by Pete Santilli, Host of The Pete Santilli Show

In 2012 / 2014, I was an independent media talk show host saying the same exact things back then about  “communists” in the Obama/Biden Administration that I’m saying today about the Biden/Obama regime.

Since then, I’ve researched, documented, and catalogued whistleblower testimony which clearly indicates that the Central Intelligence Agency and their domestic sister agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, have overthrown our Constitutional Republic.  Everything we think we know about the world we live in is based on lies propagated by the main stream media, which is nothing more than an operational division of the intelligence services.

Between 2012 and January 2016, I’m proud to say that I did everything in my then limited powers to bring the deep state to it’s knees, and they came after me with a vengeance.   For exposing the corruption at the FBI, CIA, and other federal law enforcement agencies, as well as relentlessly covering many “false flag” operations such as 9-11, the Boston Marathon Bombing, and Benghazi; The deep state retaliated by using the full force of the U.S. government to stop me from reaching millions of people with the truth.

On January 26, 2016, I was arrested in Oregon by the Federal Bureau of Investigations after then Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on my arrest warrant.  The FBI fabricated a fraudulent 302 investigative report which contained false witness testimony, and after 7 months of torturous solitary confinement my case was dismissed on the eve of trial.  When our legal team uncovered the corrupt methods employed by the FBI in obtaining my indictment, prosecutors offered me a misdemeanor which I immediately turned down. I told them, “I wouldn’t even take a parking ticket for what you’ve done…I will see you at trial”.  On the day before trial, the prosecutors dismissed my case.

In September 2016 after my dismissal in the Oregon United States vs Ammon Bundy,  I was immediately transferred  to await the next trial for my indictment in Nevada (United States vs Cliven Bundy).  I was facing four life sentences if convicted.  Four life sentences —  for broadcasting law enforcement abuse of unarmed protestors.

Let’s pause for a minute and step away from the minutia of my federal cases.  I was indicted for being a reporter at Bundy Ranch in 2014 and Oregon in 2016.  Along with 25 others and accused of crimes that I did not commit. The U.S. Government piled on so many charges that if convicted, I would never see the light of day as a free man.  Headlines and mainstream commentary about our arrests were exactly the same as they use today when reporting on the January 6th protests at the Capitol in Washington D.C.  We were, according to the media,  insurrectionists, seditionists, white supremacists, a “danger to society”, while the main stream media simply regurgitated the government-fed narrative via the U.S. Government’s most powerful blog — the court docket.

By the grace of God, and with the truth on our side, my fellow defendants and I stood our ground, refused to cave under the pressure of the full weight of the U.S. Government by insisting on going to trial.  Ultimately, we won dismissals and acquittals in Oregon, and exposed so much corruption & prosecutorial misconduct that a leftist Federal Judge was forced to dismiss the Nevada case.  Although I would never wish it upon any other American, 619 days of incarceration was a blessing in disguise because I am one of the very few Americans  able to see first hand the deep corruption and immorality of those we’ve entrusted with power.

After January 6th 2021, I now watch the same corrupt prosecutors at the DOJ, and law enforcement at the FBI in action once again.  Although Trump is out and Biden is in, not much has changed at the FBI & DOJ.  Same criminal intent and same old criminal methodology in pursuing their political opponents.  First they “investigate” potential violence in advance of an event, in this instance the January 6th rally, by employing thousands of online covert investigators publishing inflammatory, anonymous social media posts, then activate FBI informants with criminal backgrounds who provoke violence & engage in unlawful conduct with envelops of untraceable cash.   The FBI then activates the main stream media to demonize their target & glorify their self important & so-called “investigation”.

The violence & unlawful activity on January 6th was not incited by President Trump, nor was it intended by over a million Patriots who travelled to DC.  The violence was manufactured by the FBI.  The entire “investigation” after January 6th is a pre-planned step in a very sophisticated entrapment scheme.

Essentially, well before January 6th, the FBI and DOJ had already “reverse engineered” indictments.  They all knew well in advance that their political adversaries — Trump supporters — were traveling to DC to lawfully and peacefully redress grievance against their government and all they had to do was craft or manufacture a scenario whereby hundreds or even thousands of citizens would be charged with conspiracy & sedition.   The DOJ and FBI know they can get away with using informants, provocateurs, as well as other sources & methods which will never be discovered in open court because most Americans will never go to trial.  The law requires the prosecution to provide any exculpatory information to the defendant, as well as any information provided by informants.   Because 97 percent of Americans never take their cases to trial, the FBI and DOJ get way with hiding details of their corrupt methods & misconduct.  Sadly, in most cases that do go to trial they will continue to hide evidence and never get caught because lawyers who get assigned to these defendants could care less about their clients.

