Tag: SBN

  • Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Day one of the Kari Lake election challenge investigating potential violations of the signature verification process in Maricopa County was off to a fiery start Wednesday, as Lake’s defense presented evidence most ballots were approved without review.

    The courtroom showdown comes as Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Thompson agreed to hear Lake’s arguments on the signature verification process this week after the Arizona Supreme Court sent the case back to lower courts in March.

    Check out highlights from Wednesday’s hearing below:


    Lake’s attorney Kurt Olsen argued it was not physically possible for 11 workers to have approved 170K signatures on ballots unless they were skipping steps.

    “This isn’t a question of not doing it well enough, Maricopa County simply isn’t doing signature verification,” Olsen later added.




    A whistleblower called to the stand as a witness who worked on election day testified she was sent home early during vote tallies despite ballots still needing to be cured.

    She added before being asked to leave she and other election workers were “catching signatures” that did not match.

    She further added some ballots she’d sent for re-review were sent back because review managers were bombarded with ballots.

    She added she and other workers felt pressured to approve ballots when they were sent back for re-review after having been rejected, saying, “We felt uncomfortable about approving what we had already rejected. We’d already went through them.”

    The whistleblower added that after normal level 1 signature verifiers were sent home early, the signature review process was continued at the County Recorder’s Office, where there were no observers.


    The court also saw damning surveillance footage from inside a ballot counting facility which showed election workers simply approving ballots without scrolling down on their computer monitor to actually verify signatures.

    The witness was subsequently asked about the video, to which she responded, “The person on the right was doing it correctly and the person on the left was not… there’s no possible way to click through that and be able to verify from the past history in order to verify that signature.”


    Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer defended the signature verification process.

    During the hearing, Richer tweeted a comment stating, “This moron doesn’t understand that we can do signature verification from any computer in our office.” He subsequently deleted the tweet which suggested that signature verification may have taken place without proper observer oversight.

    The admission in the deleted tweet was caught by Lake’s team.


    In a stunning admission by Maricopa County’s defense attorney, he admitted the employee seen in the video was fired, however there was no indication his workload was re-processed, meaning several ballots had no signature verification whatsoever.


    Witness Shelby Busch said she verified the video shown was authentic and showed what it was purported to show.


    Another whistleblower testified he was concerned about why there were only three level 2 signature verifiers, when there had been 40 level 1 workers.

    He also added he’d also been sent back ballots he’d rejected for re-review.

    Watch full segments from inside the courtroom below:

    Start below video at 59:18:

    Stay tuned tomorrow for updates from Day 2 of the two-day legal showdown.



    via Infowars

    May 18, 2023 at 07:21AM

  • Tax-Payer Funded $1.1 Billion U.S. Patriot Missile System in Ukraine “Likely Damaged” After Massive Russian Attack

    Tax-Payer Funded $1.1 Billion U.S. Patriot Missile System in Ukraine “Likely Damaged” After Massive Russian Attack

    Tax-Payer Funded $1.1 Billion U.S. Patriot Missile System in Ukraine “Likely Damaged” After Massive Russian Attack (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

    https://ift.tt/Rv0MDN3

    Patriot missile systems at Schwesing military airport, Germany (Source: Getty Images)

    Russia claimed it destroyed a US-made Patriot missile defense system worth about $1.1 billion during a massive overnight missile attack on Kyiv Monday night, CNN reported.

    Recall, on December 21, as part of President Zelenskyy’s visit to the White House, the Biden regime announced $1.85 billion in additional security assistance for Ukraine. This includes the authorization of a Presidential Drawdown of security assistance valued at up to $1 billion – the Patriot missile battery.

    The Patriot missile battery is a unique system designed to intercept incoming missiles and was delivered just last month to Ukraine by the US and its NATO allies.

    Russia bombarded Ukraine with the Kinzhal hypersonic missile, an air-launched ballistic missile that’s 10 times the speed of sound.

    It claimed it had obliterated the air defense system. The Russian Defense Ministry said through Telegram that “a high-precision strike by the Kinzhal hypersonic missile system in the city of Kyiv hit a US-made Patriot anti-aircraft missile system.”

    However, US officials refuted the claim and told CNN that it was likely damaged but not destroyed.

