Category: Featured Stories

  • Opinion | Mike Pence: My Last Days With Donald Trump

    Opinion | Mike Pence: My Last Days With Donald Trump

    November 10, 2022 at 11:32AM Opinion | Mike Pence: My Last Days With Donald Trump

    Thirteen days after the 2020 election, I had lunch with President Trump. I told him that if his legal challenges came up short, he could simply accept the results, move forward with the transition, and start a political comeback, winning the Senate runoffs in Georgia, the 2021 Virginia governor’s race, and the House and Senate in 2022. Then he could run for president in 2024 and win. He seemed unmoved, even weary: “I don’t know, 2024 is so far off.”

    In a Dec. 5 call, the president for the first time mentioned challenging the election results in Congress. By mid-December, the internet was filled with speculation about my role. An irresponsible TV ad by a group calling itself the Lincoln Project suggested that when I presided over the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress to count the electoral votes, it would prove that I knew “it’s over,” and that by doing my constitutional duty, I would be “putting the final nail in the coffin” of the president’s re-election. To my knowledge, it was the first time anyone implied I might be able to change the outcome. It was designed to annoy the president. It worked. During a December cabinet meeting, President Trump told me the ad “looked bad for you.” I replied that it wasn’t true: I had fully supported the legal challenges to the election and would continue to do so.

    On Dec. 19, the president mentioned plans for a rally in Washington on Jan. 6. I thought that would be useful to call attention to the proceedings. I had just spoken with a senator about the importance of vetting concerns about the election before Congress and the American people. At the White House on Dec. 21, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan led lawmakers in a discussion about plans to bring objections. I promised that all properly submitted objections would be recognized and fully debated.

    On Dec. 23, my family boarded Air Force Two to spend Christmas with friends. As we flew across America, President Trump retweeted an obscure article titled “Operation Pence Card.” It alluded to the theory that if all else failed, I could alter the outcome of the election on Jan. 6. I showed it to Karen, my wife, and rolled my eyes.

    On Dec. 30, Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley announced that he would co-sponsor election objections brought by representatives. I welcomed Sen. Hawley’s decision because it meant we would have a substantive debate. Without a senator’s support, I would have been required to dismiss House objections without debate, something I didn’t want to do.

    Early on New Year’s Day, the phone rang. Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert and other Republicans had filed a lawsuit asking a federal judge to declare that I had “exclusive authority and sole discretion” to decide which electoral votes should count. “I don’t want to see ‘Pence Opposes Gohmert Suit’ as a headline this morning,” the president said. I told him I did oppose it. “If it gives you the power,” he asked, “why would you oppose it?” I told him, as I had many times, that I didn’t believe I possessed that power under the Constitution.

    “You’re too honest,” he chided. “Hundreds of thousands are gonna hate your guts. . . . People are gonna think you’re stupid.”

    On Saturday, Jan. 2, I instructed my chief of staff to issue a statement supporting the right of lawmakers to bring objections under the Electoral Count Act. By Sunday morning, the headline “Pence Welcomes Congressional Republicans’ Bid to Challenge Electoral Votes” was everywhere. When the president called me that morning, his mood had brightened. “You have gone from very unpopular to popular!” he exclaimed. But then he pressed me again to reject electoral votes unilaterally. “You can be a historic figure,” he said, “but if you wimp out, you’re just another somebody.”

    On Jan. 4, the president’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, summoned me to the Oval Office for a meeting with a long list of attendees, including the legal scholar John Eastman. I listened respectfully as Mr. Eastman argued that I should modify the proceedings, which require that electoral votes be opened and counted in alphabetical order, by saving the five disputed states until the end. Mr. Eastman claimed I had the authority to return the votes to the states until each legislature certified which of the competing slate of electors for the state was correct. I had already confirmed that there were no competing electors.

    Mr. Eastman repeatedly qualified his argument, saying it was only a legal theory. I asked, “Do you think I have the authority to reject or return votes?”

    He stammered, “Well, it’s never been tested in the courts, so I think it is an open question.”

    At that I turned to the president, who was distracted, and said, “Mr. President, did you hear that? Even your lawyer doesn’t think I have the authority to return electoral votes.” The president nodded. As Mr. Eastman struggled to explain, the president replied, “I like the other thing better,” presumably meaning that I could simply reject electoral votes.

    On Jan. 5, I got an urgent call that the president was asking to see me in the Oval Office. The president’s lawyers, including Mr. Eastman, were now requesting that I simply reject the electors. I later learned that Mr. Eastman had conceded to my general counsel that rejecting electoral votes was a bad idea and any attempt to do so would be quickly overturned by a unanimous Supreme Court. This guy didn’t even believe what he was telling the president.

    Right before going to bed, I saw that the Trump campaign had issued a statement. The New York Times reported that I had told the president I didn’t believe I had the power to block congressional certification of the election. That was true, but the statement called it “fake news.” I had a feeling that Jan. 6, 2021, was going to be a very long day.

    Trump supporters protest inside the U.S. Capitol after breeching security in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021.PHOTO: BRENT STIRTON/GETTY IMAGES

    I rose early that day and worked on my statement to Congress. When the phone rang a little after 11 a.m., it was the president. “Despite the press release you issued last night,” I said, “I have always been forthright with you, Mr. President.” I reiterated that I didn’t believe I had the power to decide which electoral votes would count and said I would be issuing a statement to Congress confirming that before the joint session started.

