no more! With so many Americans having been forced into joblessness due to the COVID19 lockdowns, a ray of hope still shines through the darkness. This change in federal contracting and hiring practices is a welcome, much needed, and positive change.

    “Executive Order on Aligning Federal Contracting and Hiring Practices With the Interests of American Workers” ref. The White House states:

    Section 1.  Policy.  It is the policy of the executive branch to create opportunities for United States workers to compete for jobs, including jobs created through Federal contracts.  These opportunities, particularly in regions where the Federal Government remains the largest employer, are especially critical during the economic dislocation caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.  When employers trade American jobs for temporary foreign labor, for example, it reduces opportunities for United States workers in a manner inconsistent with the role guest-worker programs are meant to play in the Nation’s economy.

    Sec. 2.  Review of Contracting and Hiring Practices.  (a)  The head of each executive department and agency (agency) that enters into contracts shall review, to the extent practicable, performance of contracts (including subcontracts) awarded by the agency in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 to assess:

    (i)   whether contractors (including subcontractors)  used temporary foreign labor for contracts performed in the United States, and, if so, the nature of the work performed by temporary foreign labor on such contracts; whether opportunities for United States workers were affected by such hiring; and any potential effects on the national security caused by such hiring; and

    (ii)  whether contractors (including subcontractors)  performed in foreign countries services previously performed in the United States, and, if so, whether opportunities for United States workers were affected by such offshoring; whether affected United States workers were eligible for assistance under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program authorized by the Trade Act of 1974; and any potential effects on the national security caused by such offshoring.

    (b)  The head of each agency that enters into contracts shall assess any negative impact of contractors’ and subcontractors’ temporary foreign labor hiring practices or offshoring practices on the economy and efficiency of Federal procurement and on the national security, and propose action, if necessary and as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to improve the economy and efficiency of Federal procurement and protect the national security.

    (c)  The head of each agency shall, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, review the employment policies of the agency to assess the agency’s compliance with Executive Order 11935 of September 2, 1976 (Citizenship Requirements for Federal Employment), and section 704 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law 116-93.

    (d)  Within 120 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall submit a report to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget summarizing the results of the reviews required by subsections (a) through (c) of this section; recommending, if necessary, corrective actions that may be taken by the agency and timeframes to implement such actions; and proposing any Presidential actions that may be appropriate.

    Sec. 3.  Measures to Prevent Adverse Effects on United States Workers.  Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of Labor and Homeland Security shall take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to protect United States workers from any adverse effects on wages and working conditions caused by the employment of H-1B visa holders at job sites (including third-party job sites), including measures to ensure that all employers of H-1B visa holders, including secondary employers, adhere to the requirements of section 212(n)
    (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(n)(1)).

     

    Thank you President Trump for looking out for Americans livelihoods, and ability to chase their dreams.

     

  • Court of Appeals Upholds Alabama Voter ID Law

    Court of Appeals Upholds Alabama Voter ID Law

    Tensions are at an all time high between those who wish to destroy, and those who wish to make America better for future generations.  No matter what side of the political spectrum you are on, it is imperative for every American’s vote to count, without fraud or interference. Judicial Watch and (AEF) Allied Educational Foundation have been working behind the scenes to help make that happen. While America has been distracted by riots, protests, police brutality, Coronavirus, Lockdowns, etc… Judicial Watch and (AEF) have been fighting in court to make your vote count.

    On July 31, 2020 Judicial Watch reported a huge win on behalf of all the people of Alabama who want to have their voices heard by casting their vote in a fair and free election.

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit adopted the argument put forth by Judicial Watch and Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in their amici curiae brief when it upheld Alabama’s 2011 Photo Voter Identification Law. The court ruled the law does not violate the 14th or 15th Amendments or the Voting Rights Act and that the anti-voter ID plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the Alabama law causes the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race.

    The appellate panel majority found:

    The burden of providing a photo ID … in order to vote is a minimal burden on Alabama’s voters—especially when Alabama accepts so many different forms of photo ID and makes acquiring one simple and free for voters who lack a valid ID but wish to obtain one.