    CNN reported:

    A US-made Patriot air defense system was likely damaged, but not destroyed, as the result of a Russian missile barrage in and around Kyiv early Tuesday morning local time, a US official tells CNN.

    The US is still assessing to what degree the system was damaged, the official said. That will determine whether the system needs to be pulled back entirely or simply repaired on the spot by Ukrainians forces.

    A US National Security Council spokesperson referred CNN to the Ukrainian government for comment.

    Ukrainian officials said on Tuesday that they successfully intercepted all six hypersonic missiles fired by the Russians, but the Ukrainian military declined to comment on the Russians’ claim that a Patriot system was hit. “We cannot comment on this. We’ll stay out of commenting on Russian sources,” said the Ukrainian Air Force spokesman, Yurii Ihnat.

    Ukraine currently has two Patriot air defense systems in country, one donated by the US and the other donated jointly by Germany and the Netherlands. It is unclear which of those systems was potentially damaged, but taking one out of commission – even for a short period – could affect Ukraine’s ability to defend Kyiv amid intensifying Russian missile attacks.

    WATCH:

    via The Gateway Pundit

    May 17, 2023 at 07:22AM

  • ChatGPT’s Sam Altman Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee As Calls For AI Regulation Build

    ChatGPT’s Sam Altman Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee As Calls For AI Regulation Build

    May 16, 2023 at 05:13PM. Watch Live: ChatGPT’s Sam Altman Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee As Calls For AI Regulation Build

    Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, will testify before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee Tuesday morning as lawmakers prepare regulations for new artificial intelligence tools released for consumers.

    “Artificial intelligence urgently needs rules and safeguards to address its immense promise and pitfalls,” Connecticut Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, wrote in a statement.

    “This hearing begins our Subcommittee’s work in overseeing and illuminating AI’s advanced algorithms and powerful technology. I look forward to working with my colleagues as we explore sensible standards and principles to help us navigate this uncharted territory,” Blumenthal said. 

    “Artificial intelligence will be transformative in ways we can’t even imagine, with implications for Americans’ elections, jobs, and security,” Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, who also chairs the Senate panel on privacy and technology, said. He added:

    “This hearing marks a critical first step towards understanding what Congress should do.”

    Besides Altman, the hearing will include testimony from:

    • Gary Marcus, Professor Emeritus at New York University; and
    • Christina Montgomery, Vice President and Chief Privacy and Trust Officer at IBM.

    The surging popularity of AI tools like ChatGPT, which allow users to generate responses via text or images, has received calls from the “Godfather of AI,” Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio and others about the existential risk AI systems pose to the economy and humans.

    In recent weeks, the Biden administration unveiled a series of measures to tackle the increased use of AI technology. The Department of Commerce has initiated a process to gather feedback on potential regulations.

    There is no question that AI will be transformative in many ways for companies that integrate this technology into their systems. One long-term effect it might cause is a massive layoff wave this decade. Goldman’s latest report (available to pro subscribers in the usual place) indicates up to 300 million jobs are at risk across the Western world.

    And BCA Research’s latest report on AI has an ominous outlook about the technology:

    “The safety risks around AI are huge, and we think there is a more than 50/50 chance AI will wipe out all of humanity by the middle of the century.” 

    The next step for lawmakers on Capitol Hill is some form of regulation of AI. However, those next steps need to be clarified.

    *   *   *

    Watch Here

    Loading…

    via Zerohedge

  • DOJ Requests IRS remove investigative team from Hunter Biden probe in move whistleblower claims is ‘clearly retaliatory’

    DOJ Requests IRS remove investigative team from Hunter Biden probe in move whistleblower claims is ‘clearly retaliatory’

    May 16, 2023 at 06:47AM  IRS removes investigative team from Hunter Biden probe in move whistleblower claims is ‘clearly retaliatory’

    WASHINGTON — The IRS on Monday removed the “entire investigative team” from its long-running tax fraud probe of first son Hunter Biden in alleged retaliation against the whistleblower who recently contacted Congress to allege a coverup in the case, The Post has learned.

    The purge allegedly was done on the orders of the Justice Department, the whistleblower’s attorneys informed congressional leaders in a letter.

