PeterSantilli.com

Blog

  • Chimps In New Congress Want To Stop Criminals Who Stole The Election From Weaponizing Government

    Chimps In New Congress Want To Stop Criminals Who Stole The Election From Weaponizing Government

    January 9, 2022 at 08:22PM Communication, discussion and step-by-step outlining is a very time-consuming enterprise.  If you are wondering about the light CTH posting recently, refer to the prior sentence.  I cannot say much; except to say no one is more cynical than I, and yet there is reason to be cautiously optimistic.

    As previously noted, the 118th Congress is expected to authorize a “Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.”   The subcommittee will fall under the jurisdiction of the House Judiciary Committee led by Chairman Jim Jordan.   Additionally, Thomas Massie (R-KY) is being reported as a representative under consideration for the chairmanship the House subcommittee.

    House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan and potential House subcommittee Chair Thomas Massie should have a grasp of the scale and scope of the opposition they are about to face.  Assuming they have a fully prepared staff to support them – willing to take on a very consequential investigation; then we begin by first anticipating who will oppose their effort to investigate the “weaponization of government“.   Which is to say everyone!

    The defensive apparatus of the DC political system will likely do everything in their power, individually and with collective assistance, to ensure this committee fails.  The stakes are quite high.  As readers here can well attest, DC politics is an institutional system of purposefully created compartmentalized silos.

    The compartmented information silos permit plausible deniability, and this collection of weaponized institutions contains career bureaucrats who view their opposition as the American people.

    via The Last Refuge

  • Biden Threatens Conservatives at MLK Breakfast: “If You Want to Take on the Federal Government, You Need Some F-15s, You Don’t Need an AR-15”

    Biden Threatens Conservatives at MLK Breakfast: “If You Want to Take on the Federal Government, You Need Some F-15s, You Don’t Need an AR-15”

    Biden Threatens Conservatives at MLK Breakfast: “If You Want to Take on the Federal Government, You Need Some F-15s, You Don’t Need an AR-15” (VIDEO)

    Joe Biden on Monday delivered remarks at the National Action Network Martin Luther King, Jr. Day breakfast.

    Biden attacked police officers and targeted law-abiding gun owners in his speech.

    “We have to retrain cops. Why should you always shoot with deadly force? The fact is if you need to use your weapon, you don’t have to do that,” idiot Biden said.

    Police officers are trained to shoot center mass, but dummy Joe says cops should shoot violent suspects in the leg.

    Joe Biden then threatened millions of conservatives.

    “I love my right-wing friends talking about how the tree of liberty is watered with the blood of patriots. If you want to take on the federal government, you need some F-15s. You don’t need an AR-15,” Biden said.

    “I’m serious! Think about it!” he said.

    WATCH:

    This isn’t the first time Joe Biden has threatened millions of conservatives.

    In August Joe Biden went off-script and threatened “right-wing Americans” in a speech in Pennsylvania.

    “For those brave right-wing Americans… if you want to fight against the country, you need an F-15. You need something little more than a gun,” said Biden.

    “I’m not joking!” he added.

    Imagine the headlines if Trump said this about BLM.

    via The Gateway Pundit

    January 16, 2023 at 05:08PM

  • A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit

    A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit

    January 13, 2023 at 05:05PM. A Different Take on the Dismissal of the Trump v Clinton Lawsuit – The Last Refuge

    To accept a bigger picture is often to accept the foundation of what is present is not what it appears.

    Recently a Florida judge dismissed the lawsuit brought by President Trump against Hillary Clinton. [65-page Ruling Here]  The media have enjoyed ridiculing Trump by using the words of the judge who dismissed the case.  As noted by the Washington Times, “Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, a Clinton appointee, said Mr. Trump’s filing was too lengthy, detailing events that “are implausible because they lack any specific allegations which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached.”

    Pay attention to the framework underpinning Middlebooks’ opinion.  I have been reluctant to write about the decision to dismiss the lawsuit of President Trump against a multitude of conspirators, including Hillary Clinton, for two reasons.

    First, because when I originally read the 108-page lawsuit filed in March, it took me a few moments, and then I realized this was not a lawsuit; this was a legal transfer mechanism created by lawyers to establish a proprietary information silo.  Second, because I do not want another ridiculous subpoena from DC simply because they can’t fathom how any outside entity could solve a puzzle without insider assistance.  As to the former, I have prayed on it and come to the opinion it’s worth sharing. As to the latter, it’s just another waste of taxpayer funds, but whatever – the truth has no agenda.