    The Circuit Court’s ruling affirmed a lower-court ruling in Greater Birmingham Ministries, et al. v. Secretary of State of Alabama  (No. 2:15-cv-02193), in which the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama upheld the Alabama Voter Photo ID Law in a decision handed down January 10, 2018. When the plaintiffs appealed the ruling, Judicial Watch, in conjunction with AEF, filed an amici curiae brief supporting the Act’s constitutionality.

    BallotPedia:

    HIGHLIGHTS
    • As of April 2020, 34 states enforced (or were scheduled to begin enforcing) voter identification requirements. A total of 18 states required voters to present photo identification; the remainder accepted other forms of identification.
    • Commonly accepted forms of ID include driver’s licenses, state-issued identification cards, and military identification cards.

    According to BallotPedia there are still sixteen states that do not require any form of voter identification in order to vote. Those states are Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Wyoming, California, Nevada, and Oregon.

    If you live in Alabama and need to obtain a Photo ID in order to vote, the Alabama Secretary of State provides free photo ID’s for those whom can not afford them. For your convenience they also have mobile locations available. If you know of, or believe you have witnessed voter or election fraud you can report it to the Secretary of State Stop Voter Fraud division.

    Congratulations Alabama and Happy Voting !

     

  • CDC Publishes Study Confirming Face Masks Do Not Stop Virus Transmission

    CDC Publishes Study Confirming Face Masks Do Not Stop Virus Transmission

    Over half of the states within the United States of America have now issued some sort of  “mandatory mask order”. People are being forced to wear masks under the guise “we must do this to protect our neighbors and communities”. These actions are not only unconstitutional, they are unethical, and science does not back up their claim.

    CNBC reported on July 20, 2020 

    “As of Monday, more than half of U.S. states have statewide mask mandates in place to curb the spread of the coronavirus.”

    Main stream media has pushed “to stop the spread of coronavirus everyone must wear a mask”. Main stream media, and politicians have been telling people “wear a mask to help stop the spread of COVID19” for months. It appears as if they have been pushing propaganda not backed up in scientific studies to a trusting public. Is their conspiracy theory true? Do these masks really stop the spread of coronavirus? Let’s take a look.

    A University of California San Francisco article is still using the “Respiratory Virus shedding in exhaled breath efficacy of facemasks” dated March 2, 2020, and published on April 3, 2020 posted by Nature Medicine. Main stream media is continuously using this older study to push the everyone must wear a mask narrative, while completely ignoring a newer May 2020 study posted on the CDC website.

    “But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”

    The newer published ” Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings-Personal Protective and Environmental Measures” dated May 2020 on CDC Emerging Infectious Diseases site states:

    “Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10).”

    “Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (11–13,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (11–13,15,17,34,35)”

    “Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

    “In lower-income settings, it is more likely that reusable cloth masks will be used rather than disposable medical masks because of cost and availability (38). There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for. In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). “

    The FDA confirms the study above under their face mask information:

    Surgical Masks: 

    “While a surgical mask may be effective in blocking splashes and large-particle droplets, a face mask, by design, does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. Surgical masks also do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants because of the loose fit between the surface of the mask and your face.”

    N95 Masks: 

    “People with chronic respiratory, cardiac, or other medical conditions that make breathing difficult should check with their health care provider before using an N95 respirator because the N95 respirator can make it more difficult for the wearer to breathe.”

    “N95 respirators are not designed for children or people with facial hair. Because a proper fit cannot be achieved on children and people with facial hair, the N95 respirator may not provide full protection.“

     

    American Journal of Infection Control and NIH:  “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial” Jun 1, 2009 study states:

    Conclusion: 

    “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds. A larger study is needed to definitively establish noninferiority of no mask use.”

    “Aerosol penetration through surgical masks” August 1992 states:

    Conclusions:

    “The mask that has the highest collection efficiency is not necessarily the
    best mask from the perspective of the filter-quality factor, which considers not only the capture efficiency but also the air resistance. Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the submicrometer-sized aerosols containing pathogens to which these health care workers are potentially exposed. (AJIC AM J INFECT CONTROL 1992;20:177-84)”

    “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systemic review and meta-analysis” February 12, 2020

    Conclusion:

    “The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for general public and nonhigh-risk medical staff those are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients”

    The question is why are certain main stream doctors pushing the everyone needs to wear a mask narrative so hard? Why are certain social media giants deleting facts, while falsely claiming the information coming from scientific studies published by NIH, CDC, FDA, and doctors are “false information”?