In the Oregon and Nevada cases, all defendants refused to plead out & demanded a trial.  We were all aware that the DOJ and FBI pile on charges, unconstitutionally detain their targets pre-trial for months (sometimes years), threaten defendants with decades of incarceration, and then “negotiate” a plea bargain.  This is all designed to guarantee a punishment of their target, but most importantly, cover-up U.S Government misconduct by preventing cases from going to trial.

With a 97% success rate in “winning” federal cases by these methods, in most criminal cases all the U.S. Attorneys care about is winning. In political prosecutions, the DOJ spares no expense in prosecuting their opponents.  In the Oregon and Nevada cases the U.S. Government spent upwards of $100 million dollars to prosecute.  If each of us were to hire private attorneys, it would have cost each of us upwards of $1.5 million to take our cases to trial.  The Criminal Justice Act provides federal court-appointed attorneys who have almost no trial experience.  Essentially, the CJA attorneys are paid by the U.S. Government to negotiate plea agreements by scaring their clients with the alternative — decades in prison.

It’s reported that there are an estimated 900 American Patriots who have been arrested, held without bail, and over-charged in their indictments concerning the January 6th protest in DC.  Simply put, most of those 900 are innocent of the crimes they have been over-charged with, and at the very least  may have committed  much less serious crimes of trespassing or interference on January 6th.

Right now these American Patriots as well as many other potential victims of prosecutorial misconduct are in very serious, grave danger.  They are being isolated from the public, cut off completely from the internet, and their attorneys are paid government employees.  If they are not given adequate legal counsel, they will unintentionally destroy their lives.  They’re under extreme duress, and it is imperative that their attorneys be well informed of what the DOJ and FBI will do to prosecute political adversaries.

Please help me get the word out to every American Patriot who has been indicted by this awful regime.   I’m very confident that I can break through to their attorneys with valuable legal strategies that will set each of them free — even if they committed lessor crimes.  Once the court discovers their misconduct, judges are forced to punish the prosecution and law enforcement for egregious misconduct.  Based on everything I’ve seen in the media, read in the indictments, and heard from the FBI, these are the same sleazy characters who pursued the Bundy defendants. Same methods.  Same tactics.  Same egregious misconduct, and ultimately, the truth will set each of them free if we are able to get the word out to their attorneys quickly.

I’m probably one of the most qualified, experienced and successful subject matter experts on political prosecutions and government misconduct.  When attorneys learn that I have two federal trials in the win column, almost all of them admit that they’ve never won 2 federal trials in their entire careers.  We’ve successfully defeated the deep state in 2 federal cases, had experienced U.S. Attorneys admonished for misconduct & removed from cases, and had countless federal law enforcement agents stripped of their guns & badges and walked out the door.

It’s urgent that we do the same for our fellow American Patriots.  Help me go around the corrupt main stream media to reach as many defendants as we possibly can. The word will spread like wildfire throughout the legal community.  Protestors who have been arrested and charged may be forced to plead to a lessor crime, and some may be dismissed.  Either way, a cover-up of the DOJ’s & FBI’s methods and sources for bringing such indictments is well underway.

I’m living proof that the real criminals are the one’s with badges, guns in federal law enforcement and law licenses at the U.S. Attorney’s Offices.

Since December 2011, Pete Santilli has been the Host of The Pete Santilli Show, a news commentary and analysis program which broadcasts live twice daily at 9am and 6pm EST.  (See links here). The Pete Santilli Show offers a daily dose of hard-hitting stories and current affairs, laced with brutal honesty. It attracts millions of listeners worldwide. Though an impressive feat, it’s not surprising: Santilli, together with his co-host, Deb Jordan, offer a no-holds-barred approach to political news, bringing a refreshingly edgy and powerful flavor to the table. The show has covered (arguably) some of the most controversial topics ever known—nothing is off limits.

Media & Attorney Requests: To book interviews or appointments with Pete Santilli, please contact James Lopez at Epic Quest Media (773) 733-9700

BREAKING UPDATE: JUDGE REVERSES ORDER TO PRESERVE FORENSIC EVIDENCE

BREAKING UPDATE: Judge Timothy Batten Issues Order to Freeze All Dominion Machines in Georgia! (GA LAWSUIT, TRO & EXHIBITS ATTACHED)

UPDATE: JUDGE ORDERS GEORGIA TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE & PROHIBIT DELETION OF DATA!

GEORGIA “TRO” (WITH EXHIBITS) DEMANDING SEIZURE OF VOTING MACHINES

GEORGIA LAWSUIT

GEORGIA LAWSUIT EXHIBITS

Sidney Powell’s Georgia Emergency Declaratory Judgment Demands Seizure of Every Voting Machine in State

Check out this post from The Gateway Pundit

Check out this post from The Federalist

 

 

 

 

 

UPDATE:  The Georgia Complaint is not yet listed in PACER with attached exhibits.  Below please find the Michigan complaint and exhibits.

