Category: Lawfare

  • US Supreme Court IS OFFICIALLY CAPTURED

    US Supreme Court IS OFFICIALLY CAPTURED

    January 9, 2023 at 05:08PM US Supreme Court Also Decides NOT to Look at Bonner Case on Legality of Mail-in Ballots

    The US Supreme Court not only decided not to look at the Brunson brothers’ case, but also decided not to take up the Bonner case challenging the legality of mail-in ballots. 

    Such a shame.  The US Supreme Court is absolutely frightened to take up strong cases that challenge corrupt elections or corrupt practices.  Yet this is the biggest issue facing our country right now and the biggest threat to our Constitution.

    Corrupt elections breed corrupt politicians which bread corrupt government officials which breed corrupt media and social media companies and so on…

    In 2020, 18 state AGs joined the Texas case that argued against the corrupt election results that were certified in the swing states that stole the election for Joe Biden.  It was a solid case.  This corruption affected us all and still does to this day.  We all were impacted.  But the three Trump judges decided not to hear the case along with the corrupt Obama, far-left and insane judges on the court.  INSANITY.

    TRENDING: Bolsonaro Condemns Vandalism, 5 Shot and 1200 Arrested as Protesters Disarm Provocateurs and Hand Them Over to Police

    These Three Trump Judges Threw the President Under the Bus and the Texas Case in The Garbage

    The Supreme Court also refused to hear the cases from the Trump campaign against the states where material amounts of corruption existed.

    This morning we heard that the Brunson brothers’ case was not going to move forward in the Supreme Court.

    BREAKING: Brunson Brothers Case Denied by Supreme Court

    The other material election case that the Supreme Court refused to take up was the Bonner case.  This case challenged the legality of mail-in ballots.  The Court didn’t want to take this up either.

    Here is a list of cases that the Supreme Court looked into and their resolution for each.

    Supreme Court Decisions on Cases Bonner and Brunson010923zor_p860 by Jim Hoft on Scribd

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • Clinton-Appointed Judge Claims Trump Signed Court Document That Knowingly Included False Voter Fraud Information

    Clinton-Appointed Judge Claims Trump Signed Court Document That Knowingly Included False Voter Fraud Information

    October 19, 2022 at 11:31PM Clinton-Appointed Judge Claims Trump Signed Court Document That Knowingly Included False Voter Fraud Information

    A Clinton-appointed judge on Wednesday said President Trump signed a court document that knowingly included false voter fraud information, Politico reported.

    “The Court finds that these four documents are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of the obstruction crime,” US District Judge David Carter wrote in an 18-page opinion.

    Judge Carter claimed that emails from Trump’s election lawyer, John Eastman “show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public.”

    “President Trump, moreover, signed a verification swearing under oath that the incorporated, inaccurate numbers ‘are true and correct’ or ‘believed to be true and correct’ to the best of his knowledge and belief,” added Carter. “The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public. The Court finds that these emails are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States.”

    Politico reported:

    Former President Donald Trump signed legal documents describing evidence of election fraud that he knew were false, a federal judge indicated on Wednesday.

    U.S. District Court Judge David Carter wrote in an 18-page opinion that emails from attorney John Eastman, an architect of Trump’s last-ditch effort to subvert the 2020 election, needed to be turned over to the Jan. 6 select committee. Those emails, Carter wrote, “show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public.”

    According to Carter, Trump and his attorneys alleged in a Dec. 4 filing in Georgia state court that Fulton County had improperly counted more than 10,000 votes of dead people, felons and unregistered voters. They then moved that proceeding to federal court and discussed whether to use the same statistics in that filing. In private correspondence, Trump’s lawyers noted that the then-president had resisted signing documents containing “specific numbers.” On Dec. 31, Eastman emailed other Trump lawyers that the numbers filed in state court were not accurate.

    “Although the President signed a verification for [the state court filing] back on Dec. 1, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate,” Eastman wrote in an email to colleagues. “For him to sign a new verification with that knowledge (and incorporation by reference) would not be accurate.”