    It appears the ultimate goal is control over the whole of the people, under the guise of “medical necessity”.  The only way they can gain control is with the consent of the governed.  When the governed do not speak out against these policies not backed by scientific evidence, the politicians then claim “implied consent” and pass their unconstitutional legislation or executive orders upon the masses.

    Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists the only things Congress is allowed to regulate, no where do they have authority to regulate what you shall, or shall not do medically ! There is no provision in the constitution that states our employees [politicians] are allowed to violate our unalienable rights IF they feel they need to keep you from getting sick. It does NOT exist !

    If you choose to wear a mask that is your individual choice, however for it to be “mandated” to wear a mask is a violation of your unalienable rights and could possibly place you at greater risk of infection. Know the facts, then make your informed decision whether to wear, or not to wear a mask.

    Other Sources Not provided above:

    Ben Swann’s Truth In Media ” Face Masks According to Science ”

    “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systemic review of the scientific evidence” December 21, 2011

    Business Insider 

    CNN: Ohio Governor Orders Statewide Mask Mandate as of Thursday

    The Philadelphia Inquirer “Pennsylvania makes masks mandatory in all public spaces” 

    USA Today: “Face Masks Work. They need to be mandatory.”

    The Hill: ” Poll: Majority of voters support mandatory face masks in public settings”

  • Assassin Kills Son of Federal Judge Esther Salas, Puts Husband in Critical Condition

    Photo Courtesy of Joe Proudman/The Star Ledger 

    Article By: Lorri Anderson

    While police have yet to establish a motive for the shooting, and the FBI are searching for one person in connection with the July 19, 2020 attack on Federal Judge Esther Salas’ home in North Brunswick, New Jersey. It has been reported “the gunman approached her North Brunswick, New Jersey home dressed as a FedEx driver, and opened fire.” TheGreggJarrett.com

    Salas’ 20 year old son, Daniel Anderl was killed after being shot through the heart. Her husband, Mark Anderl, a criminal defense attorney and former Assistant Essex County prosecutor was also shot. Mark has reportedly undergone surgery at Robert Wood Johnson Hospital in New Brunswick. He is currently listed in critical but stable condition.

    Judge Esther Salas was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed in 2011. On July 15, 2020 Judge Salas was assigned to an ongoing lawsuit brought by Deutsche Bank investors. The lawsuit claims the company made false and misleading statements about it’s anti-money laundering policies. The suit also alleged the bank failed to properly monitor “high risk” customers, including convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein.

    At this point it is still unclear if Salas, or her husband was the target of the attack. While Salas has previously received threats, and has presided over several high profile cases such as the 2013 fraud trial of The Real Housewives of New Jersey stars Joe and Teresa Giudice. “The judge also handled the sentencing of Farad Roland, the leader of the South Side Cartel, which the DOJ has called “one of Newark’s most violent street gangs.”  After Roland pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges, Judge Salas sentenced him to 45 years in prison. The sentence term had been part of Roland’s agreement with prosecutors.” as reported by Lawandcrime.com . Salas’ husband Mark Anderl is a notable defense attorney and former Assistant Essex County Prosecutor. Clearly either one of them could have been the target.

    The official Twitter account of Newark, New Jersey’s FBI tweeted: “The FBI is investigating a shooting that occurred at the home of Judge Ester Salas in North Brunswick Township, New Jersey earlier this evening, July 19. We’re looking for one subject & ask that anyone who thinks they may have relevant information call us at 1-973-792-3001.”

    There are several things we can already rule out simply by the reports that have already been released to the public in my opinion.

    #1. This was a coordinated, planned, and thought out assassination. The individual was reportedly dressed in a FedEx uniform. This indicates it was done by someone whom does not want to draw attention to themselves, and also had the resources to obtain that uniform. It has not been established or reported as of yet whether the individual was also driving a FedEx truck.