MICHIGAN COMPLAINT

MICHIGAN EXHIBITS

BREAKING: KRAKEN RELEASED! Attorney Sidney Powell Files 104 Page BOMBSHELL COMPLAINT of Massive Fraud in Georgia Election – Update: Michigan too

Check out this post from The Gateway Pundit

 

OPINION

by Peter Santilli, Commentator & Investigative Journalist

On October 15, 2020, almost a billion people — including myself — were silently and abruptly disconnected from their trusted independent media sources by Google and Youtube.

It is estimated that the world’s top 50+ independent researchers who published their investigative content on Youtube had their accounts terminated, and their entire library of evidence was deleted from public view.

On October 26th, a group of researchers filed an emergency injunction to have their Youtube accounts reinstated, and a northern California federal district court ordered Google to respond to the emergency request no later than Friday October 30, 2020.

Quite frankly, their response was shocking, yet very revealing.

Please allow me to begin describing the significance of these legal proceedings by reminding everyone what we’ve been experiencing over the past several weeks with the main stream media’s cover-up of “Hunter Biden’s Laptop From Hell”.  I can go even further by reminding everyone that we have yet to see results of the FBI’s investigation of Anthony Weiner’s laptop, which was recovered by NYPD in 2016.

On Friday October 30th, Google’s attorney’s filed an “OPPOSITION” to the researchers’ request for re-instatement of their body of work (criminal investigations).  In my professional & well-informed opinion, the most accurate way to describe Google’s/Youtube’s response is that is was nothing less than an open admission that Youtube is a willing and complicit participant  in a conspiracy to cover-up very serious crimes against humanity.

As we’ve seen with Hunter Biden’s laptop, government actors such as Congressman Adam Schiff immediately jumped out in front of the story by floating the unsubstantiated theory that it’s all a “Russian disinformation campaign”.  His fellow criminal operatives in the intelligence community pile-on by publicly proclaiming that “all indications are that it is Russian disinformation”.

Their coup-plotting co-conspirators in the main stream media immediately broadcast Schiff and intelligence official’s lies on network television and cable news, and social media companies activate their mass censorship technology to stop any truthful information from spreading like wildfire.  It has been confirmed by the Department of Justice that information on Hunter Biden’s laptop is being investigated for potential money laundering and other possible crimes.

Let that sink in.  Elected officials, main stream media reporters, and big tech companies have all been working in concert to cover up information about an investigation and alleged crimes perpetrated against the United States of America.   In legal terminology, they call that a “conspiracy”.  In Big Tech terminology, censorship is justified all under the guise of protecting the community from “dangerous conspiracy theories linked to real-world violence”.

Google/Youtube’s most recent legal filing is significant, as it reveals details of a very complex decision making process in their participation as a co-conspirator to suppress evidence of crimes being perpetrated upon the American people.

The Plaintiffs are not a small group of “gamers” who are playing violent computer games whose conduct on Youtube could inspire mass murderers to act out their computer war simulations. These Youtubers are researchers whose entire body of work connects the dots with evidence of potential crimes against humanity.  As we are all very well aware, some of the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity reside in the halls of Silicon Valley corporations such as Facebook, Youtube and Twitter. This not a conspiracy theory that can easily be dismissed by deleting Youtube videos.

In the past several years, we’ve discovered indisputable facts through trials and legal proceedings (i.e. Epstein, NXVIUM, Spygate, RussiaGate, Ukraine Gate, etc, etc, etc.) that politicians, corporate executives, and corrupt law enforcement officials have been involved in crimes such as treason & sedition against the United States government, money laundering, sex trafficking, child exploitation, drug trafficking, and human rights abuses.  Independent researchers such as the Plaintiffs have been informing the public of their findings, and Google/Youtube has now admitted to stopping them on a massive scale.

Over the past 10 years I’ve relied upon many independent researchers such as SGT Report, Amazing Polly, Jordan Sather,  etc. to supplement my own independent research and investigations, and over the past 10 years I’ve personally witnessed and experienced Youtube’s very sophisticated means of suppressing information which has exposed criminal conspiracies which have resulted in mass death and physical/economic destruction around the world.  In every instance, Google/Youtube has justified censorship of my criminal investigations under the guise of “protecting the community”, or stopping the spread of “hate speech” that could inspire extremists to act.