    However, Trump and his lawyers opted to file the federal complaint using the same numbers that Eastman conceded were inaccurate.

    via The Gateway Pundit

     

  • Durham Denied – Igor Danchenko Not Guilty On All Counts

    Durham Denied – Igor Danchenko Not Guilty On All Counts

    Durham Denied – Igor Danchenko Not Guilty On All Counts

    Igor Danchenko has been found not guilty of providing false statements to federal officials in the course of their “investigation” into the Steele Dossier. After count 1 was dismissed (the Charles Dolan count), these charges remained:

    • Count 2. March 16, 2017: Danchenko told FBI agents he received a call in late July 2016 from a person he thought was Sergei Millian, when Danchenko knew he had never received a call from Millian.
    • Count 3. May 18, 2017: Danchenko gave a false statement to FBI agents that he “was under the impression” that the late July 2016 call was from Millian.
    • Count 4. October 24, 2017: Danchenko falsely stated to FBI agents that he believed he spoke to Millian on the phone on more than one occasion.
    • Count 5. November 16, 2017: Danchenko lied that he “believed he has spoken to [Millian] on the telephone,” when Danchenko well knew he had never spoken to Millian.

    That’s the difficulty of proving a false statements case when the FBI and the Mueller Special Counsel were uninterested in pursuing the truth.

    As we’ve seen from the course of this trial, the most important takeaways from this trial have never been the alleged lies. Danchenko himself has long been known as a fabricator, with his deceptions revealed as soon as information on his involvement in the Steele Dossier, his background, and his FBI interviews was released. Cue observations from 2020 from ourselves and many others:

    What is more important is that which informs our understanding of the Trump/Russia investigation and the FBI/DOJ/Mueller misconduct that sparked Crossfire Hurricane and continued through the Mueller investigation. That information was revelatory. The institutions were on trial alongside Danchenko, with Durham recognizing in closing arguments that “the FBI mishandled the investigation at issue.” And the institutions rightly suffered. Danchenko might have been spared, but is there any reasonable doubt as to the FBI’s incompetence – and guilt?

    This past week, we provided some of the most comprehensive coverage of the Danchenko trial that you’ll find. Our goal is to always provide the most relevant information, preferably through transcript excerpts where you, the reader, can see the testimony for yourself and reach your own conclusions. At the same time, we also aim for concision. We hope that we achieved those goals.

    For us, here are some of the most important highlights from the trial:

    • Danchenko was a confidential human source for the FBI from March 2017 through October 2020. He was accused of giving a number of false statements during that time period. He was paid over $200,000 as an informant, and his status as a CHS buried him as a witness. “Sources and methods.”
    • The Mueller Special Counsel had FBI Agents and Analysts investigating the Steele Dossier – but purposefully limited the scope of that inquiry, making sure any information damning to their investigation would not be uncovered. Former FBI Intelligence Analyst Brittany Hertzog testified she learned of Charles Dolan’s connections to Danchenko during her time with the Mueller Special Counsel. She requested to interview Dolan; others opposed that request. The opposition won out.

    • Director Comey was informed on all parts of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, from its beginnings up until (theoretically) his termination.
    • FBI Special Agent Kevin Helson, who handed Danchenko as a confidential human source, omitted key derogatory information – that Danchenko was the target of a previous espionage case – in his opening paperwork.
    • FBI Special Agent Kevin Helson was recommended to assess Danchenko’s employer and look at the financial nature of Danchenko’s employment. Helson failed to do so.
    • FBI Special Agent Kevin Helson was recommended to investigate whether Danchenko lied in his visa and immigration documents. Helson failed to do so.
    • FBI Special Agent Kevin Helson (there’s a purpose in the repetition) was recommended to conduct a polygraph of Danchenko to determine if he “has ever been tasked by a foreign individual, entity or government to collect information or to perform actions adverse to the U.S. interest.” Helson failed to polygraph Danchenko.
    • Crossfire Hurricane started based on “a suggestion of some kind of suggestion” from a “friendly foreign government.” It was opened as a “full investigation,” which allowed for the use of “investigative tools” not allowed at the “preliminary investigation stage.
    • The FBI wanted a FISA on Carter Page “fairly early on” – around the end of July 2016 or soon thereafter. However, the FBI didn’t have enough to “secure” the warrant. The evidence wasn’t there.
    • FBI Analyst Brian Auten was unable to “confirm or corroborate” any of the Steele Dossier claims from the receipt of the document until the first FISA application in October 2016.
    • FBI Analyst Brian Auten and FBI colleague Stephen Somma knew Democrat Charles Dolan could be a source of information of the Steele Dossier. Neither asked Danchenko about Dolan.
    • Dolan would ultimately testify that he believed some Dossier information came from him.
    • The FBI checked with other agencies and was unable to corroborate the Dossier info.
    • FBI Analyst Brian Auten is a “subject” of the Durham investigation and will likely be “suspended” by the FBI.
    • Sergei Millian was a confidential human source (CHS) for the FBI’s Atlanta Field Office. The Crossfire Hurricane team found no evidence Millian had “assisted in the interference” of the 2016 presidential election.
    • While Danchenko told the FBI he spoke with Millian. E-mails from Millian demonstrate he had no idea who Millian was. The FBI/Mueller Special Counsel never obtained those e-mails.