    The president laid into me. “You’ll go down as a wimp,” he said. “If you do that, I made a big mistake five years ago!”

    But when he said, “You’re not protecting our country, you’re supposed to support and defend our country!” I calmly reminded him, “We both took an oath to support and defend the Constitution.”

    As I headed to the Capitol, President Trump took the stage. He told the crowd: “I hope Mike is going to do the right thing. I hope so. I hope so. Because if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election.” Repeating the argument made by the crank lawyers standing just offstage, he said, “All he has to do, all this is, this is from the No. 1, or certainly one of the top, constitutional lawyers in our country. . . . All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.”

    As our motorcade arrived at the Capitol, I saw thousands of protesters standing peacefully on the East Lawn. I felt compassion for all the good people who had traveled to Washington having been told that the outcome of the election could be changed. They cheered as we entered. I turned to my daughter and sighed: “God bless those people. They’re gonna be so disappointed.”

    I had no idea that what was later described as a “wall of people” had formed about a block west of the Capitol. As I led senators onto the House floor, the mood was solemn. There was no indication of the mayhem unfolding outside. Speaker Nancy Pelosi gaveled the chamber into session a little after 1 p.m.

    When the electoral votes for Arizona were opened, Rep. Paul Gosar rose to raise the first objection of the day, co-sponsored by 60 representatives. When I asked if the motion had a Senate sponsor, Ted Cruz rose. I adjourned the joint session and accompanied senators back to their chamber, still oblivious to the riot outside.

    Forty minutes into the session, Republican James Lankford of Oklahoma had the floor when the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, seated a few feet in front of me, leaned back in her chair and whispered: “Mr. Vice President, protesters have breached the building’s doors on the first floor. Just informing you.”

    A member of my Secret Service detail walked onto the Senate floor, straight to my chair, and said, “Mr. Vice President, we gotta go.” I was confident that the U.S. Capitol Police would soon have the situation in hand, so I told him we’d wait in the nearby ceremonial office reserved for my use as president of the Senate.

    Soon my lead Secret Service agent, Timothy Giebels, walked into that crowded office and said, “Sir, we’ve got to get you out of the building.” The protesters who had smashed their way into the House side of the Capitol were heading for the Senate. I later learned that many had come looking for me.

    I told my detail that I wasn’t leaving my post. Mr. Giebels pleaded for us to leave. The rioters had reached our floor. I pointed my finger at his chest and said, “You’re not hearing me, I’m not leaving! I’m not giving those people the sight of a 16-car motorcade speeding away from the Capitol.”

    “OK,” he answered in a voice that made it clear that it wasn’t. “Well, we can’t stay here. This office only has a glass door, and we can’t protect you.”

    My daughter Charlotte, sensing my frustration, asked, “Isn’t there somewhere else dad can go that is still in the Capitol?” Mr. Giebels said we could move to the loading dock and garage, a few stories below. I agreed.

    The steps were secured. We walked out into the hall slowly. All around us was a blur of motion and chaos: security and police officers directing people to safety, staffers shouting and running for shelter. I heard footsteps and angry chanting. Making our way to the basement of the Capitol took a few extra minutes because I insisted that we walk, not run. The Secret Service team grudgingly accommodated me.

    Arriving in the loading dock, we saw that our motorcade had been repositioned, with all the cars pointed toward a ramp leading out. Mr. Giebels began to escort us toward our cars. I stopped and said, “I’m not getting in the car.”

    “Sir,” he replied, “we’re just going to have you wait in the car, but we are not leaving the Capitol.”

    “Tim, I believe you,” I said. “You’re a man of integrity, but you’re not driving that car.” I knew that if we got into the car, somebody would tell the driver to get us out of the building.

    We had no television in the garage, so my staff and security team briefed me on the situation using police radio communications and Twitter. The House and Senate leaders had been whisked away to a secure location off Capitol Hill, but other members were barricaded in the House chamber as Capitol Police worked to hold back the mob.

    My unflappable assistant Zach Bauer walked up sheepishly and handed me his phone. The president had sent a tweet at 2:24 p.m.: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!”

    Rioters were ransacking the Capitol. Some of them, I was later told, were chanting, “Hang Mike Pence!” I ignored the tweet and got back to work.

    My chief of staff arranged for a conference call with the congressional leadership. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell made the point that it was imperative Congress reconvene as soon as possible to complete the vote count. Everyone agreed.

    By 2:38 p.m., it appeared that cooler heads had prevailed at the White House. The president tweeted, “Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!” A half hour later, he urged the rioters to “remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order—respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue.” At 4:17 p.m., the president issued a video telling the rioters, “I know your pain, I know your hurt . . . but you have to go home now, we have to have peace.”

    By 7 p.m., we had been cleared to return to my office. When the session reconvened, everything changed. Many lawmakers withdrew support for objections that had been properly filed. Beyond the violence and destruction, the Jan. 6 rioters had managed to end the debate over election irregularities. At around 3:40 a.m., Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota read the results of the 2020 election.

