Around 2005, when former Director of the CIA (2013-2017) an admitted “communist voter ” John Brennan was in the private sector as CEO of The Analysis Corporation, he and his IC soldier James Clapper, along with other openly communist Deep-Staters such as James Comey (New Yorker Magazine regarding Comey’s admission: ” in ’84, “I voted for Reagan—I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now. I’m not even sure how to characterize myself politically. Maybe at some point, I’ll have to figure it out.” ) were building the most powerful data collection hubs in the world.
Before assuming their post as heads of the top 2 U.S. spy agencies – the CIA and FBI – self-described communist party sympathizers Brennan and Comey were getting rich as tier 1 CIA contractors; Brennan as CEO of The Analysis Corporation, and Comey as General Counsel for Lockheed Martin. These indisputable facts can be verified through open-sourced research, but their direct involvement in building their own “data printing press” — because, as we all know, data is the new global currency —- in Fort Washington, Maryland. Although this indisputable fact can be verified by connecting various dots in the Federal Court system, the main hub of the criminal enterprise Brennan, Comey and Clapper built in Fort Washington Maryland is classified, and illegally protected under a “National Security – States Secret Privilege” executed by former Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte. Essentially, Brennan, Comey and Clapper, et. al’s crimes against the United State of America have been unlawfully shielded by Negroponte’s State Secret’s classification, and anyone with SAP level security clearances who have been “read-in” cannot publicly verify these facts, and in my opinion, are cowards and complicit co-conspirators who remain silent about crimes being perpetrated at Fort Washington Maryland by hiding behind their security clearances.
The computer system housed in Fort Washington Maryland is the most powerful cyber-surveillance system in the world that was originally designed after 9-11 to go get the bad guys overseas. As I have been told, and as I have verified in several federal court cases, the system has the same access to global communications and surveillance capabilities as the NSA, except without the Constitutional constraints and limitations as the NSA. Brennan/Comey/Clapper et. al. built a separate, parallel NSA surveillance system which is accessed without any limitation by private contractors within the intelligence community, and of course, protected and guarded on U.S. soil by the Central Intelligence Agency. The servers at Fort Washington Maryland also became the new location for the FBI child-porn websites after they were caught operating child porn websites on U.S. soil, and on U.S. government property (for the purposes of ‘investigating child pornography’, at one time, the was the world’s largest distributor of child pornography.). This is not conspiracy theory; it is a fact which can be verified on the federal court docket.
A lengthy and comprehensive investigation of Fort Washington Maryland has revealed that Brennan/Comey/Clapper et. al.’s child porn servers are utilized by the intelligence community for covert communications worldwide. They use the chat systems on child porn websites to communicate operational orders, and operational security is easily maintained because anyone accessing their child porn websites would immediately be arrested and incarcerated if the individual strays from the criminal cabal’s agenda. This is also not a conspiracy theory, as the U.S. government has publicly acknowledged that forensic data containing, among many other things, evidence of Supreme Court Justice John Roberts accessing at least 7 various child porn websites, is in safe keeping with the CIA’s Office of Inspector General. As anyone can imagine, making this information public is a very complex process, especially in a very corrupt federal judiciary which is also surrounded and protected by complicit current and former U.S. military and government officials who have been “read-in” and choose to maintain their secrecy clearances in favor of preserving prospects of future wealth; at the expense of the United States of America.
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ANYONE — FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OR U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE — ATTEMPTING TO SUPPRESS THIS INFORMATION BY INVOKING A “STATES SECRET PRIVILEGE”: BE ADVISED THAT THIS INFORMATION, WHICH WAS OBTAINED BY SOURCES WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE, PHYSICAL ACCESS AND SAP-LEVEL CLEARANCE, CANNOT BE PROTECTED BY NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS. IT IS VERY WELL SETTLED LAW AND LITIGATED OVER MANY YEARS THAT A STATES-SECRET CLASSIFICATION CANNOT BE APPLIED TO CRIMES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. IF YOU ARE INSTRUCTED TO SUPPRESS THIS INFORMATION UNDER THE GUISE OF PROTECTING NATIONAL SECURITY SECRETS, YOU ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO IMMEDIATELY SEEK COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL, AS YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR COMPLICITY IN COVERING UP EVIDENCE OF CRIMES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Location information:
“Federal Communications Center” Department of Defense Security Institute Interagency Training Center Office of Special Technology 10530 Riverview Road, Ft Washington MD
Please visit PistolPeteStore.com to order a MyPillow 2.0 to be shipped directly to Charlie Cain’s office. 100% of all net proceeds (net = total proceeds minus shipping costs) will be donated to LindellOffenseFund.org.