Just to give you an idea of the work I’ve performed as an independent investigator, please allow me to name just a couple stories that Google/Youtube has wiped off the internet for the purposes of “protecting the community”.(We’ve had over 150,000 channel subscribers & 60 million+ viewers deleted) :

1. UKRAINE –  In 2012-2014, our team cataloged evidence of a CIA overthrow of the Ukraine government, mercenary snipers firing at both police and protestors in Kiev, as well money laundering and corruption that we are still learning about to this day.
2. 9-11 –  Since 2012, we’ve interviewed scientists and federal law enforcement who’ve exposed a massive criminal cover-up of the attack on the US on 9-11.  Additionally, we broadcast documentation from FOIA requests detailing the FBI’s evacuation of the Bin Laden family on 9-11, along with several individuals who were on the terror watch list.
3. BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING: On the night that the Boston Marathon Bombing suspects were pursued by law enforcement, during a live broadcast of events, we recorded live radio transmissions of police identifying the fugitives as “Mike Mulageta and Sunil Trupathi”.  Officers transmitted the information to their dispatch operators, reading directly from the driver’s licenses of the subjects.  2 hours later, the Associated Press announced that the fugitives were identified as the “Zarnaev brothers”; (associated with Chechnian Rebels).
4. BUNDY RANCH (2014) / MALHEUR NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE PROTEST (2016) –  In a multi-year investigation of corrupt law enforcement officials within the Department of Interior / Bureau of Land Management who, by the way, have all been removed from their federal law enforcement duties/jobs, I was involved in defeating the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice prosecutors in 2 federal trials in Oregon and Nevada. U.S. Attorneys and FBI officials were found by Federal Judges to have committed prosecutorial misconduct and suppression fo exculpatory evidence.   In 2020, a liberal 9th Circuit panel deemed the indictment of the defendants to be a complete fraud.

These are merely four of some of the most important stories of our lifetime that I’ve covered.  Over the past 10 years, I have not only personally witnessed Google/Youtube suppress information, but in the 2 federal cases we won in Oregon and Nevada, we learned in open court that Big Tech corporations such as Google/Youtube, Facebook and Twitter are acting in concert with corrupt & criminal operators within the federal government.  Essentially, I have legal documentation that they’re acting at the behest of corrupt government officials in order to cover-up evidence of their crimes.

The “community” they purport to be protecting is literally intentionally being harmed by Google/Youtube’s censorship.  For instance, in January 2016 I reported that the Clinton Foundation had received $140 million from Russian individuals from Uranium One. I was the second journalist to report on Hillary Clinton’s connection to Uranium One.  Of course the FBI, main stream media and Youtube all called me a “conspiracy theorist”, and all of my listeners “extremists”, “white nationalists” and was officially designated by the Obama Administration as an anti-government domestic terrorist.  Youtube deleted my entire channel for “bullying” & “hate speech”, and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on my arrest warrant after the FBI manufactured a fake 302 report.

As a corporation, does Youtube have the right to remove content at their discretion? Sure, but do they have the right to blatantly conceal their direct involvement as a co-conspirator and government actor covering up independent criminal investigations?

If they were running a privately owned restaurant, do they have the right to post a sign telling their customers they can refuse service to anyone without a shirt or shoes — yes — but is the restaurant immune from accountability for assassinating customers who discover the FBI/CIA is running a casino in the back room, or the ATF is dealing illegal drugs over the counter, or better yet, politicians are using the restaurant as a store front to conceal a sex-trafficking operation —- all under the guise of “protecting their customers”?

If you decide to read Google/Youtube’s OPPOSITION filing, ask yourself the following:

• They cite the FBI as a source of information on domestic terrorism and extremism inspired by the QAnon or Pizzagate community.  Do you trust the integrity of the FBI, the corrupt Deep State agency lead by Christopher Wray which (a) called for the deletion of the Weiner laptop and secretly held onto the Hunter Biden laptop since 2018?
• Youtube references news articles as sources of information of extremism and hate groups.   Do you trust left wing main stream media designations of hate groups, extremists or conspiracy theorists?
• Do you trust that Google/Youtube is deleting Youtube channels to “protect the community”, or do you believe they’re operating in concert with, and at the behest of corrupt, Deep State government actors who are being exposed by trusted independent investigators such as SGT Report, Amazing Polly, etc.?
• Even if you believe that businesses have a right to operate their businesses as they see fit, does that mean they have a right to assist in covering up crimes?
• If independent investigators who publish their work on Youtube can be shut down because they’re covering stories that inspire extremists to act violently, shouldn’t the rules apply equally to Black Lives Matters “mostly peaceful protestors” who inspire others to loot, burn down buildings and kill police officers?

October 15th will be an important date to remember.  This was the day that Google/Youtube made the fatal error of officially putting their name on the list of Deep State criminal conspirators who are perpetrating crimes against humanity.

The Plaintiffs in this lawsuit are Patriots. They’re investigators with Godly intentions.  They’re people who are doing their best to expose crimes being perpetrated upon humanity. Google/Youtube is not only intentionally trying to stop them from exposing crimes, they’re acting as criminal co-conspirators  of the Deep State.

Who is more protective of the “community”, the Plaintiffs (Youtubers) or the Defendants (Google/YouTube)?   Regardless of who wins the lawsuit, this case will certainly be tried in the court of public opinion.