    If indeed it is found that a FedEx truck was used, certainly that suggests this individual had a much larger amount of resources, and much deeper planning would have gone into this assassination attempt.

    #2. We can draw the conclusion this was no “street thug”, nor a botched “random robbery” due to the fact nothing was reported to be stolen and Judge Salas’ son Daniel Anderl was shot directly through his heart. Just this action alone, makes it apparent this person was a hired assassin or professional hitman wanting to send a clear message to this family.

    The clear message has definitely been sent, now the question remains to whom was it being sent to? If this was a hired assassin or hitman, whom hired the individual?

    Sources:

    TheGreggJerrett.com

    NewsWeek 

    NPR.org

    New Jersey Globe

     

  • Former Democratic Party Chief Sentenced to 21 Months in Federal Prison

    Former Democratic Party Chief Sentenced to 21 Months in Federal Prison

    By: Lorri Anderson

    The United States Department of Justice reports:

    On July 16, 2020 Gerald G. Lundergan, 73, of Lexington, Kentucky, was sentenced to 21 months in prison, to be followed by two years of supervised release, and ordered to pay a fine of $150,000. Co-defendant Dale C. Emmons, 67, of Richmond, Kentucky, was sentenced to three years probation, with nine months served in a halfway house, and ordered to pay a fine of $50,000. The defendants were sentenced before the Honorable Gregory F. Van Tatenhove of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

    Gerald G. Lundergan was found guilty of orchestrating a multi-year scheme to funnel more than $200,000 in secret, unlawful corporate contributions into a campaign for United States Senate and for causing the concealment of those contributions from the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

    On Sept. 12, 2019, following a five-week trial, a jury convicted Lundergan of one count of conspiracy, one count of making corporate campaign contributions, four counts of causing the submission of false statements to the FEC and four counts of causing the falsification of documents with the intent to obstruct and impede a matter within the FEC’s jurisdiction.

    “Kentuckians place a great deal of trust in the political process. Regardless of the perpetrator’s position or status, when that trust is broken by corrupt individuals, law enforcement has a duty to protect the people’s interests. Today’s sentence demonstrates that no one is above the law and we will rigorously pursue anyone who tries to undermine the strength of our democracy.” said Special Agent in Charge Robert Brown, FBI Louisville Field Office.

    “Former President Bill Clinton sent a letter praising Jerry Lundergan. So did University of Kentucky men’s basketball Coach John Calipari.” as reported by MSN.com

    It appears as if the Clinton influence machine has lost it’s luster and influence. Are they no longer “above the law”? Is the Swamp finally being drained? Could this by why main stream media wants you to focus on “Black Lives Matter” instead of what is really going on in America?

     

    Sources:

    United States Department of Justice

    WLKY

    Bill Clinton, John Calipari, other heavy hitters send letters to support convicted KY Politico

  • Virtual Book Burning: Facebook Terminates 100 Pages Silencing The News Release of Steve Bannon Perjury.

    Virtual Book Burning: Facebook Terminates 100 Pages Silencing The News Release of Steve Bannon Perjury.

    Live Reporting and Coverage By: Pete Santilli

    Article By: Lorri Anderson

    Facebook openly admits it has terminated over 100 pages that advocate for Roger Stone. Did Facebook virtual book burn in order to stop President Trump from seeing the release of information revealing Steve Bannon indeed committed perjury either in court, or in Congress? There is now proof Steve Bannon has indeed committed perjury which is a felony.  Whether or not he lied in Roger Stone’s trial to a jury causing the conviction of Roger Stone and tainting Due Process of Law , or in his testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on January 16, 2018 and February 15, 2018 Steve Bannon must be held accountable for his crime.

    18 US CODE 1623:

    (a)Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

    Pete Santilli’s interview of Lee Stranahan, exposes bombshell information about Steve Bannon committing perjury. This interview dated 7/8/2020 was to be mass distributed via social media, including on Facebook in the hope the information would reach President Trump. Later in the day Facebook took down 100 pages connected to Stone — friends of Stone who have been distributing articles and videos intended to reach President Trump. At this point President Trump has no idea Steve Bannon committed perjury. Bannon either lied to one or the other, but ultimately, it contributed to Roger Stone’s conviction at trial. These High Tech companies are complicit and actively engaged in Virtual book burnings suppressing breaking news from the people of America and our President.