    So, here’s a totally different take on the issues surrounding the Trump -v- Clinton lawsuit, which -from the outset- I always believed was going to be dismissed because suing all of those characters under the auspices of a civil RICO case was never the objective.  However, in the aftermath, the silo created by the lawsuit is also grounded upon attorney-client privilege, a legal countermeasure to a predictable DOJ-NSD lawfare maneuver, which unfolded in the Mar-a-Lago raid and ongoing issues.

    In March 2022 President Trump filed a civil lawsuit against: Hillary Clinton, Hillary for America Campaign Committee, DNC, DNC Services Corp, Perkins Coie, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Dolan, Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robby Mook, Phillipe Reines as well as Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Business Intelligence, Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Neustar Inc., Rodney Joffe, James Comey Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith and Andrew McCabe. [108-Page Lawsuit Here]

    When I was about one-third of the way through reading the lawsuit, I initially stopped and said to myself this is going to take a lot of documentary evidence to back up the claims in the assertions.  Dozens of attachments would be needed and hundreds of citations to the dozens of attachments would be mandatory.  Except, they were not there.

    After reading further, while completely understanding the background material that was being described in the filing, I realized this wasn’t a lawsuit per se’.  The 108-pages I was holding in my hands was more akin to legal transfer mechanism from President Trump to lawyers who needed it.  The filing was contingent upon a series of documents that would be needed to support the claims within it.

    Whoever wrote the lawsuit had obviously reviewed the evidence to support the filing.  However, the attachments and citations were missing. That was weird.  That’s when I realized the purpose of the lawsuit.  In hindsight, things became clear when the DOJ-NSD raided the home of Donald Trump, and suddenly the motive to confiscate the documents that would be the missing lawsuit attachments and citations surfaced.

    With the manipulative, and I say intentional, “ongoing investigation” angle of the John Durham probe essentially blocking public release of declassified documents showing the efforts of all the lawsuit participants (Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax), President Trump needed a legal way to secure and more importantly share the evidence.

    Think of it like the people around Trump wanting to show lawyers the evidence in the documents.  However, because of the construct of the lawfare being deployed against Trump, any lawyer would need a *reason* to review the evidence.   The Trump -v- Clinton et al lawsuit becomes that ‘reason.’

    The “documents” (classified or not) are reviewed by lawyers in preparation for the lawsuit.  This is their legal justification for reviewing the documents.  In essence, the lawsuit is a transfer mechanism permitting the Trump legal team to review the evidence on behalf of their client, former President Donald Trump.

    Once the formation of the lawsuit is established, the retainer and acceptance of the lawyers to represent their client cemented, the legal counsel, discussion and information within legal duties/obligations of those who represent the plaintiff (Trump) becomes an information silo.  In addition to previous executive privilege established by President Trump himself; outside government there is now another silo to defend against the motives of the Lawfare crew (DOJ), the attorney-client privilege.

    The lawsuit itself is the transfer mechanism permitting sharing of the documents and providing legal cover for the reviewers (lawyers).  The details within the 108-page filing constitute the claims of the plaintiff in the lawsuit, which were established by the evidentiary documents later seized by the DOJ and FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago.

    “Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, a Clinton appointee, said Mr. Trump’s filing was too lengthy, detailing events that “are implausible because they lack any specific allegations which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached.”

    There were no attachments and/or citations to the documentary evidence in the 108-page filing, because there was a legal risk to citing evidence with a status in dispute by the corrupt people in Main Justice and the FBI.  Secondarily, there was an obstruction risk to the President, if his legal team was to publish citations that were part of an ongoing investigation (Durham).   However, this doesn’t negate the value of constructing the information silo, an attorney-client privilege.

    If the documents seized by the FBI were part of the lawsuit established by President Trump and his legal team via Trump -v- Clinton, then the material seized is all attorney client work product.  Lawfully obtained, constitutionally declassified and legally protected material.

    This is where the ‘special master’ will play a key role.

    Keep watching.

    [Support CTH Here]

    via The Last Refuge

  • Lead Defense For Jan. 6 Political Prisoner Joe Biggs: Ashli Babbitt’s Murder Was A ‘Great Shot’ And He’s ‘Glad She Died’

    Lead Defense For Jan. 6 Political Prisoner Joe Biggs: Ashli Babbitt’s Murder Was A ‘Great Shot’ And He’s ‘Glad She Died’

    Lead Defense For Jan. 6 Political Prisoner Joe Biggs: Ashli Babbitt’s Murder Was A ‘Great Shot’ And He’s ‘Glad She Died’

    In audio obtained by The Gateway Pundit, the lead defense attorney in the J6 trial for two-time Purple Heart recipient Joe Biggs says Ashli Babbitt deserved to die and that protesters were white trash pieces of sh*t who were lucky they weren’t also shot.