    “Today the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Supervisory Special Agent we represent was informed that he and his entire investigative team are being removed from the ongoing and sensitive investigation of the high-profile, controversial subject about which our client sought to make whistleblower disclosures to Congress. He was informed the change was at the request of the Department of Justice,” Mark Lytle and Tristan Leavitt wrote.

    The whistleblower, who supervised the Hunter Biden probe since early 2020, hasn’t publicly identified the first son as the subject of the case he says is being brushed under the rug, but congressional sources confirmed it.

    “On April 27, 2023, IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel appeared before the House Committee on Ways and Means. He testified: ‘I can say without any hesitation there will be no retaliation for anyone making an allegation or a call to a whistleblower hotline.’ However, this move is clearly retaliatory and may also constitute obstruction of a congressional inquiry,” the lawyers went on.

    An IRS whistleblower who supervised the tax fraud investigation of Hunter Biden was reassigned Monday.
    The Washington Post via Getty Im

    “Our client has a right to make disclosures to Congress … He is protected by 5 U.S.C. § 2302 from retaliatory personnel actions—including receiving a ‘significant change in duties, responsibilities, or working conditions’ (which this clearly is) because of his disclosures to Congress.

    “Any attempt by any government official to prevent a federal employee from furnishing information to Congress is also a direct violation of longstanding appropriations restriction. Furthermore, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 makes it a crime to obstruct an investigation of Congress,” Lytle and Leavitt wrote.

    The whistleblower’s team added: “We respectfully request that you give this matter your prompt attention. Removing the experienced investigators who have worked this case for years and are now the subject-matter experts is exactly the sort of issue our client intended to blow the whistle on to begin with.”

    Hunter Biden gives journalists a thumbs up Monday during the college graduation of his daughter Maisy.
    AFP via Getty Images

    The IRS and Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Hunter Biden’s legal team and the White House also did not immediately respond.

    The whistleblower’s representatives declined to comment further.

    Hunter, 53, is under investigation for not paying taxes on millions in largely foreign-sourced income.

    He was in good spirits Monday and gave journalists a thumbs-up while seated near his dad at the graduation ceremony for his daughter Maisy from the University of Pennsylvania.

    The first son wrote in communications retrieved from his abandoned laptop that he paid up to “half” of his income to his father and Hunter frequently involved then-Vice President Biden in his international business relationships.

    The whistleblower was ousted from the investigation, along with an unknown number of subordinates, at roughly the same time as the Justice Department released a long-awaited report by special counsel John Durham detailing bias in the FBI’s investigation of former President Donald Trump’s alleged links to Russia. The more than 300-page report dominated the evening’s news coverage.

    The IRS whistleblower emerged last month when Lytle informed Congress that his client wanted to share information about “preferential treatment” in the Hunter Biden case and alleged false testimony to Congress by Attorney General Merrick Garland, who repeatedly assured lawmakers that Delaware US Attorney David Weiss can unilaterally make charging decisions in the investigation.

    Leavitt, president of the group Empower Oversight, later joined as co-counsel.


    IRS commissioner Daniel Werfel

    IRS commissioner Daniel Werfel told Congress that his agency won’t retaliate against whistleblowers.
    ZUMAPRESS.com

    The informant, who has yet to appear at the Capitol, already made disclosures to inspectors general at the Justice and Treasury departments.

    Just one week after the whistleblower stepped forward, Hunter’s attorneys met with Justice Department leaders in a sign that a charging decision may come soon in the tax fraud investigation that reportedly began in 2018.

    NBC reported last month that there was “growing frustration” within the FBI over the fact that Weiss, a Trump administration holdover recommended to his post by Delaware’s two Democratic senators, had not yet brought charges against Hunter Biden after the bureau concluded most of its work last year.

    A different whistleblower informed Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) this month that the FBI has an informant file from 2020 alleging that Joe Biden accepted bribes as vice president. House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) issued a subpoena for it, but last week the FBI refused to give the document to Congress.

    Hunter confirmed he was under investigation for tax fraud shortly after his father won the 2020 election and he reportedly borrowed about $2 million last year to pay off back taxes, though doing so doesn’t legally absolve him of the original non-payment.

    The federal investigation reportedly has looked at whether Hunter laundered money, violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act and lied about his drug use on a gun-purchase form.