    I met with the president on Jan. 11. He looked tired, and his voice seemed fainter than usual. “How are you?” he began. “How are Karen and Charlotte?” I replied tersely that we were fine and told him that they had been at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He responded with a hint of regret, “I just learned that.” He then asked, “Were you scared?”

    “No,” I replied, “I was angry. You and I had our differences that day, Mr. President, and seeing those people tearing up the Capitol infuriated me.”

    He started to bring up the election, saying that people were angry, but his voice trailed off.

    I told him he had to set that aside, and he responded quietly, “Yeah.”

    I said, “Those people who broke into the Capitol might’ve been supporters, but they are not our movement.” For five years, we had both spoken to crowds of the most patriotic, law-abiding, God-fearing people in the country.

    With genuine sadness in his voice, the president mused: “What if we hadn’t had the rally? What if they hadn’t gone to the Capitol?” Then he said, “It’s too terrible to end like this.”

    On Jan. 14, the day after President Trump was impeached for the second time, I stopped by the Oval Office. The night before, he had unequivocally denounced the violence at the Capitol and called for calm and national unity. I congratulated him on his address. “I knew you’d like it,” he said. He seemed discouraged, so I reminded him that I was praying for him.

    “Don’t bother,” he said.

    As I stood to leave, he said, “It’s been fun.”

    “A privilege, Mr. President,” I answered.

    “Yeah, with you.”

    Walking toward the door leading to the hallway, I paused, looked the president in the eye, and said, “I guess we will just have to disagree on two things.”

    “What?”

    I referred to our disagreement about Jan. 6 and then said, “I’m also never gonna stop praying for you.”

    He smiled: “That’s right—don’t ever change.”

    y Last Days With Donald Trump

    I supported legitimate challenges to the 2020 vote counts. I also recognized that the Constitution didn’t give me authority to override the voters—and I followed my conscience on Jan. 6.

    via WSJ

  • Kari Lake Goes on with Tucker Carlson and Brings INCREDIBLE NEWS!

    Kari Lake Goes on with Tucker Carlson and Brings INCREDIBLE NEWS!

    BREAKING: Kari Lake Goes on with Tucker Carlson and Brings INCREDIBLE NEWS! (VIDEO)

    Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake joined Tucker Carlson on Wednesday night.

    Kari told Tucker Carlson that they will start to see the election going in her direction.

    And Kari dropped some incredible news on the 650,000 remaining ballots that need to be counted.

    Kari Lake:  Well I feel 100% certain I am going to win.  The question is how big will that win be?  Can you believe this, Tucker?  We still hve 650,000 votes that have not been counted.  And guess who these voters are?   They’re the people who showed up on election day.  They’re the people, 275,000 of them are people who brought their ballot to polls on election day  because they don’t trust the mail and they don’t trust the drop boxes.  So guess who those voters are?  They’re our voters.  And we’re only down by a few thousand votes right now.  When those votes come in we’re going to see a lot of liberal minds kind of blowing up.

    TRENDING: BREAKING: Kari Lake Goes on with Tucker Carlson and Brings INCREDIBLE NEWS! (VIDEO)

    via The Gateway Pundit https://ift.tt/Q50ZMSL

    November 10, 2022 at 06:02AM

  • Poll Worker Pushing People To Vote For Democrats In Indiana- Busted

    Poll Worker Pushing People To Vote For Democrats In Indiana- Busted

    A poll worker in Indiana has been removed by election officials after they were caught marking voters’ ballots for Democrat candidates and pressuring citizens to vote for specific candidates the Slay reported.

    The poll worker, identified as James Zheng, was caught pre-selecting Democrat candidates on voters’ ballots at a location in Carmel, Indiana.

    In one incident, Zheng reportedly filled out a ballot by voting “straight Democrat Party” when a voter asked for assistance.

    Beth Sheller, an election administrator for Hamilton County, told Fox News that an inspector report allegedly identified two separate incidents involving Zheng.

    The incidents may constitute electioneering and election interference, Sheller revealed.

    Zheng is accused of telling black voters “… not to vote for the racist candidates outside,” according to Chalkboard Review, where officials first identified the accused poll worker.

    According to the report, the first incident happened on Thursday evening after the poll worker told a pair of black voters not to vote for pro-parent school board candidates.

    He alleged that the candidates were “racist” after encountering a group of education activists outside the polling station.

    After casting their ballots, the pair of voters explained their interaction with the poll worker to the activists.

    According to the inspector report, the second incident involved potential election interference.

    Sheller confirmed the Chalkboard Review report that Zheng allegedly pre-selected a straight-Democrat ticket for a voter under the guise of “explaining the voting machines.”

    Several voters made allegations to their local election judges that Zheng was using the same tactic on their ballots, some of whom “didn’t know how to change it back.”

    In a press release obtained by Chalkboard Review, Mario Massillamany, GOP chairman in Hamilton County, said that the election administrator removed Zheng from working at the early voting site.

    They also prevented him from returning to the station on Friday and Monday.

    “This should serve as a cautionary reminder that those desperate to hold onto power or gain power will do anything – including breaking the law – to thwart the efforts of parents and taxpayers to replace our school boards with officials who more accurately reflect the values of our community,” Massillamany said.

    “If you see something suspicious, please report such activity immediately to a poll worker or other election official immediately.”