For content producers & show hosts, please promote this campaign so that we can get a TRUCKLOAD of pillows shipped to Charlie Cain’s office. Visit the following links to download videos and graphics you can use on your show. (Dropbox or Google Drive. Both contain the same files)
Of the many hundreds of cases related to political persecution following the FBI-led incident on January 6th in the United States of America, American patriot activist Kirstyn Niemela’s situation stands as the most prominent example of the extensive nature of the alleged conspiracy against the nation.
After a recent interview with Pete Santilli, Kirstyn Niemela’s name will be forever inscribed in stone on the wall of patriots who are stopping at nothing to help preserve our country — demonstrating truth, integrity, and honor. Niemela’s harrowing encounter with the federal judiciary and her defense attorneys ultimately led to her conviction at trial. However, she is not squandering a single moment between now and when she is scheduled to report to prison on July 25th, 2023. Her aim is to alert the public about her ordeal, the experiences of her fellow January 6th defendants, as well as the deception purportedly perpetrated upon the public.
In this interview, Pete Santilli makes some startling claims based on his personal firsthand knowledge and experience. He discusses not only the alleged corruption within the federal judiciary but also his personal interactions with the attorneys he has collaborated with over the past couple of years. One explosive revelation that impacts every American, not just the January 6th defendants, is that one of the attorneys in the recent Proud Boys Trial failed to bring forward key witnesses who had investigated the January 6th incident using facial recognition technology. A handful of federal employees, potentially including some subcontractors, have been keen to testify under oath that they’ve identified through facial recognition that the “majority of subjects at the first U.S. Capitol barricade breach and the second breach were primarily feds.” Regrettably, this information was given to attorney Roger Roots during the Proud Boys Trial, and he not only failed to introduce this testimony and evidence during the trial, but he has also made no public mention of these whistleblowers or proof of their existence.
Can the public speculate that the alleged misconduct and incompetence of the defense attorney were intentional? Considering the revelations from the interview conducted on Saturday, July 15, 2023, the total circumstances stemming from defense attorneys’ alleged negligence, malpractice, incompetence, and sabotage lead Pete Santilli and Kirstyn Niemala to feel obligated to alert the public. These defense attorneys are frequently asking for “donations” from supporters and are reportedly not fulfilling their responsibilities to donors to at least perform as basic, competent legal defense counselors for the January 6th Defendants. These revelations are shocking, and the details you will hear in this interview are sobering.
<
During a late night call to an apparently inebriated John Pierce, Pete Santilli confronts Pierce about his outlandish theory that Ashli Babbitt LISTEN TO THE FULL RECORDING OF THE CALL HERE
To fully comprehend the situation, it’s important to understand why Kirstyn Niemela became one of the high-value targets for the alleged deep state coup plotters:
Niemela is an openly gay individual who staunchly believes in individual rights and freedoms. She refuses to surrender her individuality to any political movement, including those aligned with gay collectivism, and vehemently opposes pedophiles.
She attended the January 6th rally in Washington, D.C., driven by a belief that many informed Americans share with complete certainty: elections worldwide have been manipulated by entities like the CIA, with the USA serving as their final target.
On that day, she found herself surrounded by undercover federal agents from various agencies, including the FBI and DHS, as well as numerous intelligence agencies and active-duty military personnel reporting to the FBI. These government and military personnel allegedly employed a Constitutional “end-around” to execute a ‘color revolution’ coup on January 6th, in collaboration with individuals known by the FBI as Nazi Ukrainian nationals.
Niemela courageously confronted the alleged deep state; she rejected plea deals, insisted on a jury trial, and demanded to testify on her own behalf during the trial. Despite being aware of the unfavorable odds, she remained resolute in her pursuit to get the truth on the record.
