Category: Pete Santilli – Opinion

  • Why Hasn’t Christopher Wray’s FBI Arrested Three Masterminds Allegedly Behind The Illegal Nationwide Ballot Harvesting Scheme?

    Why Hasn’t Christopher Wray’s FBI Arrested Three Masterminds Allegedly Behind The Illegal Nationwide Ballot Harvesting Scheme?

    An anonymous source has identified three individuals who are allegedly the top masterminds operating a massive, coast-to-coast illegal ballot harvesting scheme.   Last month, Project Veritas published a scathing expose documenting illegal ballet harvesting in Ilhan Omar’s district, and authorities have been investigating individuals implicated in the bombshell report.

    Although there is clear and convincing evidence, authorities are yet to indict and arrest anyone connected to the scheme.  In fact, an anonymous source revealed that the investigation has already produced three top leaders allegedly running the same exact operation exposed in the Project Veritas report on a national scale.

    Marc Alias, Neal Katyal and Norm Eisen are the individuals who have allegedly masterminded one of the largest voter fraud scams in American history.  Despite overwhelming evidence and eyewitness accounts , FBI Director Wray has recently denied the existence of a “National Voter Fraud Effort“.  Sources also indicate that Alias, Katyal and Eisen have developed an elaborate communications network via online gaming chat threads to avoid detection by NSA surveillance.

    For years, the intelligence community has utilized online gaming chat rooms to communicate off-the-books operational instructions between intel agents as well as with their sources and co-conspirators.  White hat whistleblowers have recently disclosed sample chat logs as a means of directing compartmentalized FBI investigators, but as usual, 7th Floor leadership has quashed numerous investigations.  Several sources have alleged that Alias, Katyal and Eisen are the top generals leading an unprecedented national voter fraud scheme, and their coup network is communicating specific instructions to operational subordinates.

    The intelligence community’s secret communications tactics were first discovered after the Benghazi attacks when Sean Smith was communicating real-time with Eve Online players during the attack.

    Sample Covert Communications Via Online Gaming Channels:

     


    To understand the significance of this sourced information, we have to take a closer look at these three top voter fraud generals.

    NORM EISEN

    A detailed look at Norm Eisen’s shady background reveals he’s one of the most overt CIA operatives in the history of the Central Intelligence Agency.  Eisen doesn’t even conceal his ‘spooky’ traits.  Eisen is reportedly one of the key architects of the “Transition Integrity Project’s” coup manual titled Preventing A Disrupted Presidential Election Transition.

    Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election And Transition by Pete Santilli on Scribd

    REVOLVER.COM: The man who implemented the David Brock blueprint for suing the President into paralysis and his allies into bankruptcy, who helped mainstream and amplify the Russia Hoax, who drafted 10 articles of impeachment for the Democrats a full month before President Trump ever called the Ukraine President in 2018, who personally served as special counsel litigating the Ukraine impeachment, who created a template for Internet censorship of world leaders and a handbook for mass mobilizing racial justice protesters to overturn democratic election results, there is perhaps no man alive with a more decorated resume for plots against President Trump.

    Indeed, the story of Norm Eisen – a key architect of nearly every attempt to delegitimize, impeach, censor, sue and remove the democratically elected 45th President of the United States – is a tale that winds through nearly every facet of the color revolution playbook. There is no purer embodiment of Revolver’s thesis that the very same regime change professionals who run Color Revolutions on behalf of the US Government in order to undermine or overthrow alleged “authoritarian” governments overseas, are running the very same playbook to overturn Trump’s 2016 victory and to pre-empt a repeat in 2020. To put it simply, what you see is not just the same Color Revolution playbook run against Trump, but the same people using it against Trump who have employed it in a professional capacity against targets overseas—same people same playbook.

    In Norm Eisen’s case, the “same people same playbook” refrain takes an arrestingly literal turn when one realizes that Norm Eisen wrote a classic Color Revolution regime change manual, and conveniently titled it “The Playbook.”

    Just what exactly is President Obama’s former White House Ethics Czar (yes, Norm Eisen was Obama’s ethics Czar), his longtime friend since Harvard Law School, who recently partook in war games to simulate overturning a Trump electoral victory, doing writing a detailed playbook on how to use a Color Revolution to overthrow governments? The story of Norm Eisen only gets more fascinating, outrageous, and indispensable to understanding the planned chaos unfolding before our eyes, leading up to what will perhaps be the most chaotic election in our nation’s recent history.

    Eisen is also a Senior Fellow of the Brookings institute, an organization with surprising ties to Chins’a Huawei Corporation. Outside of Brookings, Eisen is providing informal assistance exclusively to the Biden campaign for president.


    MARC ELIAS

    Senior Partner, Perkins Coie , the firm that paid Fusion GPS on behalf of Clinton’s campaign and the DNC to produce the infamous Christopher Steele dossier that reportedly served as part of the roadmap for the FBI to investigate ultimately disproven Russia collusion charges. The same dossier, which contained wild and unsubstantiated charges, was cited as purported evidence in four successful FISA court applications to conduct surveillance on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

    POLITICO: Biden’s campaign is assembling a voter protection staff with a far larger footprint than Clinton’s equivalent in 2016. In addition to a national voter hotline, it has set up 15 state-specific ones. It has a large team of lawyers, including two former solicitors general, Donald Verrilli and Walter Dellinger, and a group headed by Marc Elias, a prominent election law attorney, focusing on voter access and ballot counting in the states. The campaign says it will spend at least $100 million on voter-education efforts alone.

    The New York Times reported in 2015 on a Soros-funded legal campaign, led by Mark Elias — former general counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign — to change voter ID laws in Ohio and Wisconsin. Elias has also led legal challenges to other voting laws, including certain timeframes on early voting.

    FEC records as well as federal court records show that Marc Elias, the Perkins Coie lawyer whom the Washington Post reported was responsible for the payments to Fusion GPS on behalf of Clinton’s campaign and the DNC, also previously served as a counsel for Obama For America. In Shamblin v. Obama for America, a 2013 case in federal court in Florida, federal court records list Elias as simultaneously serving as lead attorney for both OFA and the DNC.

    HEAVY: According to his law firm bio, Elias has also played a role in election integrity issues. On Twitter, Elias describes himself as “a lawyer fighting to elect Democrats up and down the ballot, and protecting voting rights for all.” He has been involved in elections-related lawsuits, such as one intervening in a Nevada state recall.