    House Republicans, meanwhile, are investigating President Biden’s role in his family’s overseas dealings, through which Hunter Biden and first brother James earned millions from partnerships with wealthy people in countries where their powerful relative held sway.

    Joe Biden met with his relatives’ business associates on many occasions — including those from China, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Russia and Ukraine — and House Republicans allege that Biden family members offered no legitimate business services and were merely selling access to the US government.

    via New York Post

  • READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE FULL REPORT

    Special Counsel John Durham released his final, 306-page report investigating the FBI’s probe into former President Donald Trump’s alleged links to Russia.

    The report was released almost exactly four years since the investigation was launched, on the order of Attorney General Bill Barr, in 2019.

     
    FILE – Special counsel John Durham, the prosecutor appointed to investigate potential government wrongdoing in the early days of the Trump-Russia probe, leaves federal court in Washington, May 16, 2022. Durham ended his four-year investigation into possible FBI misconduct in its probe of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The report Monday, May 15, 2023, from Durham offers withering criticism of the bureau but a meager court record that fell far short of the former president’s prediction he would uncover the “crime of the century.” (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

    Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

    The report offers criticism of the FBI, finding that it caused “severe reputational harm” in its handling of the case, which was “seriously deficient” at key spots. Durham wrote that the FBI embraced “seriously flawed information” that fell short of the agency’s “own principles regarding objectivity and integrity.”

    Durham also alleged hypocrisy on the FBI’s part, noting the contrast between its handling of accusations regarding foreign meddling in Trump and Hillary Clinton’s campaigns.

    He found that the Steele Dossier, the casus beli for the investigation, was deeply flawed, and the FBI was unable to corroborate “a single substantive allegation. The agency went through with the investigation despite “a complete lack of information from the Intelligence Community that corroborated the hypothesis upon which the… investigation was predicated.”

    via Washington Examiner

    May 15, 2023 at 05:13PM

  • RADIOACTIVE PANIC: Russians Missiles Hit Ukrainian Ammunition Depot in Khmelnytsky Causing Massive Explosion – Cache of British Depleted Uranium Tank Shells Destroyed – Gamma Radiation Spikes in the Region’s Atmosphere

    RADIOACTIVE PANIC: Russians Missiles Hit Ukrainian Ammunition Depot in Khmelnytsky Causing Massive Explosion – Cache of British Depleted Uranium Tank Shells Destroyed – Gamma Radiation Spikes in the Region’s Atmosphere

    May 15, 2023 at 07:29AM   RADIOACTIVE PANIC: Russians Missiles Hit Ukrainian Ammunition Depot in Khmelnytsky Causing Massive Explosion – Cache of British Depleted Uranium Tank Shells Destroyed – Gamma Radiation Spikes in the Region’s Atmosphere | The Gateway Pundit | by Paul Serran

    The West’s proxy war against Russia in the Ukraine has led to progressively more deadly weapons systems and ammunition to be delivered to Zelensky’s Nazi regime.

    Possibly, the most controversial of these deliveries are the deadly radioactive shells for Challenger 2 tanks that the British government has given Ukraine.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr commented on Instagram:

    “In another reckless escalation, Britain has confirmed delivery of depleted uranium munitions to Ukraine. DU munitions should be banned. They partially vaporize on impact, poisoning the environment with uranium dust that causes cancer and horrific birth defects.”

    IMG_0368

    On Saturday, during a massive air and missile raid on Ukraine, Russian forces hit a ammunition depot in Khmelnytsky, in the western part of the country, causing  gigantic explosions in the site.

    Intel Slava reported:

    “It is worth noting that panic reports are spreading in Ukrainian social networks that during the detonation of an ammunition depot in Khmelnytsky, a large batch of British tank ammunition with depleted uranium, which was recently brought to Ukraine along with Storm Shadow missiles, was also destroyed. As a result of a huge explosion, particles of depleted uranium could be dispersed on the territory of the Khmelnytsky region, which, taking into account the experience of Yugoslavia and Iraq, could lead to an outbreak of cancer in the medium term.”

    IMG_0724

    It didn’t take long for the results of the impact to be measurable scientifically.

    Slavyangrad on Telegram:

    “A clear spike in gamma radiation was detected in Khmelnitsky on or about May 12th, with emission continuing to rise the following day and remaining at the elevated level thereafter.

