Category: Government

  • “They Will Crush You – If You Try to Expose the Truth” – FBI Whistleblower Garrett O’Boyle Ends Hearing with Chilling Warning on FBI Tyranny and Abuse

    “They Will Crush You – If You Try to Expose the Truth” – FBI Whistleblower Garrett O’Boyle Ends Hearing with Chilling Warning on FBI Tyranny and Abuse

    May 18, 2023 at 05:23PM    “They Will Crush You – If You Try to Expose the Truth” – FBI Whistleblower Garrett O’Boyle Ends Hearing with Chilling Warning on FBI Tyranny and Abuse (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

    The House Weaponization Committee held a hearing Thursday on Capitol Hill. Three government whistleblowers from the FBI testified before Congress on Thursday morning.

    On Wednesday Chris Wray’s FBI revoked the security clearances of three agents who espoused questioned the aggressive tactics by the FBI in targeting Trump supporters , conservatives, and pro-Life Americans, according to a letter the FBI sent the subcommittee on Wednesday.

    FBI agents Marcus Allen, Garrett O’Boyle, and Steve Friend had already been suspended for questioning the agency’s handling of the January 6 case and stating their beliefs that the FBI has been weaponized against conservatives.

    Democrats on the Committee ran interference for the FBI. The Democrat members were openly hostile to the witnesses and attacking them continuously.

    At the end of the Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) asked witness and FBI whistleblower Garrett O’Boyle if he would advise his colleagues to come forward. Agent O’Boyle offered this dire assessment.

    Garrett O’Boyle: I would tell them first to pray about it long and hard. And I would tell them I could take it to Congress for them, or I could put them in touch with Congress, but I would advise them not to do it… The FBI will crush you. This government will crush you and your family if you try to expose the truth about things that they are doing that are wrong.

    The FBi took O’Boyle’s income and his security clearance after he spoke out about the FBI targeting parents at school board meetings.

    The FBi needs to make a choice. They can be the FBI or the Stasi. But they can’t be both.

    Via Texas Lindsey.

    via The Gateway Pundit

  • Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Recap: Fiery Moments from Day 1 of Kari Lake Election Court Battle

    Day one of the Kari Lake election challenge investigating potential violations of the signature verification process in Maricopa County was off to a fiery start Wednesday, as Lake’s defense presented evidence most ballots were approved without review.

    The courtroom showdown comes as Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter A. Thompson agreed to hear Lake’s arguments on the signature verification process this week after the Arizona Supreme Court sent the case back to lower courts in March.

    Check out highlights from Wednesday’s hearing below:


    Lake’s attorney Kurt Olsen argued it was not physically possible for 11 workers to have approved 170K signatures on ballots unless they were skipping steps.

    “This isn’t a question of not doing it well enough, Maricopa County simply isn’t doing signature verification,” Olsen later added.




    A whistleblower called to the stand as a witness who worked on election day testified she was sent home early during vote tallies despite ballots still needing to be cured.

    She added before being asked to leave she and other election workers were “catching signatures” that did not match.

    She further added some ballots she’d sent for re-review were sent back because review managers were bombarded with ballots.

    She added she and other workers felt pressured to approve ballots when they were sent back for re-review after having been rejected, saying, “We felt uncomfortable about approving what we had already rejected. We’d already went through them.”

    The whistleblower added that after normal level 1 signature verifiers were sent home early, the signature review process was continued at the County Recorder’s Office, where there were no observers.


    The court also saw damning surveillance footage from inside a ballot counting facility which showed election workers simply approving ballots without scrolling down on their computer monitor to actually verify signatures.

    The witness was subsequently asked about the video, to which she responded, “The person on the right was doing it correctly and the person on the left was not… there’s no possible way to click through that and be able to verify from the past history in order to verify that signature.”


    Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer defended the signature verification process.

    During the hearing, Richer tweeted a comment stating, “This moron doesn’t understand that we can do signature verification from any computer in our office.” He subsequently deleted the tweet which suggested that signature verification may have taken place without proper observer oversight.

    The admission in the deleted tweet was caught by Lake’s team.


    In a stunning admission by Maricopa County’s defense attorney, he admitted the employee seen in the video was fired, however there was no indication his workload was re-processed, meaning several ballots had no signature verification whatsoever.


    Witness Shelby Busch said she verified the video shown was authentic and showed what it was purported to show.