    “Following the 2014 elections, Marc was appointed by DNC Chair Wasserman Schultz as a member of the Victory Task Force to review key components of the role of the Democratic Party–and related organizations—in recent elections and identify places where the party can strengthen and improve operations in future elections,” the bio recounts. “Marc served as lead counsel for Senator Al Franken in the 2008 Minnesota Senate election recount and contest—the largest recount and contest in American history. He successfully argued the case before the Minnesota State Supreme Court, which resulted in a unanimous decision affirming that Franken had received the highest number of votes legally cast in the 2008 general election for U.S. Senator.”

    Marc represented Senator Maria Cantwell in connection with her 2000 recount, Senator Harry Reid in connection with his 1998 recount, and served as a consultant to the Senate Rules Committee during its consideration of the 1996 Louisiana Senate election contest,” the bio says, adding, “Marc has represented numerous clients in public corruption and campaign finance matters before the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney’s Offices and Offices of Independent Counsel. He has also represented clients before committees of both the House and Senate, as well as before federal agencies.”


    NEAL KATYAL

    Wikipedia: During the Obama Administration, Katyal served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States from May 2010[4] until June 2011. Previously, Katyal served as an attorney in the Solicitor General’s office, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General in the U.S. Justice Department.  While teaching at Georgetown University Law Center for two decades,[3] Katyal was lead counsel for the Guantanamo Bay detainees in the Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006), which held that Guantanamo military commissions set up by the George W. Bush administration to try detainees “violate both the UCMJ and the four Geneva Conventions.”[21]

    Katyal is one of the most vocal advocates of the latest Coup plots to remove President Trump under the 25th Amendment schemes:


    If the allegations connecting Norm Eisen, Marc Elias and Neal Katyal to the massive nationwide voter fraud scheme are true, what is FBI Director Christopher Wray doing to stop them?  At minimum, this matter deserves an in depth investigation, as there are plenty of sources blowing the whistle on their ongoing coup plot, especially after Project Veritas’s latest releases.

     

  • DOJ Investigating Governors Orders Which May Have Resulted In High Death Rate of Elderly Nursing Home Residents

    DOJ Investigating Governors Orders Which May Have Resulted In High Death Rate of Elderly Nursing Home Residents

    August 26, 2020 Press Release by The Department of Justice states:

    Today the Justice Department requested COVID-19 data from the governors of states that issued orders which may have resulted in the deaths of thousands of elderly nursing home residents. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan required nursing homes to admit COVID-19 patients to their vulnerable populations, often without adequate testing.

    For example, on March 25, 2020, New York ordered: “No resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to [a nursing home] solely based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19. [Nursing homes] are prohibited from requiring a hospitalized resident who is determined medically stable to be tested for COVID-19 prior to admission or readmission.”

    “Protecting the rights of some of society’s most vulnerable members, including elderly nursing home residents, is one of our country’s most important obligations,” said Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Division Eric Dreiband. “We must ensure they are adequately cared for with dignity and respect and not unnecessarily put at risk.”

    According to the Centers for Disease Control, New York has the highest number of COVID-19 deaths in the United States, with 32,592 victims, many of them elderly. New York’s death rate by population is the second highest in the country with 1,680 deaths per million people. New Jersey’s death rate by population is 1,733 deaths per million people – the highest in the nation. In contrast, Texas’s death rate by population is 380 deaths per million people; and Texas has just over 11,000 deaths, though its population is 50 percent larger than New York and has many more recorded cases of COVID-19 – 577,537 cases in Texas versus 430,885 cases in New York. Florida’s COVID-19 death rate is 480 deaths per million; with total deaths of 10,325 and a population slightly larger than New York.

    The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division is evaluating whether to initiate investigations under the federal “Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act” (CRIPA), which protects the civil rights of persons in state-run nursing homes, among others. The Civil Rights Division seeks to determine if the state orders requiring admission of COVID-19 patients to nursing homes is responsible for the deaths of nursing home residents.

    On March 3, 2020, the Attorney General announced the Justice Department’s National Nursing Home Initiative. This is a comprehensive effort by the department, led by the Elder Justice Initiative and in strong partnership with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that uses every available tool to pursue nursing homes that provide substandard care to their residents.  As announced on April 10, 2020, the department is also investigating the Soldiers’ Home in Holyoke, Massachusetts, where COVID-19 has taken the lives of at least 76 residents.  https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-investigation-conditions-nursing-home-veterans-massachusetts-announced

    Letters were sent to Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York State, Governor Phil Murphy of New Jersey, Governor Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania, and Governor Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan from the Department of Justice requesting answers. DOJ states “Data will help inform whether the Department of Justice will initiate investigations under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA) regarding New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Michigan’s response to COVID-19 in public nursing homes”

    Mainstream media failed to ask the questions most Americans have been asking for months. Why would these governors place known COVID-19 infected individuals in nursing homes endangering the lives of the elderly? It is widely known the elderly are more likely to catch and die from COVID-19 than any other group. Was this an ‘oversight’?  Was this neglect?  Was this intentional? The American people deserve answers, and so do the many families that have been effected and lost loved ones by these actions. Maybe soon we will get those answers.

     

     

  • Minneapolis Woman Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Provide Material Support to Al-Qa’ida

    Minneapolis Woman Pleads Guilty to Attempting to Provide Material Support to Al-Qa’ida

    On August 26, 2020 the Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs released the following information.

    “Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers and U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Erica H. MacDonald today announced the guilty plea of Tnuza Jamal Hassan, 22, to attempting to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization (al-Qa’ida).  Hassan entered her guilty plea this morning before Judge Patrick J. Schiltz in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, in March of 2017, while a freshman student at St. Catherine University (SCU) in St. Paul, Minnesota, Hassan drafted a letter encouraging others to join a designated foreign terrorist organization, namely, al-Qa’ida (AQ), and anonymously delivered the letter to two other students at SCU for the purpose of recruiting those individuals to join AQ.  During a subsequent interview with FBI agents, Hassan denied authoring or delivering the recruitment letter.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, on Sept. 18, 2017, Hassan purchased a round-trip airline ticket from Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MSP) to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and purchased a second round-trip ticket from Dubai to Kabul, Afghanistan.  Hassan later admitted that she planned to travel from Dubai to Kabul where she hoped to join AQ and that she had no intentions of returning to the United States.  On Sept. 19, 2017, Hassan boarded a flight and traveled from MSP to Dubai, but was prevented from traveling to Kabul because she failed to secure a travel visa allowing her to enter the country.