    Greg Reese reports on this disturbing news:

    In order for Infowars to continue fighting back against the globalist takeover of America, we rely on YOUR SUPPORT as an independently funded business.

    Just head to the Infowars Store and purchase some of our great products such as dietary supplements, books, t-shirts, survival gear and more.

    via Infowars

    January 12, 2023 at 05:11PM

  • JUST IN: 210 Democrats Voted Against Providing Immediate Medical Assistance to Babies Who Survive Abortion

    JUST IN: 210 Democrats Voted Against Providing Immediate Medical Assistance to Babies Who Survive Abortion

    January 12, 2023 at 07:11AM JUST IN: 210 Democrats Voted Against Providing Immediate Medical Assistance to Babies Who Survive Abortion

    On Wednesday, 210 Democrat House representatives voted against providing medical assistance to babies who survive an abortion attempt.

    The House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act which stated that a baby born alive is a “legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States.” Doctors would be forced to give medical attention as a “reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive.”

    Check out what Fox News reported:

    The House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which says any infant born alive after an attempted abortion is a The bill passed 220-210, and all 210 of the “no” votes came from Democrats.

    Following that level of care, doctors would be required admit those infants to a hospital for further care. Any violation of this standard would result in fines and imprisonment for up to five years, or both.

    Republicans argued on the floor that comments from Virginia’s former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam are an example of why the law needs to be clarified to protect newborn infants who survive abortions. Northam was talking about third-trimester abortions and appeared to indicate support for delivering babies that might still be alive before taking their life outside the womb.

    “We all know in 2019, then-Gov. Northam of the state of Virginia stated this: ‘The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,’” said Republican Rep. Jim Jordan.

    “The cavalier attitude he displayed towards human life is just wrong,” Jordan said. “It is simple. Infants born alive following an abortion are kids, are children. All newborns deserve the same level of care.”

    Democrats’ arguments for why a live baby should not be cared for with immediate medical assistance was because the live baby, “may not be in the best interest of the family.”

    “We all know what this is about. It is not about the protection of newborn children. It’s about control,” said Democrat Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove. “It’s about the nation-wide abortion ban that Republicans have been itching to enact since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.”

    Democrat Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore. called the move to keep babies alive “extremist, dangerous and unnecessary.”

    Democrat Rep. Mary Scanlon said not letting babies die was a “grotesque attempt to politicize abortion care and criminalize doctors.”

    via Trending Politics Conservative News and Commentary

  • FBI reveals it uses CIA and NSA to spy on Americans

    FBI reveals it uses CIA and NSA to spy on Americans

    January 11, 2023 at 05:03PM FBI reveals it uses CIA and NSA to spy on Americans

    The FBI revealed how the bureau uses the CIA and National Security Agency to probe the private lives of Americans without a warrant in its updated rulebook, which is the first version made public since the Obama administration.

    The handbook, rewritten in 2021, confirms a decade-old leak showcasing the bureau’s collaboration with the CIA and NSA for FBI probes that may involve surveillance without court orders against people not accused of any crimes. Such probes are known as “assessments” at the FBI.

    The revelations will fuel critics who have long accused the FBI of abusing its national security surveillance powers.

    The FBI’s partnership with U.S. intelligence agencies that are focused on foreign threats is expected to get intense scrutiny from the new Republican-run Congress. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and House Judiciary Committee are digging into how intelligence agencies target Americans. Plans include a new panel to examine the weaponization of the federal government against U.S. citizens.

    New information about the FBI’s work with other federal agencies and state and local officials is included in the 906-page rule book authored during the Trump administration and revised under President Biden. The bureau published the updated Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide online after rejecting requests to make it public.

    The words CIA and NSA are unredacted in section 20.2 of the 2021 rule book, while the full details of the section remain hidden from public view. A leaked 2011 copy of the FBI’s rule book without redactions obtained by The Intercept shows that section 20.2 covers name trace requests, which involve formal FBI requests for other agencies to conduct searches of their records regarding subjects of interest.

     

    Information obtained by CIA and NSA searches of their records may be used in assessments and predicated investigations, according to the leaked 2011 rule book.

    The FBI assessments are investigations of people and groups that do not require accusations of wrongdoing and need only an “authorized purpose” and a clear objective, according to the 2021 rule book. The investigations are intended to prevent federal crimes, protect against threats to national security or collect foreign intelligence.

    Cato Institute senior fellow Patrick Eddington said the updated rule book shows that the FBI is confident that it will not face consequences for its conduct.