    Fox News reports Dayna Colbert, Hamilton County Democrats chair, was contacted to provide a replacement poll worker.

    Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office has reportedly begun investigating the accusations.

    Sheller told Chalkboard Review that she hopes to see Zheng prosecuted for both aspects of misconduct.

    She also vowed to ensure with a bipartisan team of judges and election officials that “no electioneering” signs and limits were posted at that location before polls opened.

    “I have never seen anything like this,” she said.

  • Republicans Seek Information From Twitter About The Platform’s Participation In Election Interference In 2020

    Republicans Seek Information From Twitter About The Platform’s Participation In Election Interference In 2020

    Following his takeover of the social media giant Twitter, Republicans have asked billionaire Elon Musk to turn over information related to Twitter’s handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story.

    Saying Twitter decided “to limit information that may have affected the 2020 election” when it pushed back or suppressed news about the laptop, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., wrote in a letter that he hoped Twitter’s new leadership would “correct” the “error” and “provide Americans with transparency.”

    Committee on Oversight and Reform Republicans are investigating the Biden family’s pattern of influence peddling to enrich themselves and President Biden’s involvement in these schemes,” Comer wrote to Musk in the letter dated Oct. 28. “As part of this investigation, Committee Republicans are reviewing the role Big Tech — including Twitter — played in supporting the Biden campaign in 2020 by suppressing certain stories implicating the Bidens.”

    Comer writes in the letter that he and fellow GOP lawmakers on the committee already wrote Twitter’s then-CEO Parag Agrawal back in April, asking the social media company to “preserve all documents and communications in Twitter’s custody referring or relating to the October 2020 New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop.”

    Agrawal and Twitter, according to Comer, did not respond to that request. Musk fired Agrawal shortly after his takeover.

    Since Musk has, according to Comer, pledged to make Twitter a place “where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner,” GOP members hope Twitter’s new leader will be more cooperative with their efforts.

    We believe open communication and access to information is a fundamental principle for any free people, and the American people deserve to know the reason Twitter suppressed or censored the Biden laptop story shortly before the 2020 election,” Comer’s letter reads

    President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, has been under investigation since 2018 for his involvement in business deals with countries like China and Ukraine. He soon may face federal charges.

    The Hunter Biden laptop story focused on obtained emails that detailed how President Biden’s son was allegedly leveraging his access to top policymakers in potential overseas business deals. The emails were pulled from a laptop supposedly belonging to Hunter.

    Initially, intelligence experts and others called the initial reports of Hunter Biden’s laptop “Russian disinformation,” leading to a media campaign against the report first published by the New York Post.

    Both Twitter and Facebook banned the dissemination of the story, with Twitter calling the content problematic because it was “obtained through hacking” and “contains private information.”

    Quickly following the New York Post’s publication of the story, Twitter prohibited users from sharing it and locked the Post’s Twitter account,” Comer’s letter to Musk states. “Twitter censors met any attempts to share the story’s link with a notice that said, ‘[w]e can’t complete this request because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful.’”

    Twitter unilaterally decided—without any evidence—that the story was untrue. Only after the election did the New York Times and the Washington Post admit the laptop was authentic,” Comer’s letter continued. “Committee Republicans are concerned Twitter inappropriately censored the Hunter Biden laptop story to influence the 2020 Presidential Election.”

    Comer and GOP lawmakers are asking Musk to turn over “all documents and communications” regarding Twitter’s response to the Hunter Biden laptop story as soon as possible, but “no later” than Nov. 11.

    Back in April, Musk said that he thought “suspending the Twitter account of a major news organization for publishing a truthful story was obviously incredibly inappropriate,” in a tweet.

    Billionaire Elon Musk, who is in the final stages of acquiring social media giantTwitter, is weighing in on the platform’s previous censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop storyleading up to the 2020 presidential election.

    Musk has previously stated his desire to own the social media giant stems from his criticism of Twitter’s free speech practices. The billionaire has been a vocal critic of Twitter’s perceived flaws when it comes to free speech. Now that he has taken over, it seems the GOP is hoping he can aid them in their investigation.

  • MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle clashes with Gov. Kathy Hochul over crime in New York: ‘We don’t feel safe’

    MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle clashes with Gov. Kathy Hochul over crime in New York: ‘We don’t feel safe’

    Hochul has said that voter concerns about crime were part of a GOP ‘conspiracy’- showing how out of touch the elite politicians are with the American people.

    MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle challenged Gov. Kathy Hochul on crime during an MSNBC appearance on Friday and insisted New Yorkers do not feel safe. 

    MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle pressed Gov. Kathy Hochul on crime and her plans to address it in New York City during an appearance on MSNBC on Friday, insisting New Yorkers don’t feel safe.  

    After Hochul touted getting guns off the streets in New York and her partnership with New York City Mayor Eric Adams, Ruhle interrupted and emphasized that people do not feel good about crime in New York.  

    “Okay, I’m gonna interrupt you then. Here’s the problem. We don’t feel safe. You might be working closely with Mayor Adams, you may have spent a whole lot of money. But I walked into my pharmacy, and everything is on lockdown because of shoplifters. I am not going into the subway. People do not feel safe in this town. So you may have done these things, but right now, we’re not feeling good. Where worried we could be San Francisco,” Ruhle said. 