    Another whistleblower testified he was concerned about why there were only three level 2 signature verifiers, when there had been 40 level 1 workers.

    He also added he’d also been sent back ballots he’d rejected for re-review.

    Watch full segments from inside the courtroom below:

    Start below video at 59:18:

    Stay tuned tomorrow for updates from Day 2 of the two-day legal showdown.



    via Infowars

    May 18, 2023 at 07:21AM

  • READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    READ IN FULL: Special counsel John Durham’s final 306-page report

    SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE FULL REPORT

    Special Counsel John Durham released his final, 306-page report investigating the FBI’s probe into former President Donald Trump’s alleged links to Russia.

    The report was released almost exactly four years since the investigation was launched, on the order of Attorney General Bill Barr, in 2019.

     
    FILE – Special counsel John Durham, the prosecutor appointed to investigate potential government wrongdoing in the early days of the Trump-Russia probe, leaves federal court in Washington, May 16, 2022. Durham ended his four-year investigation into possible FBI misconduct in its probe of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The report Monday, May 15, 2023, from Durham offers withering criticism of the bureau but a meager court record that fell far short of the former president’s prediction he would uncover the “crime of the century.” (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

    Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

    The report offers criticism of the FBI, finding that it caused “severe reputational harm” in its handling of the case, which was “seriously deficient” at key spots. Durham wrote that the FBI embraced “seriously flawed information” that fell short of the agency’s “own principles regarding objectivity and integrity.”

    Durham also alleged hypocrisy on the FBI’s part, noting the contrast between its handling of accusations regarding foreign meddling in Trump and Hillary Clinton’s campaigns.

    He found that the Steele Dossier, the casus beli for the investigation, was deeply flawed, and the FBI was unable to corroborate “a single substantive allegation. The agency went through with the investigation despite “a complete lack of information from the Intelligence Community that corroborated the hypothesis upon which the… investigation was predicated.”

    via Washington Examiner

    May 15, 2023 at 05:13PM

  • Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    Some House Republicans Call for Holding FBI Director in Contempt of Congress for Failing to Comply With Subpoena

    WASHINGTON—House Republicans appear split on whether to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee that seeks a document with whistleblower allegations that now-President Joe Biden received a bribe from a foreign official.

    In a May 3 letter to Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chairman of the Oversight Committee, and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote that they “have received legally protected and highly credible unclassified whistleblower disclosures.

    “Based on those disclosures, it has come to our attention that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) possess an unclassified FD-1023 form that describes an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions. It has been alleged that the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose.”

    The May 3 subpoena required the FBI to hand over any FD-1023 forms—which note information from confidential human sources—with the word “Biden” in them.

    The FBI refused to comply with the subpoena’s May 10 deadline.

    “It’s clear from the FBI’s response that the unclassified record the Oversight Committee subpoenaed exists, but they are refusing to provide it to the Committee. We’ve asked the FBI to not only provide this record, but to also inform us what it did to investigate these allegations,” said Comer in a May 10 statement. “The FBI has failed to do both. The FBI’s position is ‘trust, but you aren’t allowed to verify.’ That is unacceptable. We plan to follow up with the FBI and expect compliance with the subpoena.”

    “While the FBI has failed to produce the specific document by the subpoena deadline, their offer to provide an accommodation process in response to our legitimate request indicates the document is real,” said Grassley in a statement.

    “So the question remains, what did the FBI do to investigate very serious allegations from an apparent trusted FBI source implicating then-Vice President Biden? Today’s letter from the FBI raises additional questions, including whether the FBI has an open investigation based on these allegations. The American people pay the FBI’s salaries, and they’re entitled to a fulsome response.”

    A spokesperson said that FD-1023 forms are used by agents to record unverified information from confidential sources, and revealing such documents would jeopardize investigations.

    “Revealing unverified or possibly incomplete information could harm investigations, prejudice prosecutions or judicial proceedings, unfairly violate privacy or reputations, create misimpressions in the public, or potentially identify individuals who provide information to law enforcement, placing their physical safety at risk,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

    GOP Members React

    A handful of House GOP members told The Epoch Times on May 12 that they would be willing to hold Wray in contempt of Congress.

    Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) is one of those, having replied with a simple “yes.”

    “I think it’s unbelievable that the FBI is trying to refuse giving a nonclassified document to the Oversight Committee,” he said.