Read More About The Lawsuit – CLICK HERE

 

OPPOSITION TO TRO 21-main by Pete Santilli on Scribd

by Deb Jordan

Emergency Filing Alleges That Youtube Acted At The Behest & Encouragement Of The U.S. House Of Representatives. (To Deplatform Content Producers)

Fifteen popular YouTube content creators filed a federal lawsuit today against Google and YouTube, alleging that Google and YouTube have breached the Terms of Service those creators had agreed to when they signed on and violated their First Amendment rights. What started as rumor of a ‘coming widespread purge” of conservative content producers right before midterm elections in 2018, quickly turned into reality as just weeks before votes were to be cast FaceBook disabled 559 pages and 251 accounts.  YouTube and Twitter were matching FaceBook’s censorship during that time with the beginning of what we have seen come to pass in the last few weeks.

According to the press release the Plaintiffs are these popular creators of YouTube channels, with collectively lay claim to over 800 million views: JustInformed Talk, SGT Report, X22 Report, SpaceShot 76, TruReporting, RedPill78, Edge of Wonder, Praying Medic, Amazing Polly, Woke Societies, Daniel Lee, Deception Byes, InTheMatrixxx, Destroying the Illusion, and Sarah Westall.

The Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys M. Cris Armenta and Credence Sol.  Both are former federal law clerks; Ms. Armenta in the Central District of California, and Ms. Sol in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ms. Armenta has been named one of the top 100 female attorneys in California and is on the peer‐reviewed SuperLawyers list for civil litigation who fully expect YouTube and Google defend the case and claim that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides them immunity for the actions taken against conservative YouTube commentators and content creators.

The lawsuit also alleges that YouTube acted at the behest, was encouraged by and coerced by Congress, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Representative Adam Schiff  who published a complaint on Congressional letterhead that urged content be removed and replaced. The press release goes further to explain: The Plaintiffs allege that under Supreme Court precedent, if a private party acts when it is encouraged or coerced by the government or its agents, then the state action theory applies and the First Amendment rights should be protected, particularly from viewpoint discrimination. Since Adam Schiff, a sitting representative, personally and publicly in his official capacity asked for social media platforms to begin censoring conservative content providers and YouTube thereafter responded and complied to that request, the door was opened for this lawsuit.

The Plaintiffs expect that they will either receive or be denied an emergency injunction, or a restraining order upon Youtube, requiring that their accounts be reinstated.  If the lawsuit proceeds as expected, it is anticipated that the legal issues raised in the complaint may finally settle the issues relating to Big Tech’s immunity from lawsuits under the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The implications are immense, and the public deserves to be well informed on the progress of this landmark case.

We will continue to provide updates as litigation proceeds.

Youtube Complaint by Pete Santilli on Scribd

 

---

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA – On October 26, 2020, fifteen YouTube content creators filed a federal
lawsuit against Google and YouTube, alleging in seventeen claims for relief, that Google and YouTube
breached the Terms of Service and violated their First Amendment rights, when they summarily deplatformed
the Plaintiffs’ channels and removed their content from YouTube without advance notice.

The Plaintiffs are the creators of YouTube channels, including: JustInformed Talk, SGT Report,
X22 Report, SpaceShot 76, TruReporting, RedPill78, Edge of Wonder, Praying Medic, Amazing Polly,
Woke Societies, Daniel Lee, Deception Byes, InTheMatrixxx, Destroying the Illusion and Sarah Westall.
Together, their news and social commentary channels have reached more than 800 million views and
together they had more YouTube subscribers than many legacy news channels, such as C‐SPAN, The
New York Times, and NBC News. Plaintiffs cite a recent study by the Pew Research Center that concludes
that many Americans get their news from independent YouTube channels along the same metrics as
legacy or traditional news sources.

YouTube and Google are expected to defend the case and claim that Section 230 of the
Communications Decency Act provides them immunity for the actions they took against conservative
commentators, just 19 days before the November 3 Presidential Election. However, the Ninth Circuit
has recently issued an opinion, retreating from the broad interpretation of the immunity that social
media has used for years to defend lawsuits from its contract partners and users. The Section 230
immunities were provided by Congress as a means to give internet providers an ability to remove
content that was considered “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or
otherwise objectionable.” Enigma Software Group USA LLC. V. Malwarebytes, Inc., No. 17‐17351
(Opinion filed September 12, 2019). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found persuasive the notion
that the “unbounded reading” of Section 230 previously employed by social media giants such as
YouTube would allow a content provider to “block content for anticompetitive purposes or merely at its
malicious whim.”