    Hochul argued that New York City would never become San Francisco and said homicides and shootings have gone down “dramatically” from 2021. Hochul also said crime was an issue across the U.S. 

    “It doesn’t matter what’s happening in other cities, or other states. The reason people don’t feel safe in New York, is why they are starting to say, can Kathy Hochul be the right governor? Right? It doesn’t really matter what’s happening in Pennsylvania or San Francisco, you need to get New Yorkers’ votes and safety is a top issue for us,” Ruhle said. 

    Hochul said she understood these concerns and that she took the subway that morning.  

    “I understand the sense of anxiety. And that’s why a part of it is getting people who are severely ill out of the subways. Because you don’t know if they’re gonna have an episode. Something happens, they push somebody. That’s the fear of the unknown. We have to get them out of there, we’re doing it right now. Cameras, when you’re on a subway, the perpetrators now know they’re being watched, there’s a record of it. That’s going to start having a return effect,” Hochul said. 

    Hochul previously suggested voter concerns about crime and safety in certain states were part of a GOP “conspiracy.”

    “These are master manipulators,” Hochul said, referring to Republicans. “They have this conspiracy going all across America trying to convince people that in Democratic states that they’re not as safe. Well guess what? They’re also not only election deniers, they’re data deniers,” she said. 

    She said Democratic cities and states were “safer.”

    Congressman and Republican New York gubernatorial candidate Lee Zeldin attends the annual Columbus Day parade in New York City, Oct. 10, 2022. 

    Zeldin tweeted a picture of the front page of the New York Post on Friday, which showed a homeless man with 25 prior arrests who was accused of raping a jogger in New York City’s West Village, and told his followers to “vote like your life depends on it.” 

  • FBI Swoops In As Suspicious Package Sent To Kari Lake’s Offices

    FBI Swoops In As Suspicious Package Sent To Kari Lake’s Offices

    November 7, 2022 at 06:05AM FBI Swoops In As Suspicious Package Sent To Kari Lake’s Offices


    The campaign for governor of Arizona has gotten intense and now it has gotten terrifying.

    The FBI is investigating a suspicious package that was sent to Republican candidate Kari Lake’s campaign offices, The Daily Mail reported.

    Law enforcement was at the offices in Phoenix from 10pm to 5am after Lake’s team was sent two envelopes with the substance and abusive messages.

    Advertisement

    Her campaign believes this was a ‘terroristic attack, trying to intimidate Kari and the campaign staff’. 

    “Yesterday, one of Kari’s staffers opened up an envelope that had a suspicious white powder in it and had a letter in there with a bunch of vulgarities and ranting and raving about Kari,” a source close to the campaign said.

    “The employee then noticed second package that was exactly like the first one she had opened and she reported it,” the source said.

    The FBI, a hazmat team and bomb squad responded to the scene and the FBI took the substance.

    “Officers responded to a found property call at an office building near 40th Street and Camelback Road. When officers arrived they learned there were suspicious items located inside the mail. Additional resources responded to collect the items and secure the area,” Phoenix Police Department Sergeant Phil Krynsky said.

    “There have been no reports of injury and the investigation remains active,” he said.

    Lake has a secret for Wyoming GOP Rep. Liz Cheney. Lake revealed that Cheney’s $500,000 smear campaign against her has actually helped her campaign.

    Lake trolled Cheney by sending her a “thank you” letter for her $500,000 ad buy against Lake. She jokingly called “the Cheney anti-endorsement the gift that keeps on giving.”

    Cheney, who was blown out in the Wyoming primary in August and will be out of office in a few months, has begun supporting Democrats running against Republicans in several races. Cheney’s Great Task PAC announced on Friday it would spend more than $500,000 on broadcast and online ads against Arizona Republican candidates Lake and Mark Finchem, the GOP secretary of state nominee.

    “You have a candidate for Governor, Kari Lake, you have a candidate for Secretary of State, Mark Finchem, both of whom have said that they will only honor the results of an election if they agree with it,” Cheney said in the ad. “And if you care about the survival of our Republic, we cannot give people power who will not honor elections.”

    In the letter to Cheney, which was addressed to “Defeated Member of Congress,” Lake noted that Cheney’s ad buys led to “skyrocketing” campaign donations and increased website traffic.

    Lake said: “Thank you for your generous in-kind contribution to my campaign. Your recent television ad urging Arizonans not to vote for me is doing just the opposite. Our campaign donations are skyrocketing and our website nearly crashed from traffic as people rushed to learn more about my plan to put Arizona First and join our historic political movement.”

    “In fact, my team tells me your commercial should add another 10 points to our lead,” Lake added. “I guess that’s why they call the Cheney anti-endorsement the gift that keeps on giving.”

    “While we appreciate your in-kind contribution, the $500,000 ad buy likely exceeds Arizona’s $5,300 individual contribution limit,” Lake noted.

    “Thank you again for the huge boost to our campaign! Enjoy your forced retirement from politics,” Lake concluded. “I know America will rest easier knowing that one more warmonger is out of office.”

    Advertisement

    The letter ended with a postscript that read, “Make Arizona Great Again!”

    During an appearance earlier this week on Fox News, Lake spoke with host Tucker Carlson about how Cheney’s anti-Trump efforts have only helped her campaign.