    While Twitter and Facebook help promote domestic terrorists such as ANTIFA, and Marxist movements like Black Lives Matter that have literally been burning down businesses, looting, promoting murder, taking over parts of cities, tearing down monuments etc… within our union they want you to believe they are doing this to try and stop “misinformation”, “violence”, and “Inauthentic Behavior”. What they are really doing is violating your right to be informed.

    Stone was convicted last fall of lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering. The charges were brought by a grand jury as part of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

    Stone, 67, is currently scheduled to report to federal prison next week. His lawyers recently asked a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to delay his surrender date to at least early September, citing concerns about the spread of the coronavirus in correctional institutions.
    Stone has asked for clemency from Trump, who has signaled he may be considering a pardon or commutation of sentence. In June, for instance, the president tweeted that Stone “was a victim of a corrupt and illegal Witch Hunt, one which will go down as the greatest political crime in history. He can sleep well at night!”

     FULL EPISODE:  https://evault.video/view?l=1475360652

     

     

    Source Articles:

    Facebook takes down accounts and pages of Trump ally Roger StoneFacebook shuts down pages and accounts tied to GOP operative Roger Stone for posting misinformation

    About Facebook: Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior

    U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

  • Justice John Robert’s Hospitalized Last Month. Should He Also Be Concerned About Possible Epstein Connection?

    Justice John Robert’s Hospitalized Last Month. Should He Also Be Concerned About Possible Epstein Connection?

    By Lorri Anderson & Pete Santilli

    Pete Santilli covers the current breaking news of Chief Justice John Roberts. The Hill, The Washington Post, and other mainstream media outlets have flooded the news cycle with one month old news, while Pete asks some hard hitting questions that need to be answered.

    “I wonder why this guy as a conservative is all of a sudden voting for Barack Obama and the left, ruling for abortion, against the people with Obamacare, and then you match that up with “John Roberts” name on the Lolita Express flight log.” Pete Santilli

    The Boston Herald reported: 

    Jeffery Epstein’s companion Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI on 7/2/2020 at 8:30am in New Hampshire. Maxwell is facing charges in relation to Jeffery Epstein case. The indictment included counts of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury.

    1. Is the “John Roberts” listed on the flight log actually the Chief Justice John Roberts or another “John Roberts” ?
    2. Has the integrity of Chief Justice John Roberts been compromised?
    3. Was Chief Justice John Roberts coerced or forced to rule in favor of Obamacare, and abortion due to blackmail of being exposed?
    4. Why is mainstream media turning a blind eye to a possibly explosive news story? Why are they not asking these questions?
    5. Has the Supreme Court been compromised?
    6. Will Ghislaine Maxwell tell all, to try and save herself from prosecution? If so, and she doesn’t “commit suicide” will she testify that the “John Roberts” listed in the flight log was actually our Chief Justice John Roberts or will she clear his name?

    If indeed it is Justice Roberts on the Lolita Express manifest, he will have a lot of explaining to do.

    Why are we just now learning about the hospitalization of Chief Justice Roberts’ — one month ago — from Washington Post & CNN?

    Gateway Pundit Reports:

    The Supreme Court belatedly disclosed Tuesday night that Chief Justice John Roberts, 65, fell and was hospitalized overnight last month. A seizure was ruled out by doctors with the fall being blamed on dehydration and Roberts’ injury to his forehead from the fall needing sutures, according to a Supreme Court spokeswoman. Roberts fell from a seizure in 2007 and had a seizure in 1993, according to reports.

    Court statement via CNN:

    “The Chief Justice was treated at a local hospital on June 21 for an injury to his forehead sustained in a fall while walking for exercise near his home,” said Kathy Arberg, public information officer for the Supreme Court. The fall happened at the Chevy Chase Club, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    “The injury required sutures, and out of an abundance of caution, he stayed in the hospital overnight and was discharged the next morning. His doctors ruled out a seizure. They believe the fall was likely due to light-headedness caused by dehydration.”

    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was hospitalized last month after falling at a Maryland country club, the court confirmed Tuesday.