    The unanswered questions

    When presented with the FBI failures documented during the Danchenko trial (and the Michael Sussmann trial), one can’t help but be reminded of their investigation of the DNC “hack.” Both investigations have similar types of “errors”: the failure to pursue investigative leads and collect evidence, and uncorroborated claims of Russian interference (or collusion) based on information provided by DNC/Clinton “contractors”.

    Read more here…

    via Zerohedge

    October 18, 2022 at 04:41PM

  • BREAKING: DOJ Recommending Steve Bannon Be Sentenced to Six Months in Prison

    BREAKING: DOJ Recommending Steve Bannon Be Sentenced to Six Months in Prison

    BREAKING: DOJ Recommending Steve Bannon Be Sentenced to Six Months in Prison

    The Department of Justice is recommending that former Trump advisor and War Room host Steve Bannon be sentenced to six months in prison and a $200,000 fine for defying the January 6 Committee.

    Bannon was convicted of contempt of Congress in July for refusing to comply with a subpoena from the committee.

    In the recommendation, the DOJ claimed that Bannon “has pursued a bad-faith strategy of defiance and contempt.”

    The DOJ also stated that Bannon “flouted the Committee’s authority and ignored the subpoena’s demands.”

    The recommendation continued, “to this day the Defendant has not produced a single document to the Committee or appeared for testimony. For his sustained, bad-faith contempt of Congress, the Defendant should be sentenced to six months’ imprisonment—the top end of the Sentencing Guidelines’ range—and fined $200,000—based on his insistence on paying the maximum fine rather than cooperate with the Probation Office’s routine pre-sentencing financial investigation.”

    Part of the committee’s reason for subpoenaing Bannon was that he had predicted on his podcast that “All Hell is going to break loose tomorrow” — something almost everyone was saying at the time.

    Anti-Trump neocon Liz Cheney and Democrat Rep. Bennie G. Thompson, chairs of the committee, had celebrated Bannon’s conviction in a joint statement after he was found guilty.

    “The conviction of Steve Bannon is a victory for the rule of law and an important affirmation of the Select Committee’s work,” Thompson and Cheney said in a joint statement at the time. “Just as there must be accountability for all those responsible for the events of January 6th, anyone who obstructs our investigation into these matters should face consequences.”

    Bannon is scheduled to be sentenced on October 21, 2022—one year to the day after he was held in contempt by the House.

    You can read the full recommendation by the DOJ here.

    via The Gateway Pundit

    October 17, 2022 at 05:32PM

  • EPIC:  Alex Jones Responds to Billion Dollar Judgement

    EPIC: Alex Jones Responds to Billion Dollar Judgement

    EXCLUSIVE: Alex Jones Responds to Billion Dollar Judgement

    Alex Jones responded to the nearly $1 Billion dollar judgement in the Sandy Hook case on Wednesday.

    “They want to scare everybody away from freedom, and scare us away from questioning Uvalde and what really happened there, or Parkland or any other event. And guess what? We’re not scared, and we’re not going away, and we’re not going to stop,” Jones said on The Alex Jones Show.

    “For hundreds of thousands of dollars, I can keep them in court for years, I can appeal this stuff, we can stand up against this travesty, against the billions of dollars they want. It’s a joke.”

    Jones attorney Norm Pattis also called the kangaroo court following the billion dollar verdict:


    via Infowars

    October 12, 2022 at 05:06PM

  • NY AG Letitia James Lawsuit Seeks to Make Trump Pay $250 Million, Ban Trumps From Running NY Businesses, Buying Real Estate – Makes Criminal Referral to DOJ

    NY AG Letitia James Lawsuit Seeks to Make Trump Pay $250 Million, Ban Trumps From Running NY Businesses, Buying Real Estate – Makes Criminal Referral to DOJ

    NY AG Letitia James Lawsuit Seeks to Make Trump Pay $250 Million, Ban Trumps From Running NY Businesses, Buying Real Estate – Makes Criminal Referral to DOJ

     

    “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.”

    New York Attorney General Letitia James on Wednesday announced a new lawsuit against former President Donald Trump and his family.

    AG James has been investigating whether the Trump Organization inflated values of some of its properties.