    Carlson asked: “I’ve never voted for a Democrat. Well, of course, Liz Cheney is a left-wing Democrat who won’t stop lying. So, in response to that ad, Kari Lake wrote this letter to Liz Cheney, it begins: ‘Dear Liz, thank you for your generous in-kind contribution to my campaign. Your recent TV ad urging Arizonans not to vote for me is doing just the opposite. Our donations are skyrocketing and our website nearly crashed from the traffic.’ Kari Lake is running for governor of Arizona, as noted, she joins us tonight. Kari Lake, thanks so much for coming on. Is that true?”

    Lake didn’t mince her words with her response.

    “That’s true. Liz Cheney is now officially my biggest fundraiser to date. We’ve raised a half million dollars since she did the anti-endorsement and people still flocking to our website KariLake.com and donating. It’s been an incredible boom for us in fundraising, so I have to extend a big thank you to Liz. At this rate, Tucker, we might have to invite her to our inaugural ball because we’ll have to thank her for bringing in so much fundraising money for us,” Lake began.

    “I’m dangerous to people like Liz Cheney and the folks that she hangs out with and they want to stop people like me,” Lake added.

    Those with an enlarged prostate do not know about this simple solution

    via Conservative Brief https://ift.tt/sUKhQAe

  • NBC Quietly Removes Report Claiming Paul Pelosi Walked Away From Police, “Did Not Immediately Declare” Emergency

    NBC Quietly Removes Report Claiming Paul Pelosi Walked Away From Police, “Did Not Immediately Declare” Emergency

    November 5, 2022 at 09:22AM NBC Quietly Removes Report Claiming Paul Pelosi Walked Away From Police, “Did Not Immediately Declare” Emergency

    The Paul Pelosi attack continues to grow more bizarre by the day.

    On Friday, sources familiar with the investigation told NBC News that when the police responded to the high-priority call, they had no idea they had been called to the Pelosi residence. What’s more, Pelosi did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home.

    “After a ‘knock and announce,’ the front door was opened by Mr. Pelosi. The 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home,” reports NBC. Instead, Pelosi “began walking several feet back into the foyer toward the assailant and away from police.”

    What’s more, Pelosi and attacker David DePape were reportedly alone for 30 minutes.

    Of note, NBC News has deleted the clip from their Twitter feed and scrubbed it  from their website.

    Meanwhile, a neighbor living across from the Pelosis who was awake when the assault took place didn’t hear an alarm or anything unusual.

    “No, not a thing, and you know we were awake at that hour in the morning; my husband was awake. We didn’t even hear sirens,” neighbor Sally McNulty told The Epoch Times.

    McNulty, who has lived in the neighborhood for 20 years, said everything was quiet around the time of the 2 a.m. attack on Oct. 28.

    “This is one of the quietest streets in the city,” she said. “You can hear a pin drop at night.”

    McNulty said she doesn’t recall ever hearing the Pelosis’ alarm go off in the past, though she has occasionally heard others in the neighborhood.

    She said that Paul Pelosi had no enemies she knew of and was well-liked.

    Other neighbors declined to comment.

    Marjorie Campbell, a former neighbor of the Pelosis for 10 years, told the Daily Mail she recalled fleets of black SUVs surrounding the house around the clock when she stayed there.

    Everyone in the neighborhood has alarms on their windows, and if glass were smashed, an alarm would sound, she told the publication. Campbell recalled her computers getting scrambled by alleged security measures to protect the congresswoman.

    Nancy Pelosi was at her Pacific Heights home, the site of the attack, on Nov. 2 while several dark SUVs were parked outside. Capitol Police were present, too, as were multiple San Francisco Police Department cars.

    Paul Pelosi had surgery to address a skull fracture and other injuries at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, after 42-year-old David DePape allegedly fractured his skull with a hammer on Oct. 28.

    DePape pleaded not guilty to an attempted murder charge during a brief appearance in San Francisco Superior Court on Nov. 1. -Epoch Times

    As PJ Media reports,

    Pelosi’s failure to call out for help or flee his home was a detail in the court filing that previously raised a red flag to me, and it seems that even NBC News finds it odd. “Why Pelosi didn’t try to flee or tell responding officers he was in distress is unclear,” NBC News’s Miguel Almaguer noted.

    Nevertheless, the report suggested it was unknown whether Pelosi was already injured or what mental state he was in.

    ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

    Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

    via www.zerohedge.com https://ift.tt/PuqNCfI

  • Voter Fraud Busted In Florida Days Ahead Of Midterms

    Voter Fraud Busted In Florida Days Ahead Of Midterms

    The Florida Department of Law Enforcement’s Election Crime Unit announced it has arrested Cheryl Ann Leslie, 55, for casting her vote in more than one state in previous elections, including 2020.

    FDLE says the two counts she was arrested on of casting more than one ballot are both third-degree felonies. The Secretary of State’s Office of Election Crimes and Security assisted in investigating Leslie.

    Authorities said Leslie is a physician assistant and voted in both the 2020 federal and primary elections in Florida in Alaska. For Alaska, they say she submitted an absentee ballot, and for Florida, in Palm Beach County by voting early in-person.

    Leslie reportedly said her work requires “extensive travel between states.”