    Reps. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) and Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) said he “absolutely” would vote to hold Wray in contempt of Congress.

    “When you can’t tell me why that document can’t be exposed to people who are on [the House Intelligence Committee], why they have more of a right to intelligence than we do, the people who actually fund that department, when you can’t even do that in a secret capacity, then what are you hiding?” said McCormick.

    “If a credible allegation of bribery against a president can be made, that is an impeachable offense, and the full powers of Congress can be invoked not only to hold obstructionists accountable, but also to compel production of the evidence,” said McClintock.

    Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.), citing that she’s not on the Oversight Committee, said she is “not up on that issue enough to answer the question.”

    When asked on May 12 if they would hold Wray in contempt, Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) answered in the affirmative.

    “If a whistleblower, as they have, has identified a form that the FBI has and then the FBI’s response, it seems like, they did not deny they didn’t have the form but they haven’t turned it over, the American public and Congress need to see this form,” said Lesko. “We need to find out if it implicates the president of the United States. And yes, we need to have action. We need to have teeth. If we issue a subpoena and they don’t answer, we need to follow it up.”

    Rep. Bill Johnson (R-Ohio) demurred.

    “I’m not going to get into the details of the FBI issue, but I will tell you that under the Constitution, we have a system of checks and balances,” he said. “And one of the most important authorities and responsibilities that we have as the voice of the American people is to hold the executive branch and the judicial branch accountable. And it’s a mutual system of checks and balances.”

    Last but not least, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) would not say, when asked by The Epoch Times on May 11, whether there would be a subpoena but did not rule it out.

    “There are checks and balances, and there is oversight. Congress has a right to have that knowledge,” he said. “And I will have a conversation with Director Wray about that and make sure that happens.”

    The Epoch Times reached out to McCarthy’s office to ask if the conversation with Wray happened.

    This article was updated to include a statement from the FBI. 

    via www.theepochtimes.com

    May 12, 2023 at 04:41PM

  • Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    Infowars Reports: There Are Too Many Illegal Border Crossing Sites to Count

    https://ift.tt/q6gkXU5

    Reporting from the U.S.-Mexico border ahead of Title 42 ending Thursday night, Owen Shroyer filmed evidence of illegal immigrant pipelines at border wall gates.

    Owen also stumbled across a historic marker commemorating the Treaty of 1848 that ended the Mexican-American war and established a territorial border.

    He asked if Mexico or the U.S. broke the treaty as we’re currently witnessing millions of illegal immigrants flooding America.


    Because Infowars relies on YOUR SUPPORT in order to continue funding the operation, we urge you to visit the Infowars Store to do your part in the battle against globalism by purchasing great products such as dietary supplements, books, t-shirts, survival gear and much more. Thanks!


    via Infowars

    May 12, 2023 at 07:21AM

  • Explainer: Title 42 is ending at the U.S.-Mexico border. What is it and what happens now?

    Explainer: Title 42 is ending at the U.S.-Mexico border. What is it and what happens now?

    Explainer: Title 42 is ending at the U.S.-Mexico border. What is it and what happens now?

    https://ift.tt/dpMftUv

    WASHINGTON, May 5 (Reuters) – The United States is getting ready to lift COVID-19 restrictions that have blocked migrants caught at the U.S.-Mexico border from seeking asylum since 2020, a major policy shift with humanitarian and political implications.

    WHAT IS TITLE 42?

    The COVID restrictions, known as Title 42, were first implemented under Republican then-President Donald Trump in March 2020 at the beginning of the pandemic. At the time, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the order was needed to stem the spread of the coronavirus in crowded detention settings.

    Title 42 allowed border agents to rapidly expel many migrants to Mexico, but some public health experts, Democrats and advocates criticized its health justification, saying it was part of Trump’s goal of curbing legal and illegal immigration.

    President Joe Biden, a Democrat, took office in 2021 vowing to reverse Trump’s restrictive approach, but kept Title 42 in place and expanded it as his administration grappled with record migrant arrests at the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Since its inception, migrants have been expelled more than 2.7 million times under Title 42, although the total includes many repeat crossers and Mexico has generally only accepted certain nationalities.

    WHAT IS HAPPENING THIS MONTH?

    The Biden administration intends to lift Title 42 next Thursday when the U.S. COVID public health emergency ends.