    According to the defendant’s guilty plea and documents filed in court, on Jan. 17, 2018, Hassan, who at that time was living in a SCU dorm lounge without the university’s permission, attempted to set several fires on the SCU campus.  Hassan admitted that she attempted to burn SCU buildings as a retaliatory act against the United States for its opposition to AQ in Afghanistan.

    Hassan has been charged in Ramsey County District Court with one count of first-degree arson.

    This case is the result of an investigation conducted by the FBI-led Joint Terrorism Task Force, St. Paul Police Department, and arson investigators from the St. Paul Fire Department.

    This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew R. Winter.”

    A local CBS news agency reported on the incident in January 2019.

    The fires were small and quickly contained. Nobody was injured and damage was limited to furnishings, the school said in a statement. A sprinkler system prevented the dormitory fire from spreading beyond a chair to the day care center, where 33 children and eight adults were present.

    “Hassan said she wanted the school to burn to the ground and that her intent was to hurt people,” the complaint said. “Hassan said this was that same thing that happened in ‘Muslim land’ and nobody cares if they get hurt, so why not do this?”

    Hassan, of Minneapolis, was an English major who last enrolled in the fall 2017 semester but is not currently enrolled, the school said. The complaint said she withdrew because she and her family were planning to vacation in Ethiopia.

    The complaint also said she wrote a letter to her roommates containing “radical ideas about supporting Muslims and bringing back the caliphate.” It said the letter scared the roommates, who turned the letter over to campus security.

    “She told the police and fire investigators ‘You guys are lucky that I don’t know how to build a bomb because I would have done that,’” the complaint said.

     

     

  • President Trump Signs Executive Order to Protect Americans Jobs

    President Trump Signs Executive Order to Protect Americans Jobs

    President J. Trump signed an Executive Order to help protect Americans jobs on August 3, 2020. Americans have lost their jobs to foreign H1B visa holders, or by companies outsourcing jobs overseas looking for cheaper labor for years. The President is taking a firm stand and saying no more! With so many Americans having been forced into joblessness due to the COVID19 lockdowns, a ray of hope still shines through the darkness. This change in federal contracting and hiring practices is a welcome, much needed, and positive change.

    “Executive Order on Aligning Federal Contracting and Hiring Practices With the Interests of American Workers” ref. The White House states:

    Section 1.  Policy.  It is the policy of the executive branch to create opportunities for United States workers to compete for jobs, including jobs created through Federal contracts.  These opportunities, particularly in regions where the Federal Government remains the largest employer, are especially critical during the economic dislocation caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.  When employers trade American jobs for temporary foreign labor, for example, it reduces opportunities for United States workers in a manner inconsistent with the role guest-worker programs are meant to play in the Nation’s economy.

    Sec. 2.  Review of Contracting and Hiring Practices.  (a)  The head of each executive department and agency (agency) that enters into contracts shall review, to the extent practicable, performance of contracts (including subcontracts) awarded by the agency in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 to assess:

    (i)   whether contractors (including subcontractors)  used temporary foreign labor for contracts performed in the United States, and, if so, the nature of the work performed by temporary foreign labor on such contracts; whether opportunities for United States workers were affected by such hiring; and any potential effects on the national security caused by such hiring; and

    (ii)  whether contractors (including subcontractors)  performed in foreign countries services previously performed in the United States, and, if so, whether opportunities for United States workers were affected by such offshoring; whether affected United States workers were eligible for assistance under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program authorized by the Trade Act of 1974; and any potential effects on the national security caused by such offshoring.

    (b)  The head of each agency that enters into contracts shall assess any negative impact of contractors’ and subcontractors’ temporary foreign labor hiring practices or offshoring practices on the economy and efficiency of Federal procurement and on the national security, and propose action, if necessary and as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to improve the economy and efficiency of Federal procurement and protect the national security.

    (c)  The head of each agency shall, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, review the employment policies of the agency to assess the agency’s compliance with Executive Order 11935 of September 2, 1976 (Citizenship Requirements for Federal Employment), and section 704 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law 116-93.

    (d)  Within 120 days of the date of this order, the head of each agency shall submit a report to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget summarizing the results of the reviews required by subsections (a) through (c) of this section; recommending, if necessary, corrective actions that may be taken by the agency and timeframes to implement such actions; and proposing any Presidential actions that may be appropriate.

    Sec. 3.  Measures to Prevent Adverse Effects on United States Workers.  Within 45 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of Labor and Homeland Security shall take action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to protect United States workers from any adverse effects on wages and working conditions caused by the employment of H-1B visa holders at job sites (including third-party job sites), including measures to ensure that all employers of H-1B visa holders, including secondary employers, adhere to the requirements of section 212(n)
    (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(n)(1)).

     

    Thank you President Trump for looking out for Americans livelihoods, and ability to chase their dreams.

     

  • Court of Appeals Upholds Alabama Voter ID Law

    Court of Appeals Upholds Alabama Voter ID Law

    Tensions are at an all time high between those who wish to destroy, and those who wish to make America better for future generations.  No matter what side of the political spectrum you are on, it is imperative for every American’s vote to count, without fraud or interference. Judicial Watch and (AEF) Allied Educational Foundation have been working behind the scenes to help make that happen. While America has been distracted by riots, protests, police brutality, Coronavirus, Lockdowns, etc… Judicial Watch and (AEF) have been fighting in court to make your vote count.

    On July 31, 2020 Judicial Watch reported a huge win on behalf of all the people of Alabama who want to have their voices heard by casting their vote in a fair and free election.

    (Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit adopted the argument put forth by Judicial Watch and Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in their amici curiae brief when it upheld Alabama’s 2011 Photo Voter Identification Law. The court ruled the law does not violate the 14th or 15th Amendments or the Voting Rights Act and that the anti-voter ID plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the Alabama law causes the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race.

    The appellate panel majority found:

    The burden of providing a photo ID … in order to vote is a minimal burden on Alabama’s voters—especially when Alabama accepts so many different forms of photo ID and makes acquiring one simple and free for voters who lack a valid ID but wish to obtain one.