Besides facing the government’s full force, Niemela’s defendant status exposed her to a side of the judiciary system that most Americans never witness: her defense attorneys appeared to be working either knowingly or unknowingly to further the government’s agenda, directly opposing her right to due process and her constitutional rights to free speech, peaceful assembly, and redress of grievances against her government. Niemela learned a tough lesson about the true essence of the 6th Amendment, the right to “effective assistance of counsel.” The FBI, DHS, judge, prosecutors, and defense attorneys seemed to have all collaborated to produce the results the government had engineered even before January 6th. They appeared ready to use every means necessary to “get their pound of flesh.”
DC District Federal Court Judge Christopher R. Cooper exhibited extreme bias and arguably demonstrated a lack of justice throughout Kirstyn Niemala’s entire legal saga. This bias seemingly began long before January 6th, 2021, potentially during Cooper’s education at Yale University, which is considered a breeding ground for America’s secret societies, or during his time at Stanford University, known for its alleged CIA campus operations. Cooper’s nomination by Barack Obama appears to have paid off, at least in Niemala’s criminal trial, as he is accused of engineering one of the most flagrant miscarriages of justice amongst all the January 6th trials. An example of his alleged prejudice is reflected in a comment Cooper made on the official court record during Niemala’s sentencing hearing:
When you talk about saving the children, I think you were wearing a T-shirt that said “Save the Children.” If that is believing that there is some conspiracy among certain politicians to, you know, traffic in child pornography or that they’re pedophiles or, you know, some other crazier stuff that QAnon has been spouting, all that shows me is that you are completely detached from reality — all right? — which is relevant to the deterrent value of the sentence that I have to impose.
Maintaining her composure and dignity, Niemala has publicly responded to Judge Cooper’s remarks about “Save the Children,” suggesting that he purchase a ticket to see “Sound Of Freedom.”
Pete Santilli has publicly shared alleged details of attorney John Pierce and Roger Roots’ incompetence in Niemala’s case. For the first time, Santilli revealed that Roger Roots and lead attorney Brett Whipple were fired by Cliven Bundy approximately one month before the main Bundy trial for their apparent lack of preparedness. Santilli also stated that the defendants’ extensive preparation for the 2017 trial ultimately led to the Nevada Bundy case being dismissed mid-trial. Seven years later, Roger Roots is accused of contributing to Kirstyn Niemala’s unjust sentencing, and when she needed them most, Pierce and Roots essentially abandoned her.
In the ten remaining days before Kirstyn Niemala is required to report to federal prison, she plans to seize every opportunity to inform the public about her legal case. She also intends to discuss the disturbing and questionable conduct of attorneys who represent other January 6 defendants. Here’s a brief list that Niemala believes needs to be shared with the general public:
Attorneys John Pierce and Roger Roots have allegedly been unethically soliciting clients and donations without securing approval from the court to receive compensation through the Criminal Justice Act (CJA). Pete Santilli’s investigation has gathered an extensive number of witnesses, including former employees of John Pierce’s firm who claim they have not been paid, as well as numerous current and former January 6 defendants and their family members.
Many witnesses have provided detailed accounts of Pierce and Roots allegedly mismanaging their retainer fees and missing crucial court deadlines and hearings. Several witnesses have claimed to have personally observed John Pierce struggling with rumored issues of alcohol and substance abuse while performing his duties as their attorney.
To support her claims, Kirsten Niemala has documented every text, email correspondence and court filing in order for her to appeal her conviction on several grounds. Additionally, Niemala has worked tirelessly to obtain witness statements and documentation regarding John Pierce’s devastating impact on many other January 6th defendants.
The circumstances surrounding Kirstyn Niemala’s case are deeply concerning and bring forth numerous questions about the integrity of the justice system and those who work within it. The alleged biases, misconduct, and ethical transgressions outlined throughout this account are both startling and disheartening, shedding light on a potential hidden underbelly of the justice system rarely visible to the public eye.
Niemala’s experiences serve as a stark reminder that we must continually demand transparency, fairness, and accountability in our legal proceedings. The actions of figures like Judge Christopher R. Cooper, attorneys John Pierce, and Roger Roots, as alleged by Niemala and Pete Santilli, signal a need for rigorous scrutiny and, if substantiated, actionable reform.