    Considering how little gamma radiation comes from depleted uranium, this clear spike in gamma radiation in Khmelnitsky indicates that there was very large stockpile of the DU munitions that was destroyed, raising the uranium dust into the air.

    By comparison, the towns of Ternopol, Khmilnik, and Novaya Ushitsa remained at their apparent regular, base levels. This indicates that the Khmelnitsky anomaly is indeed a spike and corroborates the claim that the stockpile in Khmelnitsky contained DU munitions.”

    While the UK authorities dismissed the danger posed by this kinds of shells, the experience in Yugoslavia and Iraq has shown how deadly in the medium term these vaporized depleted uranium shells can be.

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    WASHINGTON—House Republicans appear split on whether to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee that seeks a document with whistleblower allegations that now-President Joe Biden received a bribe from a foreign official.

    In a May 3 letter to Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chairman of the Oversight Committee, and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote that they “have received legally protected and highly credible unclassified whistleblower disclosures.

    “Based on those disclosures, it has come to our attention that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) possess an unclassified FD-1023 form that describes an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions. It has been alleged that the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose.”

    The May 3 subpoena required the FBI to hand over any FD-1023 forms—which note information from confidential human sources—with the word “Biden” in them.

    The FBI refused to comply with the subpoena’s May 10 deadline.

    “It’s clear from the FBI’s response that the unclassified record the Oversight Committee subpoenaed exists, but they are refusing to provide it to the Committee. We’ve asked the FBI to not only provide this record, but to also inform us what it did to investigate these allegations,” said Comer in a May 10 statement. “The FBI has failed to do both. The FBI’s position is ‘trust, but you aren’t allowed to verify.’ That is unacceptable. We plan to follow up with the FBI and expect compliance with the subpoena.”

    “While the FBI has failed to produce the specific document by the subpoena deadline, their offer to provide an accommodation process in response to our legitimate request indicates the document is real,” said Grassley in a statement.

    “So the question remains, what did the FBI do to investigate very serious allegations from an apparent trusted FBI source implicating then-Vice President Biden? Today’s letter from the FBI raises additional questions, including whether the FBI has an open investigation based on these allegations. The American people pay the FBI’s salaries, and they’re entitled to a fulsome response.”

    A spokesperson said that FD-1023 forms are used by agents to record unverified information from confidential sources, and revealing such documents would jeopardize investigations.

    “Revealing unverified or possibly incomplete information could harm investigations, prejudice prosecutions or judicial proceedings, unfairly violate privacy or reputations, create misimpressions in the public, or potentially identify individuals who provide information to law enforcement, placing their physical safety at risk,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

    GOP Members React

    A handful of House GOP members told The Epoch Times on May 12 that they would be willing to hold Wray in contempt of Congress.

    Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) is one of those, having replied with a simple “yes.”

    “I think it’s unbelievable that the FBI is trying to refuse giving a nonclassified document to the Oversight Committee,” he said.

    Reps. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) and Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) said he “absolutely” would vote to hold Wray in contempt of Congress.

    “When you can’t tell me why that document can’t be exposed to people who are on [the House Intelligence Committee], why they have more of a right to intelligence than we do, the people who actually fund that department, when you can’t even do that in a secret capacity, then what are you hiding?” said McCormick.

    “If a credible allegation of bribery against a president can be made, that is an impeachable offense, and the full powers of Congress can be invoked not only to hold obstructionists accountable, but also to compel production of the evidence,” said McClintock.

    Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), citing that she’s not on the Oversight Committee, said she is “not up on that issue enough to answer the question.”

    When asked on May 12 if they would hold Wray in contempt, Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) answered in the affirmative.

    “If a whistleblower, as they have, has identified a form that the FBI has and then the FBI’s response, it seems like, they did not deny they didn’t have the form but they haven’t turned it over, the American public and Congress need to see this form,” said Lesko. “We need to find out if it implicates the president of the United States. And yes, we need to have action. We need to have teeth. If we issue a subpoena and they don’t answer, we need to follow it up.”

    Rep. Bill Johnson (R-Ohio) demurred.

    “I’m not going to get into the details of the FBI issue, but I will tell you that under the Constitution, we have a system of checks and balances,” he said. “And one of the most important authorities and responsibilities that we have as the voice of the American people is to hold the executive branch and the judicial branch accountable. And it’s a mutual system of checks and balances.”