    The Circuit Court’s ruling affirmed a lower-court ruling in Greater Birmingham Ministries, et al. v. Secretary of State of Alabama  (No. 2:15-cv-02193), in which the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama upheld the Alabama Voter Photo ID Law in a decision handed down January 10, 2018. When the plaintiffs appealed the ruling, Judicial Watch, in conjunction with AEF, filed an amici curiae brief supporting the Act’s constitutionality.

    BallotPedia:

    HIGHLIGHTS
    • As of April 2020, 34 states enforced (or were scheduled to begin enforcing) voter identification requirements. A total of 18 states required voters to present photo identification; the remainder accepted other forms of identification.
    • Commonly accepted forms of ID include driver’s licenses, state-issued identification cards, and military identification cards.

    According to BallotPedia there are still sixteen states that do not require any form of voter identification in order to vote. Those states are Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Wyoming, California, Nevada, and Oregon.

    If you live in Alabama and need to obtain a Photo ID in order to vote, the Alabama Secretary of State provides free photo ID’s for those whom can not afford them. For your convenience they also have mobile locations available. If you know of, or believe you have witnessed voter or election fraud you can report it to the Secretary of State Stop Voter Fraud division.

    Congratulations Alabama and Happy Voting !

     

  • CDC Publishes Study Confirming Face Masks Do Not Stop Virus Transmission

    CDC Publishes Study Confirming Face Masks Do Not Stop Virus Transmission

    Over half of the states within the United States of America have now issued some sort of  “mandatory mask order”. People are being forced to wear masks under the guise “we must do this to protect our neighbors and communities”. These actions are not only unconstitutional, they are unethical, and science does not back up their claim.

    CNBC reported on July 20, 2020 

    “As of Monday, more than half of U.S. states have statewide mask mandates in place to curb the spread of the coronavirus.”

    Main stream media has pushed “to stop the spread of coronavirus everyone must wear a mask”. Main stream media, and politicians have been telling people “wear a mask to help stop the spread of COVID19” for months. It appears as if they have been pushing propaganda not backed up in scientific studies to a trusting public. Is their conspiracy theory true? Do these masks really stop the spread of coronavirus? Let’s take a look.

    A University of California San Francisco article is still using the “Respiratory Virus shedding in exhaled breath efficacy of facemasks” dated March 2, 2020, and published on April 3, 2020 posted by Nature Medicine. Main stream media is continuously using this older study to push the everyone must wear a mask narrative, while completely ignoring a newer May 2020 study posted on the CDC website.

    “But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”

    The newer published ” Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings-Personal Protective and Environmental Measures” dated May 2020 on CDC Emerging Infectious Diseases site states:

    “Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10).”

    “Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (11–13,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (11–13,15,17,34,35)”

    “Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

    “In lower-income settings, it is more likely that reusable cloth masks will be used rather than disposable medical masks because of cost and availability (38). There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for. In theory, transmission should be reduced the most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem (12,34). Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission (39). “

    The FDA confirms the study above under their face mask information:

    Surgical Masks: 

    “While a surgical mask may be effective in blocking splashes and large-particle droplets, a face mask, by design, does not filter or block very small particles in the air that may be transmitted by coughs, sneezes, or certain medical procedures. Surgical masks also do not provide complete protection from germs and other contaminants because of the loose fit between the surface of the mask and your face.”

    N95 Masks: 

    “People with chronic respiratory, cardiac, or other medical conditions that make breathing difficult should check with their health care provider before using an N95 respirator because the N95 respirator can make it more difficult for the wearer to breathe.”

    “N95 respirators are not designed for children or people with facial hair. Because a proper fit cannot be achieved on children and people with facial hair, the N95 respirator may not provide full protection.“

     

    American Journal of Infection Control and NIH:  “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial” Jun 1, 2009 study states:

    Conclusion: 

    “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds. A larger study is needed to definitively establish noninferiority of no mask use.”

    “Aerosol penetration through surgical masks” August 1992 states:

    Conclusions:

    “The mask that has the highest collection efficiency is not necessarily the
    best mask from the perspective of the filter-quality factor, which considers not only the capture efficiency but also the air resistance. Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the submicrometer-sized aerosols containing pathogens to which these health care workers are potentially exposed. (AJIC AM J INFECT CONTROL 1992;20:177-84)”

    “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systemic review and meta-analysis” February 12, 2020

    Conclusion:

    “The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for general public and nonhigh-risk medical staff those are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients”

    The question is why are certain main stream doctors pushing the everyone needs to wear a mask narrative so hard? Why are certain social media giants deleting facts, while falsely claiming the information coming from scientific studies published by NIH, CDC, FDA, and doctors are “false information”?

    It appears the ultimate goal is control over the whole of the people, under the guise of “medical necessity”.  The only way they can gain control is with the consent of the governed.  When the governed do not speak out against these policies not backed by scientific evidence, the politicians then claim “implied consent” and pass their unconstitutional legislation or executive orders upon the masses.

    Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists the only things Congress is allowed to regulate, no where do they have authority to regulate what you shall, or shall not do medically ! There is no provision in the constitution that states our employees [politicians] are allowed to violate our unalienable rights IF they feel they need to keep you from getting sick. It does NOT exist !

    If you choose to wear a mask that is your individual choice, however for it to be “mandated” to wear a mask is a violation of your unalienable rights and could possibly place you at greater risk of infection. Know the facts, then make your informed decision whether to wear, or not to wear a mask.

    Other Sources Not provided above:

    Ben Swann’s Truth In Media ” Face Masks According to Science ”

    “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systemic review of the scientific evidence” December 21, 2011

    Business Insider 

    CNN: Ohio Governor Orders Statewide Mask Mandate as of Thursday

    The Philadelphia Inquirer “Pennsylvania makes masks mandatory in all public spaces” 

    USA Today: “Face Masks Work. They need to be mandatory.”

    The Hill: ” Poll: Majority of voters support mandatory face masks in public settings”

  • Assassin Kills Son of Federal Judge Esther Salas, Puts Husband in Critical Condition

    Photo Courtesy of Joe Proudman/The Star Ledger 

    Article By: Lorri Anderson

    While police have yet to establish a motive for the shooting, and the FBI are searching for one person in connection with the July 19, 2020 attack on Federal Judge Esther Salas’ home in North Brunswick, New Jersey. It has been reported “the gunman approached her North Brunswick, New Jersey home dressed as a FedEx driver, and opened fire.” TheGreggJarrett.com

    Salas’ 20 year old son, Daniel Anderl was killed after being shot through the heart. Her husband, Mark Anderl, a criminal defense attorney and former Assistant Essex County prosecutor was also shot. Mark has reportedly undergone surgery at Robert Wood Johnson Hospital in New Brunswick. He is currently listed in critical but stable condition.