In the face of adversity and injustice, Niemala continues to advocate for truth and integrity, highlighting the potential flaws in the system. As she prepares to serve her sentence, her efforts to expose these issues are commendable and essential for ongoing public discourse around the events on January 6th 2021.
Niemala’s story serves as a call to action for us all, urging vigilance, questioning, and accountability in the pursuit of justice. It underscores the importance of maintaining an open and honest dialogue about the events surrounding January 6th, the individuals involved, and the systems that preside over their fate. As Niemala herself has shown, no stone should be left unturned in the quest for truth.
If you have any information relevant to the ongoing January 6th investigation, particularly as it relates to defense attorney corruption and potential malpractice, please sent a confidential email to Pete Santilli at tips4pete[at]protonmail.com. If you are a federal agent, government employee or potential whistleblower with knowledge of illegal, unethical or government misconduct, please contact Pete Santilli to be connected with a network of attorneys knowledgable about the process of conveying your information, safeguarding your identify and obtaining whistleblower protection. Send an email to tips4pete[at]protonmail.com
We all need to rally & support Kystyn Niemala, as she has sacrificed everything to continue fighting to bring the truth to the American people. Please visit her Give Send Go and contrubute however much you can. http://givesendgo.com/freekirstyn
MAJOR NEWS ALERT: MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT IMMINENT AGAINST THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.
An event in the Federal court system has occurred that will undoubtedly shock the conscience of the American people. This is the biggest revelation about the deep state ever to be fully publicly…
Alina Habba, an attorney for former President Donald Trump, told Newsmax on Wednesday that if a federal grand jury indicts her client for his handling of classified documents, it would be a “complete mishandling and weaponization” of the Department of Justice.
The Independent reported Wednesday the DOJ is set to ask a Washington grand jury that Trump be charged with violations under the Espionage Act and for obstruction of justice regarding his handling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Just the News, citing multiple people familiar with the case, also reported federal prosecutors notified Trump that he is a criminal target and likely to be indicted imminently.
“We don’t know that, but I’ve heard that obviously being floated around,” Habba told “Carl Higbie FRONTLINE.” “Imagine, we have Hillary Clinton. You have [Barack] Obama. You have [President Joe] Biden. You have [George W.] Bush, tons of people that have had declassification, clarification issues with NARA [the National Archives and Records Administration], which effectively is all it should or would have been if he was not Donald Trump.
“If they do come out with an indictment, I can tell you that it is complete mishandling and weaponization of the DOJ, because we’ve seen this exact problem with other presidents, and they’re not treated the same.”
Habba said she learned of news that Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff in Trump’s final year in office, has been working with the prosecution to get a plea deal and be granted immunity to testify against Trump. It is not known if his testimony is for the classified documents case or for an investigation into Trump’s role in the events of Jan. 6, 2021.
“What we’re hearing is that he was granted immunity,” she said. “Effectively, he would be a key witness against the president and give testimony in opposition of him.
“As we’ve seen, time and time again, this is what they did to Allen Weisselberg in New York. This is what they do time and again to anybody that is close to the Trump world, because they have nothing.
“So, they have to squeeze people, scare people, and intimidate them into testifying and in the direction that they want. It’s very disturbing.”
Weisselberg, 75, former chief financial officer in the Trump Organization, pleaded guilty to 15 felonies in his role in a tax-fraud scheme and served five months in prison. In exchange, Weisselberg testified against two entities of the Trump Organization, which were convicted and fined the maximum penalty of $1.6 million. The Trump family was not involved in either case.
Habba said her legal team is fighting an uphill battle in trying to prove the DOJ’s targeting of Trump is malfeasance of prosecution.
“I think that’s what we’re trying to do, but I will tell you it’s not enough,” she said. “We have not seen enough and they better start moving faster, because you see people like [U.S. Rep.] Jim Jordan [R-Ohio]. I think he’s really a pioneer of this, of bringing up to Congress and saying, There is a major problem in this country and we have to fix it.”
“I don’t like seeing my client be the example,” she added, “and it’s not fair. It’s not fair to any Republican. It’s not fair to my client. But it’s also not fair to Americans. It’s not constitutionally appropriate.”