    “Today, I filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump for engaging in years of financial fraud to enrich himself, his family, and the Trump Organization.” Letitia James said.

    TRENDING: EXCLUSIVE: Unhinged East Bay Doctor Calls and Leaves Harassing Message with Stewart Rhodes’ Attorneys – Says He Wants Rhodes Exterminated – Then Confirms the Call to Gateway Pundit (AUDIO)

    “There aren’t two sets of laws for people in this nation: former presidents must be held to the same standards as everyday Americans.” she added.

    Letitia James said her office is seeking to:

    • Make Trump pay $250 million.
    • Ban the Trumps from running NY businesses for good.
    • Ban Trump and Trump Org from buying commercial real estate in NY for 5 yrs.
    • We’re making a criminal referral to the US Department of Justice

    “With the help of Donald Jr., Eric, Ivanka, and other defendants, Trump variously unlawfully inflated and deflated his net worth by billions to obtain and satisfy loans, get insurance benefits, and pay lower taxes. In short, he lied to gain massive financial benefits for himself,” Letitia James said on Wednesday.

    “We found that Trump, his family, and the Trump Org used fraudulent and misleading asset valuations over 200 times in 10 years on his annual financial statements. These statements were then used to obtain hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and insurance coverage,’ she added.

    VIDEO:

     

      

    Letitia James has been harassing Trump and his family…just as she promised.

    In November 2018 after her election, Letitia James immediately began cursing and threatening President Donald Trump.

    WATCH:

     

     

    via The Gateway Pundit

    September 21, 2022 at 05:08PM

  • “I Don’t Want to Hear ‘Hillary Clinton’ Again!” Judge and Alex Jones Lawyer Get Into Heated Exchange

    “I Don’t Want to Hear ‘Hillary Clinton’ Again!” Judge and Alex Jones Lawyer Get Into Heated Exchange

    September 15, 2022 at 06:29AM “I Don’t Want to Hear ‘Hillary Clinton’ Again!” Judge and Alex Jones Lawyer Get Into Heated Exchange – Breaking911

    Judge Barbara Bellis and Alex Jones’ lawyer got into a heated exchange after Norm Pattis brought up Hillary Clinton’s mention of Jones and Sandy Hook during her 2016 presidential campaign. “I already ruled on the Clinton issue and we’re moved on from that,” Judge Bellis said to Pattis. “Stick with the Megyn Kelly and I don’t want to hear Hillary Clinton again.”

    via Breaking911

  • Texas Woman Charged with Threatening to Kill Judge Who Allowed Special Master in Trump Raid Case

    Texas Woman Charged with Threatening to Kill Judge Who Allowed Special Master in Trump Raid Case

    September 12, 2022 at 04:34PM Texas Woman Charged with Threatening to Kill Judge Who Allowed Special Master in Trump Raid Case

    A Texas woman was arrested and charged with threatening to kill the federal judge presiding over Trump’s special master case.

    Judge Aileen Cannon granted President Trump’s request for a Special Master review of the material confiscated by the Biden DOJ during their raid on his home at Mar-a-Lago.

    Judge Cannon also ‘temporarily enjoins’ or forbid the Biden regime from ‘reviewing and using the seized materials’ pending the completion of the review.

    It appears Tiffani Shea Gish of Houston fell for the fake news being pumped out by the Washington Post, NY Times, CNN and other far-left outlets.

    On September 1, Gish left three threatening voicemails for Judge Aileen Cannon using the pseudonym “Evelyn Salt” – named after the fictional Russian agent played by Angelina Jolie in the action thriller “Salt.”

    Gish fell for the fake news stories claiming Trump stored highly classified records related to nuclear weapons at his Mar-a-Lago residence.

    Trump is “marked for assassination and so are you,” Gish said in one of her threatening messages, according to CNBC.

    According to CNBC, Magistrate Judge Peter Bray last week ordered Gish detained pending trial saying she “appears to suffer from severe mental impairments with symptoms including paranoia and delusions.”

    CNBC News reported:

    A Texas woman has been charged with threatening to kill the federal judge presiding over a dispute between former President Donald Trump and the Department of Justice about records seized in an FBI raid of Trump’s home last month.

    An FBI special agent said Tiffani Shea Gish of Houston left three threatening voicemails for the chamber telephone of Judge Aileen Cannon of U.S. District Court in southern Florida, according to a criminal complaint filed Sept. 6.