    Judge Esther Salas was nominated by President Barack Obama and confirmed in 2011. On July 15, 2020 Judge Salas was assigned to an ongoing lawsuit brought by Deutsche Bank investors. The lawsuit claims the company made false and misleading statements about it’s anti-money laundering policies. The suit also alleged the bank failed to properly monitor “high risk” customers, including convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein.

    At this point it is still unclear if Salas, or her husband was the target of the attack. While Salas has previously received threats, and has presided over several high profile cases such as the 2013 fraud trial of The Real Housewives of New Jersey stars Joe and Teresa Giudice. “The judge also handled the sentencing of Farad Roland, the leader of the South Side Cartel, which the DOJ has called “one of Newark’s most violent street gangs.”  After Roland pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges, Judge Salas sentenced him to 45 years in prison. The sentence term had been part of Roland’s agreement with prosecutors.” as reported by Lawandcrime.com . Salas’ husband Mark Anderl is a notable defense attorney and former Assistant Essex County Prosecutor. Clearly either one of them could have been the target.

    The official Twitter account of Newark, New Jersey’s FBI tweeted: “The FBI is investigating a shooting that occurred at the home of Judge Ester Salas in North Brunswick Township, New Jersey earlier this evening, July 19. We’re looking for one subject & ask that anyone who thinks they may have relevant information call us at 1-973-792-3001.”

    There are several things we can already rule out simply by the reports that have already been released to the public in my opinion.

    #1. This was a coordinated, planned, and thought out assassination. The individual was reportedly dressed in a FedEx uniform. This indicates it was done by someone whom does not want to draw attention to themselves, and also had the resources to obtain that uniform. It has not been established or reported as of yet whether the individual was also driving a FedEx truck.

    If indeed it is found that a FedEx truck was used, certainly that suggests this individual had a much larger amount of resources, and much deeper planning would have gone into this assassination attempt.

    #2. We can draw the conclusion this was no “street thug”, nor a botched “random robbery” due to the fact nothing was reported to be stolen and Judge Salas’ son Daniel Anderl was shot directly through his heart. Just this action alone, makes it apparent this person was a hired assassin or professional hitman wanting to send a clear message to this family.

    The clear message has definitely been sent, now the question remains to whom was it being sent to? If this was a hired assassin or hitman, whom hired the individual?

    Sources:

    TheGreggJerrett.com

    NewsWeek 

    NPR.org

    New Jersey Globe

     

  • Virtual Book Burning: Facebook Terminates 100 Pages Silencing The News Release of Steve Bannon Perjury.

    Virtual Book Burning: Facebook Terminates 100 Pages Silencing The News Release of Steve Bannon Perjury.

    Live Reporting and Coverage By: Pete Santilli

    Article By: Lorri Anderson

    Facebook openly admits it has terminated over 100 pages that advocate for Roger Stone. Did Facebook virtual book burn in order to stop President Trump from seeing the release of information revealing Steve Bannon indeed committed perjury either in court, or in Congress? There is now proof Steve Bannon has indeed committed perjury which is a felony.  Whether or not he lied in Roger Stone’s trial to a jury causing the conviction of Roger Stone and tainting Due Process of Law , or in his testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on January 16, 2018 and February 15, 2018 Steve Bannon must be held accountable for his crime.

    18 US CODE 1623:

    (a)Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

    Pete Santilli’s interview of Lee Stranahan, exposes bombshell information about Steve Bannon committing perjury. This interview dated 7/8/2020 was to be mass distributed via social media, including on Facebook in the hope the information would reach President Trump. Later in the day Facebook took down 100 pages connected to Stone — friends of Stone who have been distributing articles and videos intended to reach President Trump. At this point President Trump has no idea Steve Bannon committed perjury. Bannon either lied to one or the other, but ultimately, it contributed to Roger Stone’s conviction at trial. These High Tech companies are complicit and actively engaged in Virtual book burnings suppressing breaking news from the people of America and our President.

    While Twitter and Facebook help promote domestic terrorists such as ANTIFA, and Marxist movements like Black Lives Matter that have literally been burning down businesses, looting, promoting murder, taking over parts of cities, tearing down monuments etc… within our union they want you to believe they are doing this to try and stop “misinformation”, “violence”, and “Inauthentic Behavior”. What they are really doing is violating your right to be informed.

    Stone was convicted last fall of lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering. The charges were brought by a grand jury as part of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

    Stone, 67, is currently scheduled to report to federal prison next week. His lawyers recently asked a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to delay his surrender date to at least early September, citing concerns about the spread of the coronavirus in correctional institutions.
    Stone has asked for clemency from Trump, who has signaled he may be considering a pardon or commutation of sentence. In June, for instance, the president tweeted that Stone “was a victim of a corrupt and illegal Witch Hunt, one which will go down as the greatest political crime in history. He can sleep well at night!”

     FULL EPISODE:  https://evault.video/view?l=1475360652

     

     

    Source Articles:

    Facebook takes down accounts and pages of Trump ally Roger StoneFacebook shuts down pages and accounts tied to GOP operative Roger Stone for posting misinformation

    About Facebook: Removing Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior

    U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

  • Justice John Robert’s Hospitalized Last Month. Should He Also Be Concerned About Possible Epstein Connection?

    Justice John Robert’s Hospitalized Last Month. Should He Also Be Concerned About Possible Epstein Connection?

    By Lorri Anderson & Pete Santilli

    Pete Santilli covers the current breaking news of Chief Justice John Roberts. The Hill, The Washington Post, and other mainstream media outlets have flooded the news cycle with one month old news, while Pete asks some hard hitting questions that need to be answered.

    “I wonder why this guy as a conservative is all of a sudden voting for Barack Obama and the left, ruling for abortion, against the people with Obamacare, and then you match that up with “John Roberts” name on the Lolita Express flight log.” Pete Santilli

    The Boston Herald reported: 

    Jeffery Epstein’s companion Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI on 7/2/2020 at 8:30am in New Hampshire. Maxwell is facing charges in relation to Jeffery Epstein case. The indictment included counts of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and two counts of perjury.