    The information on Leslie’s activity was forwarded to the Election Crime Unit for further investigation. The woman was booked into the Palm Beach County Jail.

    “The Florida Department of State, Office of Election Crimes and Security is grateful for our partnership with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement,” said Secretary of State and Chief Election Officer Cord Byrd.  “This arrest is yet another confirmation to every eligible Florida voter that the Department of State and FDLE are working together to ensure the integrity of their vote and Florida’s elections process.”

    Gov. Ron DeSantis has made election security integral to his administration. He signed legislation in April to establish the Office of Election Crimes and Security within the Department of State. The office is in charge of reviewing reports of alleged election law violations and investigate any violations. The office oversees the department’s voter fraud hotline. 

    As November’s election nears, Byrd has also made clear a commitment to election integrity. Late October, his office announced he visited all of Florida’s 67 Supervisors of Elections to ensure the “highest standards of election integrity.”

    “Our state is committed to the highest standards of election integrity which is why I am proud to have completed visits with all 67 Supervisors of Elections,” said Byrd. “I was able to see firsthand their operations and the security measures they employ to safeguard the election in accordance with state law. The Supervisors are ready for this election, and now is the time for you to be election ready and go vote.”

    In August, DeSantis announced his election crimes unit announced multiple arrests for voter fraud.

    “And so they did not go through any process. They did not get their rights restored and yet they went ahead and voted anyways,” DeSantis said. “That is against the law and now they’re going to pay the price for it.”

    He praised the new Election Crimes and Security Office that investigates voter fraud and violations of election law. The new office received funding July 1 to operate.

    “I also want to be very clear going forward that we’re going to continue to make sure that our laws are rigorously enforced,” DeSantis said.

    Attorney General Ashley Moody applauded the state for enforcing its election laws.

    “In order for us to remain a country and a state under the rule of law, we must have men and women that are willing to enforce those laws,” Moody said.

    Moody called it heartbreaking that polls show 20% of Americans have faith in their elections.

    “That skepticism spans party lines and we cannot accept that,” Moody said.

  • Crazy Feminism! Democrats Can’t Define What A Woman Is, Now Write ‘Dear Women’ You Must Vote For Us

    Crazy Feminism! Democrats Can’t Define What A Woman Is, Now Write ‘Dear Women’ You Must Vote For Us

    It wasn’t too long ago that the Democrat’s official narrative was that there is no such thing as a woman, as even the first Black Woman who was placed on the US Supreme Court couldn’t define what a woman is and the same party demands we allow males to participate in female sports and use our bathrooms- because there is no such thing as a woman-we are all the same right?

    So isn’t it hypocritical that now the same losers in the Democrat Party want to plead with women for our votes?

    The hashtag #DearWoman is trending on social media just days ahead of the mid-terms with all of the usual suspects trying to exploit women. Most of the posts and memes at the hastag had to do with the obsession, a very small minority of the left have, that somehow they will mysterious get pregnant and then be forced to deliver a baby that will kill them.

    This is the radical left feminist movement gone totally insane.

    Remember only 5% of people answered a New York Times poll, recently that abortion was a top concern for them.

    Yet they persist…

    The UN was there…(Isn’t this foreign meddling in our elections?)

    Liberals were there:

    And apparently they know what a Uterus is:

    One of their favorite icons, the deceased SCOTUS judge- who has statements assigned to her that she may or may not have said, felt or believed- now that she can not defend herself the left uses her:

    Don. Jr. chimed in to show what a bunch of hypocrites the left are:

    And more of the imagery of rape and child sexual assault:

    https://twitter.com/Irma_Spikeymama/status/1588661167408697344?s=20&t=-eQ5r43v91VhqdoLdsufqw

    Remember this is the same party that promotes not know how to define a woman:

    As the confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson went into hour 13, Sen. Marsha Blackburn asked the Supreme Court nominee on Tuesday to define the word “woman.”

    “I can’t — ” Jackson replied.

    “You can’t?” Blackburn said.

    “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist,” Jackson said.

    “The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?” Blackburn asked.

    The Tennessee Republican’s line of questioning hit on nearly every political hot-button issue, from critical race theory to teaching children about gender identity in schools to Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer on the University of Pennsylvania’s women’s team.

    Jackson said her role as a judge would be to address disputes about a definition and to interpret the law.

    “The fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about,” Blackburn said, before turning to Thomas, who has been at the center of the debate over policies for transgender athletes.

    Blackburn asked what message allowing Thomas to compete sends to “girls who aspire to compete and win in sports?”“Senator, I’m not sure what message that sends. If you’re asking me about the legal issues related to it — those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the court,” Jackson said before Blackburn cut her off, to explain her view of what message this delivers to young women.

    “I think it tells our girls that their voices don’t matter,” Blackburn responded. “I think it tells them that they’re second-class citizens. And parents want to have a Supreme Court justice who is committed to preserving parental autonomy and protecting our nation’s children.”

    WATCH:

  • Violent Left! Man Arrested For Threatening To Kill Republican- Media Mostly Silent

    Violent Left! Man Arrested For Threatening To Kill Republican- Media Mostly Silent

    From the Chicago Sun-Times:

    Illinois State Police say Scott Lennox left Republican Darren Bailey a voicemail threatening to “mutilate and kill” him. “This went above and beyond anything that is acceptable, even in the realms of political discourse,” Cook County Circuit Court Judge Susana Ortiz said. “It simply will not be tolerated.”