    Identifying herself as the fictional Russian agent Evelyn Salt, Gish claimed to be “in charge of nuclear” for the government, a federal agent and “Trump’s hitman” who had a “license to kill,” according to transcribed excerpts of the calls included in the complaint.

    Gish’s pseudonym is the same name as the protagonist played by Angelina Jolie in the 2010 action film Salt.

    Trump is “marked for assassination and so are you,” Gish said in the expletive-filled messages, the complaint showed. “You’re full of s—, and I’m going to f—— have you shot myself. I’ve already ordered snipers and a bomb to your f—— house,” Gish allegedly said in the voicemails, all of which were made on Sept. 1.

    When agents came to her residence on Sept. 4, Gish would initially only speak through a balcony window, but eventually invited the agents in and spoke with them for about 45 minutes, the complaint said. Gish in that interview said she left the voicemails from her cellphone, and also confirmed that a Facebook account with posts echoing the language of the voicemails belonged to her, according to the complaint.

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • BREAKING: Judge Aileen Cannon Grants President Trump’s Request for Special Master Review of Documents Seized During Mar-a-Lago Raid – BLOCKS BIDEN REGIME FROM ACCESS Pending Review

    BREAKING: Judge Aileen Cannon Grants President Trump’s Request for Special Master Review of Documents Seized During Mar-a-Lago Raid – BLOCKS BIDEN REGIME FROM ACCESS Pending Review

    BREAKING: Judge Aileen Cannon Grants President Trump’s Request for Special Master Review of Documents Seized During Mar-a-Lago Raid – BLOCKS BIDEN REGIME FROM ACCESS Pending Review

    https://ift.tt/giJdAxf

    District Judge Aileen Mercedes Cannon

    Trump-appointed US District Judge Aileen Cannon from the southern district of Florida on Saturday announced the “preliminary intent to appoint a special master” to review all of the records seized by the FBI during its unprecedented raid on President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago.

    Judge Cannon said the FBI raid on Mar-a-lago “involved political calculations” to diminish the leading voice of the Republican Party just months before the midterm election.

    Every attack on President Trump has been a political calculation to stomp out the voice of the American people.

    TRENDING: BREAKING: Judge Aileen Cannon Grants President Trump’s Request for Special Master Review of Documents Seized During Mar-a-Lago Raid – BLOCKS BIDEN REGIME FROM ACCESS Pending Review

    On Labor Day Monday Judge Aileen Cannon granted President Trump’s request for a Special Master review of the material confiscated by the Biden DOJ during their raid on his home at Mar-a-Lago.

    More… Judge Cannon also ‘temporarily enjoins’ or forbid the Biden regime from ‘reviewing and using the seized materials’ pending the completion of the review.

    The Daily Mail reported:

    The judge also ‘temporarily enjoins’ the government from ‘reviewing and using the seized materials’ pending the completion of the review.

    That grants Trump and his legal team a side benefit of stalling the fast-moving proceedings that have unfolded since the August 8 FBI search of Mar-a-Lago.


    via The Gateway Pundit

    September 5, 2022 at 04:18PM

  • Trump says he refused to answer questions in deposition for New York AG Letitia James’ probe of business

    August 10, 2022 at 04:56PM Trump says he refused to answer questions in deposition for New York AG Letitia James’ probe of business

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump leaves Trump Tower to meet with New York Attorney General Letitia James for a civil investigation on August 10, 2022 in New York City.

    James Devaney | Gc Images | Getty Images

    Former President Donald Trump said he refused to answer questions Wednesday at a deposition by investigators for New York Attorney General Letitia James as part of her civil probe into the Trump Organization.

    Trump announced in an emailed statement he had invoked his Fifth Amendment right against making self-incriminating statements shortly after arriving for the court-ordered interview under oath at James’ offices in New York City.

    “I once asked, ‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?’ Now I know the answer to that question,” Trump said in that furious statement, which claimed James is a renegade prosecutor with a vendetta against him and his company.

    “When your family, your company, and all the people in your orbit have become the targets of an unfounded, politically motivated Witch Hunt supported by lawyers, prosecutors, and the Fake News Media, you have no choice,” Trump said.

    “Accordingly, under the advice of my counsel and for all of the above reasons, I declined to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States Constitution,” he said.

    In 2016 Trump suggested that people who cite the Fifth Amendment when being questioned are guilty of something.

    A spokeswoman for James did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Trump’s move.

    The attorney general is focused on allegations that the Trump Organization improperly reported the stated valuations of some of its real estate assets for financial gain, in the form of better terms on loans and insurance, and tax benefits.