    1. Is the “John Roberts” listed on the flight log actually the Chief Justice John Roberts or another “John Roberts” ?
    2. Has the integrity of Chief Justice John Roberts been compromised?
    3. Was Chief Justice John Roberts coerced or forced to rule in favor of Obamacare, and abortion due to blackmail of being exposed?
    4. Why is mainstream media turning a blind eye to a possibly explosive news story? Why are they not asking these questions?
    5. Has the Supreme Court been compromised?
    6. Will Ghislaine Maxwell tell all, to try and save herself from prosecution? If so, and she doesn’t “commit suicide” will she testify that the “John Roberts” listed in the flight log was actually our Chief Justice John Roberts or will she clear his name?

    If indeed it is Justice Roberts on the Lolita Express manifest, he will have a lot of explaining to do.

    Why are we just now learning about the hospitalization of Chief Justice Roberts’ — one month ago — from Washington Post & CNN?

    Gateway Pundit Reports:

    The Supreme Court belatedly disclosed Tuesday night that Chief Justice John Roberts, 65, fell and was hospitalized overnight last month. A seizure was ruled out by doctors with the fall being blamed on dehydration and Roberts’ injury to his forehead from the fall needing sutures, according to a Supreme Court spokeswoman. Roberts fell from a seizure in 2007 and had a seizure in 1993, according to reports.

    Court statement via CNN:

    “The Chief Justice was treated at a local hospital on June 21 for an injury to his forehead sustained in a fall while walking for exercise near his home,” said Kathy Arberg, public information officer for the Supreme Court. The fall happened at the Chevy Chase Club, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    “The injury required sutures, and out of an abundance of caution, he stayed in the hospital overnight and was discharged the next morning. His doctors ruled out a seizure. They believe the fall was likely due to light-headedness caused by dehydration.”

    Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was hospitalized last month after falling at a Maryland country club, the court confirmed Tuesday.

    The court told The Washington Post in a statement that the 65-year-old justice fell on June 21 and suffered injuries that required stitches. He was observed at an area hospital overnight and was released the next day.

    Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathleen Arberg told the Post that doctors had ruled out any connections between Roberts’s history of having two seizures in 1993 and 2007 and the June incident. Doctors said the fall was caused by dehydration.

    “The Chief Justice was treated at a hospital on June 21 for an injury to his forehead sustained in a fall while walking for exercise near his home. The injury required sutures, and out of an abundance of caution, he stayed in the hospital overnight and was discharged the next morning. His doctors ruled out a seizure. They believe the fall was likely due to light-headedness caused by dehydration,” Arberg said.

    Arberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill.

    Roberts last suffered a seizure in June 2007 while at his vacation home in Maine, though there was not immediately an easily identifiable cause. He also spent the night in the hospital after that incident.

    The chief justice did not disclose any information about his fall last month and has not revealed any detailed information about his health or the medicine he takes while he’s been on the Supreme Court. Justices typically decide for themselves how much information about their personal health they want to disclose.

    The confirmation of the fall comes as Roberts finds himself in the limelight after he played pivotal roles in several high-profile Supreme Court cases recently in which he sided with the court’s liberal bloc.

    The chief justice was the deciding vote in a ruling striking down a Louisiana law restricting access to abortion and wrote the court’s decision halting President Trump’s plan to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Both decisions were 5-4.

    Roberts, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush in 2005, also sided with the majority ruling that federal anti-discrimination law protects LGBT workers.

     

    SOURCES:

    The Hill : Chief Justice John Roberts was hospitalized last month after a fall, Supreme Court says

    The Gateway Pundit: Chief Justice John Roberts Hospitalized Last Month After Fall

    Newsweek: What is the Lolita Express? Epstein’s Infamous Sex Plane Included VIP’s like Bill Clinton 

    The Giza Death Star: John Roberts: Another Epstein Connection? 

     

  • Hillary Clinton & Ukrainian Oligarch Shipped Steel To Iran, Potentially Used For Enrichment Via Nuclear Centrifuges

    Hillary Clinton & Ukrainian Oligarch Shipped Steel To Iran, Potentially Used For Enrichment Via Nuclear Centrifuges

    BYPASS SILICON VALLEY CENSORSHIP!   SIGN UP FOR FREE BREAKING NEWS TEXT ALERTS: Text PETE to 74121 or Visit PeteLive.tv – TEXT

    Documents Provided By Former Congressman Steve Stockman and Verified By Newsweek  – Show Hillary Clinton Allowed Specialized Steel, Which Is Used For Nuclear Enrichment Centrifuges – To Be Shipped To Iran Via Ukraine, and Obama Administration Covered It Up – Retaliated Against Stockman With Trumped Up Charges Where He Remains In Federal Prison On Appeal.