    “The bureau is continuing to hide the fact that 1) they can and clearly do use informants to penetrate domestic civil society organizations where those informants may, either on their own or at FBI direction, attempt to influence the organization’s actions,” Mr. Eddington said in an email. “And 2) [they] employ searches of CIA and NSA data streams on U.S. persons or civil society organizations absent a criminal predicate via assessments.”

    Mr. Eddington said both practices should be prohibited by law and Congress will have a chance to do that this year.

    The NSA declined to comment and referred questions to the FBI, which also refused to comment.

    The CIA said it follows the rules and respects Americans’ privacy.

    “CIA recognizes and takes very seriously our obligation to respect the privacy and civil liberties of U.S. persons in the conduct of our vital national security mission, and conducts our activities in compliance with U.S. law, Executive Order 12333, and our Attorney General guidelines,” the CIA said in a statement to The Times.

    Assessments have faced bipartisan scrutiny in recent years, and the bureau’s internal audits dating to 2013 have shown agents’ repeated failures to follow rules for sensitive investigations.

    The FBI’s use of assessments contributed to worries that agents are investigating Americans because of their ideologies, politics or religious beliefs. The conservative Concerned Women for America, a New York chapter of the League of Women Voters, and the Muslim Justice League in Massachusetts are among the groups swept up in FBI assessments, according to records obtained by Mr. Eddington.

    The FBI revealed in 2021 that there was nothing to pursue at Concerned Women for America after conducting an assessment in 2016. In December 2021, the bureau told Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, that it did not need to explain its probe of the group.

    The FBI’s use of assessments drew additional congressional attention from the House last year. Reps. Nancy Mace, South Carolina Republican, and Jamie Raskin, Maryland Democrat, pressed the Government Accountability Office to conduct a comprehensive review of the bureau’s assessments.

    The bipartisan duo said the FBI may have wrongly used assessments to conduct investigations without factual predicates of criminal wrongdoing. They wanted to know whether the assessments involved the monitoring of constitutionally protected activity.

    The bureau’s decision to unveil aspects of its work with the CIA and NSA in its 2021 rule book indicates that it has teamed with those intelligence agencies on assessments for more than 10 years.

    The Cato Institute sued the FBI for access to government records and pressed the bureau to reveal its rule book before the FBI published it online this fall. Mr. Eddington said his team plans to file challenges to the information that the FBI is keeping hidden in its updated rule book.

    via The Washington Times

  • HUGE: Matt Gaetz Reveals Republicans Will Release the 14,000 Hours of J6 Tapes That Have Been Hidden

    HUGE: Matt Gaetz Reveals Republicans Will Release the 14,000 Hours of J6 Tapes That Have Been Hidden

    January 10, 2023 at 05:31PM HUGE: Matt Gaetz Reveals Republicans Will Release the 14,000 Hours of J6 Tapes That Have Been Hidden (VIDEO)

    Looks like we will finally get the full story on what really happened on January 6th. Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) told Charlie Kirk today on Kirk’s radio show that the new Republican Congress will unveil the hidden J6 tapes.

    Gaetz told Charlie Kirk that releasing the tapes “would give more full context to that day rather than the cherry-picked moments of the January 6th committee.”  He further explained this is one example of the deal made with Kevin McCarthy to provide the American people the truth rather than the lies propagated by the Biden Regime.

    Here is the relevant part of their conversation:

    Kirk: One of my favorite members of Congress is Thomas Massie and the fact that he is going to be on this new committee (the Church Committee) really gives me hope.

    Matt, do you anticipate allowing the dogs to be released if you will against this fourth branch of government (the Deep State).

    Gaetz: Kevin McCarthy told us he is going to get the evidence out in front of the American people and that means releasing the 14,000 hours of tapes that have been hidden that I think would give more full context to that day (January 6th) rather than the cherry-picked moments the January 6th committee tried to use to inflame and further divide out country.

    So yes, I do believe that part of this deal is a concession that we are going to get the truth out in front of the American people.

    Should Congress actually follow through and release the tapes, this will serve as the first step toward getting justice for the January 6th prisoners. The Gateway Pundit has provided numerous accounts of the horrifying conditions the Regime has placed them in.

    TGP owner Jim Hoft has been particularly outspoken over the treatment of the Regime’s political prisoners and has attended protests speaking on their behalf. TGP writer Cara Castronuova has also broken numerous critical stories on the prisoners’ suffering.

    The deal made between McCarthy and the conservative rebels continues to look better as the days go by. We have patriots like Matt Gaetz to thank for this.