The Plaintiffs allege that YouTube removed their channels without giving them notice or without
cause under the Terms of Service that YouTube itself drafted and imposed on the Plaintiffs. The
Plaintiffs allege that YouTube also violated the First Amendment rights of the Plaintiffs, and the public
they serve through their social commentary, news and information channels. Although many courts
have rejected the notion that YouTube is subject to the First Amendment, concluding that YouTube is a
private party, the Complaint alleges that YouTube acted at the behest, was encouraged by and coerced
by Congress, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Representative Adam Schiff. The Plaintiffs attach
to the Complaint letters that Representative Schiff published on Congressional letterhead that urged
that content be removed and replaced. The Plaintiffs also reference the House’s recent action by the
House, in passing House Resolution 1154, which condemned certain content and specifically mentioned
social media. In direct response to Representative Schiff’s published letter demanding censorship,
YouTube Chief Executive Officer Susan Wojcicki responded by Tweet: “Thanks for reaching out, we’re
working every day to protect people from misinformation and help them find authoritative information.
We appreciate your partnership and will continue to consult with Members of Congress as we address
ARMENTA & SOL PC, 114400 WEST BERNARDO COURT, SUITE 300, SAN DIEGO, CA 92127
the evolving issues around #COVID19.” The Plaintiffs allege that under Supreme Court precedent, if a
private party acts when it is encouraged or coerced by the government or its agents, then the state
action theory applies and the First Amendment rights should be protected, particularly from viewpoint
discrimination.

This lawsuit follows the filing of a massive antitrust action against Google by the Department of
Justice and eleven states.

The “state action” theory was previously raised in by Armenta & Sol, on behalf of an African‐
American conservative commentator, Young Pharaoh, in July 2020 also against Google and YouTube.
Although the Defendants in that case filed a Motion to Dismiss and oral argument was held, Magistrate
Judge Virginia DeMarchi has not yet issued a decision.

The lawsuit will be served on Google and YouTube today.
* * *
The Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys M. Cris Armenta and Credence Sol. Both were
previously affiliated with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP. Both are former federal law clerks;
Ms. Armenta in the Central District of California, and Ms. Sol in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ms.
Armenta has been named one of the top 100 female attorneys in California and is on the peer‐reviewed
SuperLawyers list for civil litigation. Ms. Armenta is a former member of the Board of Directors of the
American Civil Liberties Union in Los Angeles. Ms. Armenta’s law practice focuses on civil litigation,
entertainment, real estate, and the recovery of abducted children. Ms. Sol’s practice focuses on civil
litigation and intellectual property, in which she has a Ph.D; she has published several articles on
Internet law and international freedom of speech issues. Both Ms. Armenta and Ms. Sol have previously
litigated against Google.

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE LAWSUIT:

---

 

Via:  PUNCHGOOGLE.COM

Hi, my name is Zach Vorhies and I’m known as the Google Whistleblower. I’m working with Ryan Hartwig, Facebook Whistleblower on this campaign.

I worked at Google for 8.5 years as a senior software engineer. The last three years of which was spent at Google-owned YouTube.

With much regret, my former employer YouTube has now become a direct threat to the United States of America and the Republic for which it stands. YouTube is engaging in reckless censorship by doing a mass purge of content creators it deems “brand unsafe.”

Why would Google take actions that seemingly squash the clear exchange of ideas and differing points of view? Doesn’t that seem to interfere with free speech? The election? In fact, this is EXACTLY the case. Google is deliberately attempting to influence the election by preventing certain opinions from being shared.

Here are just a few of the Youtube channels that were deleted last week by Google/Youtube:

This behavior is nothing short of an election coup!

People may think that the phrase “election coup” is too strong, maybe even hyperbole. Google wouldn’t ACTUALLY want to do a coup… would they?

As someone who saw the inside of Google, my answer to this is: “Yes, without ANY doubt”.

I know because I saw it with my own eyes. It took me several years of watching Google build this election-rigging machine before I came to the conclusion that Google would certainly try to steal the 2020 election. This was not something they tried to hide.  Instead, they carefully documented as a huge project named “Machine Learning Fairness” – which I downloaded and disclosed to the public in August of 2019. The disclosure is 950 pages and can be seen here.

Don’t just take my word for it, Jen Gennai, a current high level Google director, admitted last year to an undercover journalist that only something the size of Google could “prevent the next Trump situation”.

As a former employee, I understand the scale of Google. I am terrified about what could happen to me for fighting the biggest election rigging machine the world has ever known.

What is one small individual like myself compared to this GIANT? If I were Google I would have this company whistleblower killed. Does this sound outlandish? Here is what Google did to me when I sent that 950 pages to the DOJ in August of 2019:

What you see here is a wellness check that included the San Francisco Police department, the FBI and the Bomb squad. I wish I was making this up but it actually happened.

This is a David VS Goliath moment

The only thing that terrifies me more than dying and my family being targeted is the world that Google is building for all of us. This is really our last stand. This is more than a coup on the US election, if Google wins it will be a coup on humanity. Why? Because Google see’s YOU as a programmable unit; programmable via its control of the information they return to you when you use Google search, Google news and YouTube. For example, this Google slide details how the company manipulates you.