    • Former Congressman Steve Stockman (R) investigated suspicious shipments of “dual-use” steel to Iran in violation of Iranian sanctions. This steel was highly specialized, which is alarming because it could be used for building enrichment centrifuges. This information was corroborated with Ukrainian officials and reported by Newsweek Magazine in 2015.
    • Interpipe, a company owned and operated by Ukrainian Oligarch Viktor Pinchuk (who also owned a subsidiary located in Houston,Texas) was permitted to violate Iranian sanctions while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. At the time Pinchuk was the top contributor to the Clinton Foundation.
    • Stockman was also in contact with a Ukrainian intelligence official who claimed to have had direct involvement in the development of the Steele Dossier on behalf of the DNC and Hillary Clinton prior to the 2016 election. 
    • Without warning, Steve Stockman was indicted in 2017 for what he called “railroading” at his trial, and was (wrongfully) found guilty of 23 charges.  During his trial Stockman was prevented from offering testimony and evidence that would have exonerated him.  
    •  On November 17, 2018, the former Congressman was sentenced to 10 years in prison. 
    • He is currently incarcerated at a federal penitentiary in Texas while awaiting a ruling on his appeal (which could take years).
    • After his sentencing and immediate incarceration, Stockman had expected to continue communication with his Ukanian friend and whistleblower.  Although the judge had discretion to allow Stockman a release pending his appeal, he was shockingly labeled a flight risk, placed in handcuffs, and quickly taken to prison.
    • The status of his Ukraine contact who had become overwhelmed  with fear for his life and safety of his family, is reportedly “on the run” and now assumed missing. 
    • After her appearance on The Pete Santilli Show that aired on September 2, 2019 Steve Stockman’s wife, Patti, began providing important documentary evidence regarding Ukraine corruption the former Congressman had been investigating during the Obama Administration. This documentation was and still is a matter of public record as he also provided the information in written correspondence to the U.S. Treasury and Department of Energy while he was still in office.
    • The Obama Administration refused to respond to Stockman’s serious allegations and inquiries regarding matters of high public importance and national security.  The only formal response from Washington D.C. was in the form of a retaliatory indictment. The full force of the United States Government was weaponized against Stockman who was eventually wrongfully indicted, railroaded during an unfair trial, incarcerated, and left bankrupt.
    • As these matters were being brought to public light, our investigative team attempted to communicate and provide documentary evidence to President Trump’s Attorney, Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
    • Lev Parnas formally announced and began representing himself as “Rudy Giuliani’s Ukraine investigator” on September 21, 2019.  
    • Between September 21st and October 5th, 2019, our team put Lev Parnas in direct contact with Patti Stockman and then contacted  Parnas to ensure follow-through. We questioned him about whether this vital information was passed on to Rudy Giuliani and Parnas confirmed via telephone and text that he had indeed delivered all of the information to Giuliani.
    • On October 10, 2019, Parnas and two others were arrested and charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Unlike Steve Stockman, Lev Parnas is currently free on bond pending trial.
    • On January 3, 2020, a report published by GatewayPundit.com revealed that Parnas was likely a subject of FISA surveillance due to his contacts with foreign entities. 
    • The U.S. Government has so far refused to disclose which legally authorized form of surveillance was employed, but has formally responded by indicating they did not intend to use any information obtained through surveillance. Therefore they not required to provide information to the defendants.
    • Court documents indicate that Parnas is subject to a subpoeana issued by (Adam Schiff’s) U.S. House of Representative’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which requires him to turn over any communication to the HPSCI to corroborate his wtiness testimony.
    • The materials Parnas has supplied to Schiff’s HPSCI contain all of the evidence and correspondence intended for delivery to Rudy Giuliani pertaining to the ongoing Stockman Ukraine investigation.
    • Court documents indicate that Schiff is now in possession of Steve Stockman’s information about Ukraine corruption. 
    • There are four very important questions to be answered:
      1. Will Congress now investigate Stockman’s Ukrainian whistleblower’s allegation; That he was involved in helping to prepare the Steele Dossier for the DNC and Hillary Clinton?
      2. Will Congress now investigate Hillary Clinton’s involvement with Ukrainian Oligarch Viktor Pinchuk’s shipment of highly specialized steel in violation of sanctions against Iran?
      3. Did Lev Parnas misrepresent his roll as “Rudy Giuliani’s investigator”  and did Parnas provide all of Stockman’s important information to Rudy Giuliani?
      4. If Parnas withheld such vitally important information from Rudy Giuliani, why?  Is Parnas a foreign operative?
      5. Will Schiff withhold this important information from the public record & continue to coverup the Obama Administration’s & Hillary Clinton’s election meddling in 2016 & corruption in Ukraine?

    In an article on GatewayPundit.com (Did the Deep State Use FISA Warrants to Spy on Trump’s Personal Lawyer Rudy Giuliani? ) published January 3, 2020, we discovered that government prosecutors left open the possibility that FISA warrants were used to spy on Lev Parnas, Igor Fruman, David Correia and Andrey Kukushkin, the four individuals who were indicted in October and charged with campaign finance violations for taking foreign donations.

    A 21-page indictment was unsealed in October and prosecutors alleged the four men tied to Giuliani were ‘engaged in political activities in the US on behalf of one or more Ukrainian government officials.

    Since September of 2019, our team had been working with former Congressman Steve Stockman’s wife Patti, to not only help bring public awareness to her husband’s federal criminal case, but to also relay vital information to appropriate authorities regarding corruption by the Obama Administration and Hillary Clinton in Ukraine.

    We immediately became alarmed that the confidential communication and investigative efforts between us and Lev Parnas  (who represented himself as ‘Rudy Giuliani’s Ukraine investigator”) may have been surveilled and gathered by Deep State operatives within the intelligence services or law enforcement. Essentially, we were deeply conmcerned with the real possibility of agencies now being criminally investigated for corruption that includes spying on their political opponents and covering up their crimes, had been listening to communications intended for delivery to President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. We believed, based on information from our source, that Lev Parnas was the only primary contact who could get documentary evidence to Mr. Giuliani.

    On September 21, 2019 initial contact with Lev Parnas was achieved.  After we confirmed with him that he was Rudy Giuliani’s Ukraine investigator, he was briefed with the information we had, and was then connected directly with Patti Stockman.

    By the beginning of October 2019, Patti Stockman relayed to us that Steve was becoming very concerned about the sudden shift in attitude and treatment he was receiving from personnel within the Bureau of Prison facility where he was incarcerated.  He became so concerned in fact, that he asked to be interviewed and audio recorded for his own protection. Mr Stockman stated that in the event he was struck with sudden illness or found unresponsive in his cell he wanted the public to know he did not go willingly.  

    On October 3, 2019, and again on October 5th, our team documented Steve’s concerns via audio recordings. On October 9, 2019, just four days after making that audio recording, the sealed indictment against Lev Parnas and his  co-defendants was unsealed. On October 10, 2019 Lev Parnas was arrested and charged. (See indictment here).  

     After reading the breaking news on January 3, 2019, that Lev Parnas may have been surveilled under a FISA warrants, the anomalies and sudden change in treatment by staff and guards that Stockman was extremely concerned over began making more sense.  

    It was at this point we knew there was a very strong possibility Deep State operatives had intercepted our communications meant for Rudy Giuliani via Lev Parnas. 

    Upon reviewing publicly available court records, we not only see there is a high probability Lev Parnas was surveilled under legal authority of a FISA warrrant, but we also learned the court approved forwarding all of that communication and documentation to Adam Schiff, head of the House Permament Select Committee on Intelligence  (See Court Ruling) — sort of a mixed blessing, knowing that Adam Schiff is now in possession of Steve Stockman’s vital documentary evidence regarding Ukraine corruption by Hillary Clinton and her Obama Administration.

    Our primary concern is now about Steve Stockman’s personal safety is heightened exponentially.

    Congressman Steve Stockman sits in a Ft. Worth Texas prison today and the reason may just be more about what he knew and far less about what “they” said he did. 