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • TEXT TOTC

    sdf

  • FEC Commissioner Trainor Sent Three Emails Regarding Millions in Dem Election Crimes and Still No Response

    FEC Commissioner Trainor Sent Three Emails Regarding Millions in Dem Election Crimes and Still No Response

    January 10, 2023 at 07:13AM EXCLUSIVE: FEC Commissioner Trainor Sent Three Emails Regarding Millions in Dem Election Crimes and Still No Response

    The corrupt and criminal Democrat machine committed millions of dollars in fraudulent campaign finance activities that have been identified and provided to the Head of the FEC.  To date, these communications have been ignored. 

    It turns out that millions in donations in the 2022 election were sent to candidates like Raphael Warnock from “money mules” around the country.  Warnock was the top beneficiary of all 2022 Democrat candidates identified in this money distribution scheme. 

    In April 2022, engineer Chris Gleason began working on his first data project involving elections.  The project was tied to the 2022 midterm election.  This was unique for Chris because he had been involved in tech and data for the majority of his adult career although he never used his expertise on a political project.

    What he and a small group of others identified were money mules.

    These “Money Mules” were not wealthy individuals. They also were not employed.  These mules donated millions and millions of dollars to national and statewide races.  

    We documented these findings in the article below.  To date, this has fallen on deaf ears.

    Next, Chris Gleason looked at “campaign finance mules” in Missouri after The Gateway Pundit spoke with Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft who asked us about the number of campaign mules in Missouri.  

    Chris was taken aback by what he discovered. Chris uncovered the most prolific campaign finance mule he has yet exposed.

    According to Chris, “Steven in Missouri” made 14,111 political donations totaling over $180,000 in the last two years. 

    And Steven is UNEMPLOYED.  Steven from Missouri donated on average 19 times a day to various campaigns.

    “Campaign Finance Mules” Part 2: UNEMPLOYED Missouri Donors Exposed Who Made Thousands of Donations Totaling Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars

    Gleason recently shared this information with the current Head of the FEC, the government organization that was created to promote confidence and participation in the democratic process.

    FEC Commissioner James E. “Trey” Trainor III was nominated by President Donald J. Trump and confirmed by the United States Senate on May 19, 2020. He was appointed to a term ending April 30, 2023.

    To date, there has been no reply!

    To top it off, the majority of these findings were identified from government data.

    Gleason asks what activities government bodies and law enforcement are taking to identify election fraud.

    This is the largest election fraud enterprise ever identified and no government agency has yet to lift a finger and do something. 

    This is a travesty.  Please let your representative and state officials know about these criminal activities going on in your state. 

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • US Supreme Court IS OFFICIALLY CAPTURED

    US Supreme Court IS OFFICIALLY CAPTURED

    January 9, 2023 at 05:08PM US Supreme Court Also Decides NOT to Look at Bonner Case on Legality of Mail-in Ballots

    The US Supreme Court not only decided not to look at the Brunson brothers’ case, but also decided not to take up the Bonner case challenging the legality of mail-in ballots. 

    Such a shame.  The US Supreme Court is absolutely frightened to take up strong cases that challenge corrupt elections or corrupt practices.  Yet this is the biggest issue facing our country right now and the biggest threat to our Constitution.

    Corrupt elections breed corrupt politicians which bread corrupt government officials which breed corrupt media and social media companies and so on…

    In 2020, 18 state AGs joined the Texas case that argued against the corrupt election results that were certified in the swing states that stole the election for Joe Biden.  It was a solid case.  This corruption affected us all and still does to this day.  We all were impacted.  But the three Trump judges decided not to hear the case along with the corrupt Obama, far-left and insane judges on the court.  INSANITY.

    TRENDING: Bolsonaro Condemns Vandalism, 5 Shot and 1200 Arrested as Protesters Disarm Provocateurs and Hand Them Over to Police

    These Three Trump Judges Threw the President Under the Bus and the Texas Case in The Garbage

    The Supreme Court also refused to hear the cases from the Trump campaign against the states where material amounts of corruption existed.

    This morning we heard that the Brunson brothers’ case was not going to move forward in the Supreme Court.

    BREAKING: Brunson Brothers Case Denied by Supreme Court

    The other material election case that the Supreme Court refused to take up was the Bonner case.  This case challenged the legality of mail-in ballots.  The Court didn’t want to take this up either.

    Here is a list of cases that the Supreme Court looked into and their resolution for each.

    Supreme Court Decisions on Cases Bonner and Brunson010923zor_p860 by Jim Hoft on Scribd

    via The Gateway Pundit