    Trump’s deposition came two days after the FBI, in an unrelated criminal investigation, raided his home at the Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, and seized what his attorney has said were about a dozen boxes of documents.

    That search was related to an ongoing investigation into whether laws were broken when boxes of White House records — which included some documents marked as classified — ended up at Mar-a-Lago instead of the National Archives.

    A Manhattan Supreme Court judge in his February ruling ordering Trump and two of his adult children to submit to questioning by James’ team noted they would “have the right to refuse to answer any questions that they claim might incriminate them.”

    Judge Arthur Engoron also wrote that if the Trumps invoked the Fifth Amendment, their refusal to answer questions cannot be used against them in a criminal prosecution.

    But Engoron went on to note that a jury in a civil case is allowed to draw “a negative inference” when a party to the case “invokes that right against self-incrimination.” In other words, James could argue to a jury that it should assume Trump has conceded her claims against him by refusing to answer her questions.

    The Trumps had asked Engoron to block the subpoenas, or at least stay their enforcement until the conclusion of a parallel criminal probe of the Trump Organization by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

    Former US President Donald Trump waves while walking to a vehicle in New York City on August 10, 2022. Donald Trump on Wednesday declined to answer questions under oath in New York over alleged fraud at his family business, as legal pressures pile up for the former president whose house was raided by the FBI just two days ago.

    Stringer | Afp | Getty Images

    Trump has denied wrongdoing in all the pending probes involving him.

    Trump said he decided he had “absolutely no choice” but to plead the Fifth in James’ deposition following the FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago “because the current Administration and many prosecutors in this Country have lost all moral and ethical bounds of decency.”

    In a post on his social media platform early Wednesday, he also accused James, who is Black, of being “racist,” a charge he has also previously leveled at her and two other Black prosecutors who are separately investigating him.

    Trump and two of his adult children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, for months had resisted complying with subpoenas from James demanding their testimony under oath for her probe.

    But after failing in court efforts to block those subpoenas, Donald Jr. and Ivanka answered questions from James’ investigators last week, NBC previously reported. Donald Jr. runs the Trump Organization with his brother Eric Trump, and Ivanka is a former Trump Organization executive who served as a senior White House advisor during her father’s administration.

    Eric Trump invoked his Fifth Amendment right more than 500 times when he was questioned under oath in the probe in October 2020, according to a court filing in January.

    While campaigning for president in 2016, Trump in a speech in Iowa blasted some staffers of his Democratic opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, for invoking the Fifth Amendment when they were questioned by a House select committee investigating the attack on American diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

    “So there are five people taking the Fifth Amendment. Like you see on the mob, right? You see the mob takes the Fifth. If you’re innocent why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” Trump asked at that time.

    Trump’s refusal to testify Wednesday made even more dramatic a week that began with what is believed to be the first-ever search of a former president’s residence by federal law enforcement agents as part of a criminal probe.

    Monday’s raid sparked a political firestorm, with Republicans harshly criticizing the FBI — which is led by Director Chris Wray, a Trump appointee — and demanding answers about the reasons for it from Attorney General Merrick Garland, a nominee of President Joe Biden.

    The Department of Justice has not revealed details about the search warrant that the FBI executed.

    Legal experts say Trump’s lawyers are in possession of a copy of that search warrant and that they can disclose its contents if they choose. The warrant and a related affidavit in support of it would detail what the FBI was looking for and how the agency believed there was probable cause that a crime or crimes had been committed that related to that evidence.

    But Trump’s team does not plan to release a copy of the warrant, a source close to Trump told NBC News.

    Trump and his family and business are the focus of multiple active investigations at the state and federal level.

    In addition to the probe of records at Mar-a-Lago, the Justice Department is reportedly investigating events leading to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot by thousands of Trump supporters, who for hours disrupted the confirmation of Biden’s electoral victory by a joint session of Congress.

    The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office last year charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer with a criminal scheme to evade taxes in compensation paid to executives.

    In Georgia, a special state grand jury is investigating possible criminal efforts by Trump and others to interfere in the 2020 presidential election in that state as part of a nationwide push to overturn Biden’s victory in the race for the White House.

    On Tuesday, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., upheld a lower court ruling dismissing an effort by Trump to block the House Ways and Means Committee from obtaining several years of his federal income tax returns and those of a number of Trump business entities from the Treasury Department.

    The committee has said it wants those records to review how the IRS is complying with a law that requires annual audits of the tax returns of sitting presidents.

    via CNBC