(link)

This intention to program YOU (the American Public) is also found in other documents from the company:

This is not a “Left vs Right” or “Conservative vs Liberal” issue

This fight has nothing to do with politics. It is a fight for the future of humanity. I do this not just for you, but also for your children, your children’s children and for generations to come. They deserve the free world that we inherited. The torch of freedom must be passed on.

This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to stand together and fight against Google. As a single person I mean nothing. It has always been YOU, the American people that has made this fight possible. Together Google CAN and WILL be stopped!

Stand with me and FIGHT NOW!  I am putting $5k of my own money into this to say “no more”. Others have done the same. Stand with us with a donation of $5, $10 or $15 dollars which together will fund this emergency injunction.

Amplify, share and like this story as much as Big Tech will allow. Time is of the essence.  We are being censored. Go NOW to all social media platforms and SHARE punchgoogle.com. Share it with your friends, your family and your co-workers.

Regardless of your political affiliation, together we can TOPPLE Google and restore freedom of speech to our land. Pledge now. And make sure you tell your friends about this campaign found at punchgoogle DOT com (which will redirect to this gofundme).

Thank you,

~Zach

About the Attorney Cris Armenta

I want to mention that I (Zach Vorhies) did an extensive vetting of many attorneys across the country. Cris Armenta was the one with the strongest knowledge about how to defeat Google.

The necessary criteria for selection includes:

1. The attorney practices in California.
2. The attorney has specific knowledge and strategy on how to attack YouTube/Google.
3. The attorney are prepared to file the suit immediately.

It turns out the Google/YouTube terms of service requires that the person sue Google in California. Although the venue could possibly be challenged in court, doing so adds additional risk.

What sealed the deal beyond the conversation about legal strategy was also the coincidence that Cris Armenta was also selected by my friend and YouTube content creator “Young Pharaoh” (500k subs on YouTube) to represent him in his case against YouTube. Cris Armenta’s case history against Google means she has a well thought out strategy. After going in depth and playing a bunch of angles with Cris Armenta during the vetting process it was clear why “Young Pharaoh” chose Cris Armenta to represent him.

LEGAL STRATEGY

This is essentially a breach of contract lawsuit against Google.

Here’s the brief summary of our strategy:

1. Case to be filed by the top conservative accounts that were purged on October 15, 2020.

2. Google/YouTube violated its own Terms of Service by shutting down the accounts because they can only do so when 3 conditions existed by their own TOS.

3. They claim they were shut down for repeated violations and harassment.

4. But, the channels were not repeaters nor did they harass, and the new harassment policy was enacted in a way to complete decimate these channels specifically.

5. The Plaintiffs will be seeking a TRO or emergency injunction to put the channels back up.

6. The Plaintiffs have a First Amendment right to speak, large reach, and there is “state action” in so far as Representative Schiff demanded that “conspiracy” channels come down and HR 1154 condemned the type of speech up on these channels.

7. This is a First Amendment case, but it will be simplified by holding YouTube accountable to the very TOS it itself imposed.

8. The attorneys involved have extensive experience in litigating with Google and are shaping up the case to either win at the Ninth Circuit (President flipped the circuit) or to create clear path for the amendment of Section 230.

9. Last week, SCOTUS declined to hear the case where the Ninth Circuit said that 230 immunity is NOT “boundless.”

10. We have a good chance of success and paring back the Section 230 immunity and getting the conservative pro-Trump content back up before the election, just in time, if we are funded adequately.

An in-depth discussion about the legal strategy can be viewed in the following video (around 45 minutes).

Q&A

Q: When will the injunction be filed?

A: Assuming this crowdfunding reaches the funding goal, the injunction will be filed by the end of the week. Around the 26th or sooner.

Q: Can I be a party to the suit?

A: Yes, we have an open call for those that have been wrongly terminated by YouTube for political reasons. If this sounds like you, please fill out this form.

Q: Is a class action status being considered?

A: Yes.

Q: How can I book an interview with Zach?

A: Use this link to book a zoom meeting.

Q: Can the donation be tax deductible?

A: Yes! We allow a tax-deductible charitable donation, just follow this link.

Q: Who is Ryan Hartwig and why is he connected to this campaign?

A: Ryan Hartwig is a Facebook whistleblower that I have been working with for a number of months. Ryan has an Arizona non-profit. All funds will be donated to legal fees and costs.

Legal Disclaimer

The donations will be used to fund a lawsuit against Google, YouTube and Alphabet directed to speech that is protected by the First Amendment and that was purged from YouTube through demonetizations, terminations or suspensions in violation of the YouTube Terms of Service.  The donations will be used to fund attorneys’ fees and costs on behalf of the named Plaintiffs in the lawsuit, and any Plaintiffs thereafter added.  All donations of any amount are welcome, but only funds from U.S. citizens and permanent residents will be accepted.  All donated funds will be used solely to defray attorneys’ fees and other costs related to this legal representation.  By donating, the donors agree that they understand that they have no authority to direct the representation or have access to confidential client or privileged communications. Any unused funds at the conclusion of the representation will be returned to The Hartwig Foundation for Free Speech.