    Last but not least, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) would not say, when asked by The Epoch Times on May 11, whether there would be a subpoena but did not rule it out.

    “There are checks and balances, and there is oversight. Congress has a right to have that knowledge,” he said. “And I will have a conversation with Director Wray about that and make sure that happens.”

    The Epoch Times reached out to McCarthy’s office to ask if the conversation with Wray happened.

    This article was updated to include a statement from the FBI. 

    via www.theepochtimes.com

    May 12, 2023 at 04:41PM

  • Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    https://ift.tt/q6gkXU5

    Reporting from the U.S.-Mexico border ahead of Title 42 ending Thursday night, Owen Shroyer filmed evidence of illegal immigrant pipelines at border wall gates.

    Owen also stumbled across a historic marker commemorating the Treaty of 1848 that ended the Mexican-American war and established a territorial border.

    He asked if Mexico or the U.S. broke the treaty as we’re currently witnessing millions of illegal immigrants flooding America.


    Because Infowars relies on YOUR SUPPORT in order to continue funding the operation, we urge you to visit the Infowars Store to do your part in the battle against globalism by purchasing great products such as dietary supplements, books, t-shirts, survival gear and much more. Thanks!


    via Infowars

    May 12, 2023 at 07:21AM

  • One dead, several wounded as Gaza rocket hits building in central Israel

    One dead, several wounded as Gaza rocket hits building in central Israel

    One dead, several wounded as Gaza rocket hits building in central Israel

    https://ift.tt/ly17o9j

    Haaretz Hebrew and TheMarker

    Haaretz.com, the online English edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, gives you breaking news, analyses and opinions about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.
    © Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved

    via Haaretz.com

    May 11, 2023 at 05:21PM

  • “Mercy Rule”: CNN Abruptly Cut Trump Town Hall Short by Twenty Minutes

    “Mercy Rule”: CNN Abruptly Cut Trump Town Hall Short by Twenty Minutes

    “Mercy Rule”: CNN Abruptly Cut Trump Town Hall Short by Twenty Minutes | The Gateway Pundit | by Kristinn Taylor

    CNN cut short the network’s town hall with President Trump Wednesday night by twenty minutes after Trump, backed by a wildly supportive audience (hand picked by CNN), took control of the forum from anchor Kaitlan Collins right from the start and never let up. The live event at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire was scheduled to run from 8 p.m. EDT until 9:30 p.m., however right before 9:10 p.m. Collins abruptly ended the town hall.


    President Trump smiles as he walks on stage at start of CNN town hall, screen image.

    An intro to a live thread by the Telegraph documented the scheduled length of the town hall:

    Good evening. Follow our updates as Donald Trump participates in a ‘town hall’ during which he will face questions from a live audience. The 90-minute event comes one day after a civil jury found the former US President liable for the sexual abuse of writer E Jean Carroll. Mr Trump reacted to that finding by posting on his Truth Social app that the case was a “witch hunt” and that he had “absolutely no idea who this woman is”. Expect further defensive comments when Mr Trump takes the stage in New Hampshire tonight. The event will be moderated by former chief White House correspondent and CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins.

    Puck’s Dylan Byers reported on CNN cutting the town hall short, “Note: The CNN Town Hall was a 90 minute broadcast, though the network expected the actual event to go as long as 75 minutes. They stopped less than 70 minutes in. In other words, they could have gone longer if they wanted—which is usually what executives do with big ratings draws”

    Exchanges like these were why CNN threw in the towel.

    Breitbart’s Joel Pollak observed the audience was laughing at Collins, “The @CNN audience is laughing at Kaitlin Collins because she keeps trying to squeeze Trump’s answers into her preconceived categories. It’s stupid and, yes, it is funny to laugh at her doing that.”

    Clip where audience laughs at Collins:

    Earlier Wednesday, Dylan Byers reported CNN was set to promote Collins to host of her own prime time show.

    Collins was so confident and loaded for bear at the outset.

    Last word to Steve Bannon, “First Time Ever ‘Mercy Rule’ Invoked…”

    via The Gateway Pundit

    May 11, 2023 at 07:08AM