About NEWSMAX TV:
NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!
Find NEWSMAX in over 100 million U.S. homes via cable/streaming – More Info Here
Federal prosecutors have notified Donald Trump that he is a criminal target and likely to be indicted imminently in a probe into alleged classified documents – even as the Justice Department declined to delay charges to give time to investigate allegations of witness tampering submitted by the former president’s legal team, according to multiple people on Wednesday familiar with the case.
The sources directly familiar with the case told Just the News that DOJ declined to delay the planned indictment of Trump to investigate allegations that a senior prosecutor working on the case tried to influence a key witness by discussing a federal judgeship with the witness’ lawyer.
That allegation is still pending in a secret case before Chief U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg, the jurist who oversees the federal court in Washington, D.C., and the grand juries that convene in that courthouse, the sources said.
An historic federal indictment crafted by Special Counsel Jack Smith could be handed up by a federal grand jury against the 45th president as early as this week, the sources said.
Trump has already been indicted in a Manhattan court on charges he falsified business expenses to hide hush money payments to a porn star and has pleaded innocent.
Trump has portrayed both cases as part of a broader “witch hunt” and dual system of justice designed to derail his 2024 presidential candidacy.
This week, Trump argued Smith is a partisan and the federal case against him is being treated differently than one against President Joe Biden, who also was found with classified documents in his possession from his time as vice president.
“HOW CAN DOJ POSSIBLY CHARGE ME, WHO DID NOTHING WRONG, WHEN NO OTHER PRESIDENT’S WERE CHARGED, WHEN JOE BIDEN WON’T BE CHARGED FOR ANYTHING,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform in a post in which he also railed against the failure of DOJ to charge Hillary Clinton in 2016 over classified emails kept on her private email server.
“ONLY TRUMP – THE GREATEST WITCH HUNT OF ALL TIME!” he added.
Federal prosecutors deny politics have been involved in their pursuit of Trump.
Smith’s prosecutorial team informed Trump’s legal team in recent days that the charges against the former president could include a violation of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37 Section 793 that outlaws the “gathering, transmitting or losing” of national defense information. Other charges being considered involve alleged false statements and obstruction of justice, all claims the president and his team have robustly contested in public and in private.
No prior or sitting American president has ever been indicted in federal court, and if the grand jury accepts the prosecutors’ case it will touch off an unprecedented legal battle certain to work its way to the Supreme Court while lingering over the 2024 election in which Trump handily leads the GOP field by as many as 50 points in some polls.
According to multiple sources familiar with the ongoing probe, all of whom talked to Just the News on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media:
Trump’s lawyers have prepared a robust defense based on months of legal research, anticipating Smith might pursue charges. Trump’s lawyers are prepared to argue that a president had broad powers under the Constitution to keep documents or declassify without any fanfare documents from his presidency and take them with him upon leaving office.
They will rely heavily on a U.S. District Court case in Washington more than a decade ago involving former President Bill Clinton that concluded a president had broad and mostly unchallengeable power to determine which documents from his presidency can be kept personally and that any documents moved to Trump’s homes in Mar-a-Lago, Fla., and Bedminster, N.J., fall under that category.
An American Bar Association report in 2022 seemed to agree with Trump’s assertion that “guidelines support his contention that presidents have broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected, while they are in office.”
Prosecutors plan to counter that authority does not extend to documents containing National Defense Information whose retention or release could jeopardize national security.
They have purportedly introduced to grand jury witnesses a recording Trump’s office made in 2021 during an interview with former chief of staff Mark Meadows’ biographers in which the former president allegedly talked about a document he described as classified and in his possession allegedly written by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley that outlined a war plan against Iran.
While prosecutors have not located an exact document matching Trump’s description, they found one with classified markings written by others laying out an Iranian battle plan that Trump returned to the National Archives more than a year ago.
Trump lawyers have developed evidence showing that information from that plan was leaked to a major magazine by a senior military officer and plan to use that as evidence that it no longer can be considered National Defense Information, according to people familiar with both sides of the case.
But one of the first disputes likely to be addressed is evidence the Trump defense team submitted to Boasberg in a secret court proceeding recently and to Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco’s office Monday alleging a senior federal prosecutor working on the case discussed a federal judgeship with a defense lawyer for a key witness.