     

    Former Congressman Steve Stockman had been going after Deep State criminals by investigating their lawless activities for decades.  We first came to know of Stockman back in April – 2014 when after the Bundy Ranch protest, then Congressman Stockman penned a letter to Obama Administration officials, at the time when Sally Jewell was the head of the Department of The Interior and Neil Kornze was Director of The Bureau of Land Management.  Stockman had already been an advocate against government overreach and corruption for many years, and he swiftly intervened during the Bundy Ranch crisis in Bunkerville Nevada in 2014.  

    Stockman’s notice and subsequent letter to Obama Administration officials became a central focus for the defense team in a landmark criminal trial which was dismissed in early 2018 by a Nevada federal judge Gloria Navvaro because of  prosecutorial misconduct and ongoing coverup of exculpatory evidence withheld by BLM agents, federal prosecutors, and the FBI, all who have been fired or demoted as a result. The general public would never know the extent of hatred these officials had for Cliven Bundy and his co-defendants and to what extent they would go to seek revenge until Donald Trump became President. It was then after the veil was lifted, Americans clearly saw for themselves how corrupt the system had really become. 

    One thing is clear, Congressman Stockman had been a thorn in the side of the “DC Deep-State” and they hated him for it. 

     

    In 2014 Stockman took a trip to the Maidan in Kiev Ukraine after being tipped off that deals were being made with Iranian Oligarchs, involving then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. 

     

    At the time there were trade sanction’s  in place against Iran, and Steve Stockman’s investgation showed Hillary Clinton had questionable ties to Ukraine where she used the power of her office as Secretary of State for what could be viewed as a threat to U.S. national security. 

     

    Ukrainian oligarch Viktor Pinchuk, is one of the richest men in Ukraine and he is also on record as being the highest paying contributor to the Clinton Foundation. Doug Schoen, a long-time consultant to Bill and Hillary Clinton and regular cable news commentator also began representing Victor Pinhuk who hired Schoen on a $40,000 per month retainer. In 2004, Schoen introduced Pinchuk to Hillary Clinton … . In 2008, Pinchuk made a five-year, $29 million commitment to the Clinton Global Initiative, making him one of the Clinton foundation’s largest individual donors. 

    As the fourth richest man in Ukraine, Pinchuk owns Interpipe Group, a Cyprus-incorporated manufacturer of seamless pipes used in oil and gas sectors. As far back as November 2014, Republican Congressman, Stockman wrote to the US Department of the Treasury and the Department of Energy questioning Interpipe’s dealings with Hillary Clinton, the Obama Adminstration and Iran.  In That letter Stockman refers to a “body of evidence” detailing “exports from Interpipe to Iranian entities” that “may have contravened US sanctions to Iran” 

    Obvious now, Pinchuk’s contributions to the Clinton Foundation paid off because the oligarch successfully traded with Iran, in violation of U.S. sanctions, and Congressman Steve Stockman went to prison for what he knew.

    Newsweek reported Pinchuk “had courted the Clintons for at least nine years – in the United States, the Alps and Ukraine.”

    Newsweek magazine published an article in April 2015 (Hillary Clinton’s Big Benefactor Has Trade Links with Iran). Important highlights of the article are as follows:

    • “Newsweek has seen declarations and documents from Ukraine that show a series of shipments from Interpipe to Iran in 2011 and 2012, including railway parts and products commonly used in the oil and gas sectors.”
    • “Among a number of high-value invoices for products related to rail or oil and gas, one shipment for $1.8m (1.7m) in May 2012 was for ‘seamless hot-worked steel pipes for pipelines’ and destined for a city near the Caspian Sea.”
    • “Both the rail and oil and gas sectors are sanctioned by the US, which specifically prohibits any single invoice to the Iranian petrochemical industry worth more than $1m.”
    • “The person in charge of this list of non-US companies is the Secretary of State, who between 2009 to 2013 – the period during which Pinchuk’s company was trading with Iran – was Hillary Clinton.”
    • “Pinchuk became particularly friendly with Bill Clinton. In 2010, he invited the former president to his 50th birthday party in the French ski resort of Courchevel. In return, Pinchuk attended Clinton’s 65th in 2011, and was a guest at the inauguration of Clinton’s Presidential Library. The Clintons spoke at Pinchuk’s Yalta European Strategy conference, which seeks integration between Ukraine and Europe.”

    When a Deep State whistleblower comes forward with information that is useful in advancing the radical left’s agenda, they’re heroized & protected.  

    When a real whistleblower such as former Congressman Steve Stockman comes forward to expose criminal corruption, the full force of the Deep State is brought down upon them.  

    In Congressman Steve Stockman’s case, he was fraudulently indicted and railroaded by Obama’s Justice Department in retaliation for his relentless pursuit of justice.  He wasn’t given a fair trial, and Obama’s DOJ prosectutors know it, but they couldn’t have cared less. Congressman Stockman is still being unjustly punished through lengthy incarceration as his case proceeds through the appeal process. 

     

    Urgent Next Steps

     

    • As a matter of national security, former Congressman Steve Stockman should immediately be interviewed as a cooperative fact witness by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham.
    • Stockman should be protected.  He fears for the safety of his family, and his own life, as he is central to exposing Deep State corruption at the highest levels of the Obama Admistration.
    • Stockman should immediately be released from incarceration pending appeal.  The original indictment was retaliatory & fraudulent, he didn’t receive a fair trial, and despite the strength of his appeal which will certainly overturn his 10 year conviction, he remains in a federal prison which is putting his life and safety at risk.  His situation warrants “protective custody”, but within the Bureau of Prisons system, protective custody means solitary confinement — Deep State bureaucrats will swiftly issue the most extreme punishment for speaking out about fear for his safety.
    • William Barr should immediately investigate the origins of the original indictment of Steve Stockman.  Although there is too much information to break down in one article, our team has investigated the case extensively and have determined that Congressman Steve Stockman is a victim of malicious prosecution, bordering on proisecutoirial misconduct.  We will continue to provide updates on Stockman’s case as it moves through the appeal ruling process.

     

    For more information please be sure to visit Steve Stockman’s website:

    DefendaPatriot.com

    The Pete Santilli Show broadcasts Sunday at 6pm EST and Mon-Fri at 9am and 6pm EST.  Tune in to the live stream at petelive.tv and e-militia.com