    Prosecutors say anger over a political television commercial at a bar led a Chicago man to send Republican gubernatorial nominee Darren Bailey a voicemail threatening to mutilate and kill him and his family — a threat that also prompted a lockdown of downstate schools associated with the state senator and his family.

    Bail was set at $75,000 for Scott Lennox, 21, of 3300 N. Lake Shore Drive, who is charged with one felony count each of threatening a public official, telephone harassment and harassment by electronic communications, according to the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office.

    Cook County Circuit Court Judge Susana Ortiz on Wednesday also put Lennox on electronic monitoring and barred him from contacting Bailey, his family or any of his staffers.

    “This went above and beyond anything that is acceptable, even in the realms of political discourse,” Ortiz said at the hearing. “It simply will not be tolerated.”

    The violent voicemail came last Friday, the same day Paul Pelosi, the husband of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was attacked with a hammer in his San Francisco townhome by an intruder targeting the speaker.

    And according to Capitol Police data, cases related to “concerning statements and threats” against members of Congress more than doubled over the past few years, jumping from 3,939 in 2017 to 9,625 in 2021.

    The voicemail threat to Bailey followed a fight Lennox had at a Chicago bar after a political commercial appeared on the bar’s television. The ad — and repeated others he had seen during the campaign — made Lennox “angry,” prosecutors said, and a “heated argument” began between Lennox and his friends, leading him to send a voicemail to Bailey’s Springfield office, prosecutors said.

    “I’m going to skin Darren Bailey alive, making sure he is still alive, and I’m going to feed his f——— family to him as he is alive and screaming in f——— pain,” prosecutors say Lennox said in the voicemail. He also allegedly made statements about abortion in his message.

    He further said, “He is a piece of white a— racist s—-, and honestly if he doesn’t kill himself, I will. You know what? I know where he lives. I know where he sleeps. I know where his kids sleep. And I know the f——— school he works at,” prosecutors allege he said. Lennox also said “the candidate teaching all this mother f——— misinformation is going to die. So honestly he should just kill himself before anything else happens.”

    Lennox also said he didn’t like Gov. J.B. Pritzker but stated he didn’t like Bailey “even more.”

    “So f—- him for being a piece of s—-,” prosecutors claim Lennox said of Bailey in the voicemail. “So you know what? I am going to take anything and everything possible. You know what? I am going to make him scream. I am going to make him scream and suffer. Yeah, that’s right. So he better kill himself, and if he doesn’t, I am going to kill him.”

    The schools affiliated with Bailey and his family in southern Illinois were placed on soft lockdown. Bailey also was granted extra security detail and was told to avoid appearing in public as police investigated.

    Republican Darren Bailey pauses during a news conference in the West Loop in September.
    Republican Darren Bailey pauses during a news conference in the West Loop in September.

    According to a Chicago police report, Lennox left Bailey the voicemail at 10:27 p.m. Oct. 28. While Illinois Secretary of State Police did not immediately deem him to be a credible threat, further investigation by the Illinois State Police led police to pursue it.

    In an interview with police, Lennox allegedly allowed officers to see a Snapchat message he sent to friends, including one in which he bragged that he was a “political terrorist.” After telling a friend Bailey was on lockdown, he offered up three laughing face emojis, prosecutors said.

    To another friend, Lennox wrote, “I feel so f——— accomplished,” prosecutors said.

    Police said Lennox admitted making the threats. He was arrested at 10 p.m. Monday at his Chicago home.

    Bailey on Wednesday said “rhetoric” is leading to “hatred,” with a subtle reference to Democrats deeming him “too extreme” to lead Illinois in ads that have been running since the primary.

    “Divisive, inflammatory, and misleading rhetoric is driving hatred across our state as some attempt to label political opponents as dangerous threats,” the farmer from downstate Xenia said in a statement.

    Gov. J.B. Pritzker (left) and GOP rival Darren Bailey prepare to debate on Oct. 18.
    Gov. J.B. Pritzker (left) and GOP rival Darren Bailey prepare to debate on Oct. 18.

    “Whether we agree or disagree on policies, we are all Americans,” Bailey said. “I pray this young man gets the help he needs. We must bring our state together and fight for the safety and prosperity of every Illinoisan.”

    In their final televised debate, Pritzker repeatedly called Bailey an “extremist” who was “dangerous” for the state and “shouldn’t be let anywhere near the governor’s office.”

    But Bailey used similar language that night against Pritzker, dubbing the Democratic governor’s “woke ideology” as “extreme,” saying “his gender issues are so extreme” and his “extreme policies are destroying the city,” and telling Pritzker, “your incompetent and arrogant leadership is killing people.”

    But on Wednesday, Pritzker joined Bailey in denouncing the threat against his Republican opponent, tweeting that “the violent rhetoric and division we’re seeing across the country is unacceptable.”

    “Hatred in any form has no home in Illinois,” Pritzker tweeted.

    Illinois House Speaker Emanuel “Chris” Welch, state Senate President Don Harmon and state Comptroller Susana Mendoza also denounced the violent threat.