Monaco’s office informed the Trump team in the last 24 hours that it was rejecting a request to delay the indictment so the allegation could be investigated.
The lawyer was already in line for consideration by the Biden White House for a judgeship when the prosecutor allegedly raised the nomination while trying to get additional testimony from the lawyer’s client, according to sources familiar with the allegation.
The discussion raised concerns among defense lawyers that it was an effort to influence the witness, who has declined to change his testimony because he claims to have no other information about the movement of boxes and artifacts at Mar-a-Lago since he left the White House, the sources said.
Joe Biden bribery allegations involve Ukraine, first raised with FBI in 2017, key investigator says
Allegations that Joe Biden partook in a $5 million bribery scheme involve Ukraine where his son scored a lucrative energy job and were first presented to the FBI by a reliable and well-paid informant back in 2017, House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer told Just the News on Tuesday evening.
Comer made the bombshell revelation just a day after reviewing an FBI FD-1023 form that memorialized the informant’s allegations, and two days before he plans to hold a vote in Congress to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt for failing to provide a copy to his committee as demanded by a subpoena. He said the version of the informant report he was allowed to review by Wray had about 10% of information redacted and made clear the allegations were first reported to the FBI back in 2017 as Donald Trump was beginning his term as president.
“Yes, it is Ukraine,” Comer told the Just the News, No Noise television show when asked what country the alleged bribery involved. “This form 1023 involves a business person from Ukraine, who allegedly sent a bribe, a substantial bribe to then Vice President Joe Biden.”
Asked whether the allegation involved the Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, whose Burisma Holdings energy firm first hired Hunter Biden into a lucrative board and consulting job in 2014 when Joe Biden was vice president, Comer carefully demurred. “I probably better punt on that question. The name was redacted,” the powerful House committee chairman answered.
But Comer said markings on the document he was shown – including footnotes – made clear the informant first provided the bribery allegations to the FBI in 2017 and then again one more time before he raised them a third time in the June 2020 informant report
“This first started in 2017,” he said, citing footnotes in the informant report he reviewed that listed two prior reports. “There are two notes, or footnotes, whatever you want to call them. They listed them as notes. I will say footnotes for better explanation, that reference 2017. And it was either 2018 or 2019. So this wasn’t the first time that the informant had mentioned a bribery scheme pertaining to Joe Biden to the FBI.
Comer’s disclosures came the same day that his colleague in the Senate, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, revealed the FBI informant who provided the intelligence was deemed so credible and valuable that he was paid $200,000 by the bureau over several years. The comments by the two GOP lawmakers pushed back on Democrat claims that the allegations were old, disproven or tied to an effort by attorney Rudy Giuliani to investigate the Bidens’ Ukraine ties that led to Trump’s first impeachment in 2019.
“Partisan media, most likely in conjunction with the Biden FBI, have misleadingly reported the 1023 is from a tranche of information provided by Rudy Giuliani. News reports last week dispel that notion and make clear the 1023 information that we request is independent of Giuliani,” Grassley stated in a speech given on the Senate floor.
“Those news reports also show that the source who formed the basis of the 1023 is a long-serving FBI source. The source reportedly received numerous validations from the FBI. The source reportedly operated even during the Obama administration. Based on what I’ve been told about yesterday’s meeting, the FBI didn’t contradict these findings,”
“Today, I can say that based upon unclassified and legally protected whistleblower disclosures the FBI source in the 1023 has been paid at least two-hundred thousand dollars by the FBI since the source was opened and operational,” he added. “High dollar payments obviously mean the FBI believes the source to be credible and reputable.”
Comer said the informant’s core allegation is a Ukrainian businessman was to pay $5 million to the Biden family in return for a U.S. policy decision that Joe Biden could impact. He said his investigators have not yet found any money directly to the current president but they are “following the money” through numerous limited liability corporations and bank accounts and have begun a search for off-shore accounts as well.
“When you first read about it, it’s hard to believe,” he said. “It’s hard to believe that a vice president of the United States would try to take a bribe from a from a foreign national, in a company in a country that’s, at the time not noted for anything other than a lot of corruption, and then asked that the money be sent through shell companies and various banks to launder it to where no one would know about it,” he said.