By Pete Santilli – WKRPete In Cincinnati

This morning I received the following document in a Telegram news/chat thread (H/T Ashley S.) which was submitted on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein’s victim, Virginia Giuffre:

 

Here’s what we know:  “BSF – Bois Schiller Flexner” was founded by Heather King, and according to connecting websites King is still active in the firm. Who is Heather King & why does it matter? It matters because, it was discovered in the confidential emails contained on Hunter Biden’s laptop that Heather King was representing Biden’s interest in Burisma :

13. Attorney-Client Communi… by Pete SantilliIt goes much deeper than Heather King being conne

It is important to understand who Heather King is because when you take a closer look at her ties to Hunter Biden you quickly learn she is deeply connected to the Clinton Crime Family. Now on the face of it you might say that isn’t so surprising given that the Clinton’s and the Biden’s have a long history of connectivity as almost every liberal politician in Washington, DC does, but there is a surprising connection that suggests there is a very murky relationship between the Clintons, the Bidens, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein’s most publicly known victim, and Heather King & BSF.

  Heather King of BSF, we learn much about her professional experience and connections to the Clintons through her own Linked-In page:

It is also important to note her “Human Rights” advocacy on behalf of exploited “girls worldwide”, as well as her direct connection to the Clinton Foundation. Given that she is a representing attorney to the now questionable Hunter Biden, who’s  sex tapes are being reported to show the middle-aged son of Joe Biden having sex with underage girls, and the accusations that the Clintons were deeply involved in the Jeffrey Epstein exploitation of young girls, we find it interesting that Heather King is also heading up some pretty serious recruiting efforts to bring young girls into DC politics under the guise and promise to protect them from the exact type of men (sexual-predator politicians) she vigorously represents.

Deep State government bureaucrats, media & silicon valley censors would immediately call this  “conspiracy theory” for thinking or discussing these connections, dismissing them as coincidental, unrelated or speculative, but when you understand that the firm Heather King founded, is a partner, and is still deeply rooted in is also representing and advising Virginia Roberts-Giuffre who just happens to be the number-one accuser of Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell,  it becomes abundantly clear that Heather King is much more than just another attorney who represents Hunter Biden and his interest in Burisma.

HERE ARE SOME FACTS:

• The Laptop From Hell reportedly contains damning information related to the Biden Family’s alleged corruption and money laundering in the Ukraine through Burisma.
• Burisma’s largest client is Arcelor-Mital, owned by the Clinton Foundation’s top donor, Ukraine Oligarch Victor Pinchuk.   Hillary Clinton & Victor Pinchuk are documented to have shipped highly specialized steel to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions against Iran. (See Hillary Clinton & Ukrainian Oligarch Shipped Steel To Iran, Potentially Used For Enrichment Via Nuclear Centrifuges – PeterSantilli.com)
• Hunter Biden is reportedly a child/sex abuser, and the Laptop From Hell has been turned over to Delaware State & Federal law enforcement by Former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Former NYPD Police Chief Bernard Kerik.
• All of the legal, financial and allegedly criminal information contained on the laptop is almost certainly in the possession of Chinese Communist Party intelligence officials.
• Heather King of BSF, a purported advocate for the prevention of exploitation of women is representing Hunter Biden, an alleged child/sex abuser who is currently under investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigations.
• Per her LinkedIn profile, Heather King is also very well connected to Hillary Clinton, The Clinton Foundation, and one of the most notorious sexual abusers & rapists in the world, former U.S. President William Jefferson Clinton. (See “You’d Better Put Ice On That” – Juanita Broderick  and The Clinton’s War On Women – Roger Stone)
• Heather King and her BSF law firm is centrally connected to Hillary Clinton, The Clinton Foundation, Hunter Biden, Burisma and their top client Arcelor-Mital; owned by Victor Punchuk; the Clinton Foundation’s top donor, as well as Virginia Roberts-Giuffre in the Jeffrey Epstein / Ghislaine Maxwell case.

Coincidence?  For those of us who have spent a decade connecting the people in the Clinton circle of abuse, there are no coincidences. We can only wonder if Virginia Roberts-Giuffre was informed by her BSF attorneys that they’ve been working for the Clintons in various capacities since 1999 .. If not, then why? And if she does know, then the question that begs to be answered is; just exactly who is Virginia “Roberts” Giuffre?

(Programming note: Please tune in to the live broadcast of The Pete Santilli Show for analysis of this explosive report tonight, Sunday October 25, 2020 at 6pm EST Visit: PeteSantilli.mobi for links on how you can watch the show on the Range Broadcasting Network.)

 

Read all the emails that have been made public by Rudy Giuliani here:

Burisma Connected to Pinchuk by Pete Santilli