    The court told The Washington Post in a statement that the 65-year-old justice fell on June 21 and suffered injuries that required stitches. He was observed at an area hospital overnight and was released the next day.

    Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathleen Arberg told the Post that doctors had ruled out any connections between Roberts’s history of having two seizures in 1993 and 2007 and the June incident. Doctors said the fall was caused by dehydration.

    “The Chief Justice was treated at a hospital on June 21 for an injury to his forehead sustained in a fall while walking for exercise near his home. The injury required sutures, and out of an abundance of caution, he stayed in the hospital overnight and was discharged the next morning. His doctors ruled out a seizure. They believe the fall was likely due to light-headedness caused by dehydration,” Arberg said.

    Arberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill.

    Roberts last suffered a seizure in June 2007 while at his vacation home in Maine, though there was not immediately an easily identifiable cause. He also spent the night in the hospital after that incident.

    The chief justice did not disclose any information about his fall last month and has not revealed any detailed information about his health or the medicine he takes while he’s been on the Supreme Court. Justices typically decide for themselves how much information about their personal health they want to disclose.

    The confirmation of the fall comes as Roberts finds himself in the limelight after he played pivotal roles in several high-profile Supreme Court cases recently in which he sided with the court’s liberal bloc.

    The chief justice was the deciding vote in a ruling striking down a Louisiana law restricting access to abortion and wrote the court’s decision halting President Trump’s plan to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Both decisions were 5-4.

    Roberts, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush in 2005, also sided with the majority ruling that federal anti-discrimination law protects LGBT workers.

     

    SOURCES:

    The Hill : Chief Justice John Roberts was hospitalized last month after a fall, Supreme Court says

    The Gateway Pundit: Chief Justice John Roberts Hospitalized Last Month After Fall

    Newsweek: What is the Lolita Express? Epstein’s Infamous Sex Plane Included VIP’s like Bill Clinton 

    The Giza Death Star: John Roberts: Another Epstein Connection? 

     

  • FACEBOOK INSIDER: “MY FAMILY’S SAFETY IS AT RISK”

    FACEBOOK INSIDER: “MY FAMILY’S SAFETY IS AT RISK”

    Ryan Hartwig was employed by Cognizant the same third-party company reported earlier this week to have contracted with Facebook to conduct content moderation. Cognizant content moderators are called “process executives” and they use Facebook’s review queue to adjudicate whether a post or comment should be allowed, taken down or escalated to a supervisor.

    Hartwig wore a hidden camera to document reviewing of content and office interactions. In an interview with Project Veritas CEO James O’Keefe, Hartwig said although he signed a confidentiality agreement, he could no longer ignore the suppression of Facebook content supporting President Donald Trump, Republican causes or the conservative agenda with a massive exception to the company’s public position on protecting political speech across the platform.

    Follow Ryan on Twitter: @RealRyanHartwig 

    Please Support Ryan: https://www.gofundme.com/f/facebookinsider 

  • DAVID SUSSMAN: “THE LOCKDOWN ENDS ON NOVEMBER THE 4TH”

    DAVID SUSSMAN: “THE LOCKDOWN ENDS ON NOVEMBER THE 4TH”

    Dave Sussman is a nationally recognized Speaker, Show Host, News Correspondent and Writer.

     WHISKEY POLITICS is a produced program with over 200 episodes featuring Dave hosting monologues and long-form interviews with luminaries such as Victor Davis Hanson, Sharyl Attkisson, Ken Starr, Dave Rubin, Molly Hemingway, Dinesh D’Souza, Charlie Kirk, Deneen Borreli, Brent Bozell, Corey Lewandowski, John Stossel, James O’ Keefe, Candace Owens, Scott Presler, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Ann Coulter, Larry Elder, Katie Hopkins, Ben Shapiro, John Bolton, Dennis Prager and many others.  Professionally he is an economist, trainer, small business advocate, has spoken for the SBA, SCORE, and has been interviewed on FOX NEWS, FOX BUSINESS NETWORK, and CNNfn. As a writer he has been published in many nationwide publications including The Washington Post, Huffington Post, Money Matters, and has been interviewed on hundreds of radio shows and syndicated podcasts throughout North America.