Comer said he has strong reason to believe the FBI never properly investigated the Biden bribery allegations, matching a pattern he also saw when the Obama Treasury Department began receiving suspicious activity reports involving transactions associated with Hunter Biden and his associates but did little to investigate them.
“I think what we’re gonna find out is the same thing we found out in the Treasury Department with the Suspicious Activity Reports,” he said. “Once you get in there, there’s a whole lot more of them than what was previously reported. And this particular (1023) form we want is very important. But I can already tell from reading the form, there are other forms, as well. So we don’t know how many form 1023s are pertaining to Biden-bribery.
Grassley suggested the FBI may have ditched the Biden bribery allegations based on an intelligence analysis by FBI analyst Brian Auten in summer 2020 suggesting there was a Russian disinformation campaign making such allegations. Just the News first reported that possibility in a story Monday.
“Did the FBI follow normal investigative process and procedure? Or did they try to sweep it under the rug?” the senator asked. “For example, did the FBI try to improperly use the August 2020 Brian Auten assessment to shut down the 1023 reporting by falsely labeling it disinformation? “
The bureau told Comer on Monday the allegations in the bribery memo are part of an ongoing but unspecified investigation. The lawmaker said he was suspect of that claim. “My theory is they never investigated the claim to begin with, for whatever reason,” he said.
Comer said he hopes the contempt vote slated for Thursday will “send a message to the FBI if they don’t comply with my subpoena in the next 48 hours. And hopefully, from that point on, we can we can start having a better level of cooperation with the FBI.
34 Years Ago Today – The Tiananmen Square Massacre | The Gateway Pundit
On June 4, 1989, hundreds of innocent civilians were shot dead by the Chinese army during a bloody military operation to crush a democratic uprising in Peking’s (Beijing) Tiananmen Square.
Tanks rumbled through the Beijing streets late on June 3rd as the army moved into the square from several directions.
They opened fire randomly on the unarmed protesters.
The injured were rushed to hospital on bicycle rickshaws by frantic residents shocked by the army’s sudden and extreme response to the peaceful mass protest. –BBC
Demonstrators transport a wounded man during the military crackdown in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989. (David Turnley/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images)
Who can forget this brave man?
The bloodshed in Tiananmen Square has come to symbolize the triumph of the spirit over brute force. June 4th is a day we are reminded of the brutality of the communist regime in China.
Paramilitary policemen patrol around Tiananmen Square in Beijing, June 3, 2007, on the eve of the June 4 anniversary. Tiananmen Square was quiet on Monday and China’s media was silent on the bloody crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators that took place there 18 years ago to the day. (REUTERS)
In 2007 President George W. Bush dedicated the “Goddess of Democracy” dedicated to the victims of communism.
More… My brother Joe visited Tiananmen Square ten years ago and sent this photo:
Joe said the Chinese citizens he was traveling with didn’t want to talk about it. They know better.
Footage Friday showed the tense moments a group of pro-LGBT activistsconfrontedparents protesting LGBT indoctrination at a school in Los Angeles, Calif.
The clash unfolded outside the Saticoy Elementary School in North Hollywood as parents displeased with the school’s Pride Month event, organized under the banner “Leave our kids alone,” converged with pro-LGBT activists.
Local media reports the anti-groomer protests were loosely organized by parents via Instagram, and called on protesters to be respectful and peaceful.
Image courtesy: YouTube/Fox 11 Los Angeles
The parents against the sexual grooming of children carried signs reading, “There is no pride in indoctrination,” “Stop sexualizing our kids!” and “Leave our kids alone.”
Police were already on standby at the scene and at one point intervened as the two groups began to get rowdy.
A local news helicopter captured footage of one of the minor skirmishes, however clever editing prevents viewers from being able to see exactly who initiated the clash.
ABC7 reports other than the tiny fracas the protests remained “mostly peaceful.”
The demonstrations come as June 1 marked the beginning of “Pride Month.”
The globalists are increasing their attacks on Infowars and the stakes have never been higher!
If you haven’t done so, please consider donating and visit InfowarsStore.com for merch, nutraceuticals and survival gear.