    Migrants caught crossing the border will again be able to request asylum, a process that can take years to resolve.

    U.S. border officials are preparing for a possible increase in illegal crossings, the result of pent-up demand and the perception among migrants that they will be allowed in.

    The numbers are already climbing. In April, the U.S. Border Patrol apprehended some 183,000 migrants, according to preliminary data provided by Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, a 13 percent increase from March.

    More than 19,000 migrants are currently being held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities, exceeding capacity by 200 percent, according to Judd.

    WHAT IS THE PLAN ONCE TITLE 42 IS GONE?

    To deter would-be migrants after the order is lifted, the Biden administration plans to issue a new regulation. It would deny asylum to most migrants caught crossing if they passed through another country en route to the U.S. without seeking protection or failed to use other legal pathways, which Biden has expanded.

    Migrants walk between the two border fences as they wait for authorities to request asylum in San Ysidro, California, U.S., as seen from Tijuana, Mexico April 29, 2023. REUTERS/Jorge Duenes

    U.S. authorities aim to process migrants in days and swiftly deport them if they fail an initial asylum screening.

    Nearly 500 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) personnel will temporarily be assigned to help with the interviews and the Pentagon will send 1,500 troops to support the Border Patrol on a temporary basis.

    The new Biden regulation toughening access to asylum is expected to face legal challenges. The administration may also struggle to hold migrants at the border and quickly deport them without additional funds from Congress.

    COULD U.S. COURTS OR CONGRESS KEEP TITLE 42 IN PLACE?

    The CDC tried in April 2022 to end Title 42, saying it was no longer needed to limit the spread of COVID-19 in light of vaccines and other medical advances.

    But a federal judge in Louisiana blocked the termination after a challenge brought by two dozen U.S. states with Republican attorneys general, who argued increased migration would saddle their states with costs.

    The U.S. Supreme Court removed a different Title 42 case from their argument calendar in February after the administration told them the order would end along with the COVID emergency. It is unknown whether legal battles could resume after May 11.

    Separately, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators are trying to pass a bill that would grant immigration authorities the power to expel migrants back to Mexico for another two years, though its prospects for passage are unclear.

    HOW ARE U.S. CITIES RESPONDING?

    U.S. border cities are bracing for a possible rise in migrants when Title 42 ends.

    Migrant apprehensions in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley have increased in recent weeks as more Venezuelans are crossing illegally there, according to the U.S. Border Patrol, and the spike in arrivals is straining shelters.

    The Texas cities of Brownsville, El Paso and Laredo have issued emergency declarations.

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott this week resumed a campaign to bus migrants to Democratic-led cities. The Republican governor blames Biden for the rise in crossings and seeks to lessen the burden on border cities.

    New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat whose city has received thousands of migrants on buses from Texas, has called on the federal government to provide more funding for cities welcoming migrants and to expedite migrant work permits.

    Reporting by Ted Hesson in Washington; Additional reporting by Jorge Garcia in Brownsville, Texas; Editing by Mica Rosenberg and Jonathan Oatis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Thomson Reuters

    Ted Hesson is an immigration reporter for Reuters, based in Washington, D.C. His work focuses on the policy and politics of immigration, asylum and border security. Prior to joining Reuters in 2019, Ted worked for the news outlet POLITICO, where he also covered immigration. His articles have appeared in POLITICO Magazine, The Atlantic and VICE News, among other publications. Ted holds a master’s degree from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and bachelor’s degree from Boston College.

    via Reuters

    May 6, 2023 at 09:04AM

  • CIA OPERATIVES COLLUDED WITH TWITTER TO MANUFACTURE J6 EVIDENCE & FRAME TOP INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST

    CIA OPERATIVES COLLUDED WITH TWITTER TO MANUFACTURE J6 EVIDENCE & FRAME TOP INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST

    How Corrupt Is Our Current Situation? It’s Worse Than Most Can Fathom… – The Last Refuge

    The football spiking by AG Merrick Garland today deserves some context, and I am going to take you through a story that will highlight just how bad the situation really is.

    Everything that preceded the 2020 federal election was a complex system of control by a network of ideologues, federal agencies, allies in the private sector, financial stakeholders and corrupt interests all working toward a common goal.  There’s no need to go through the background of how the election was manipulated and how the government and private sector, specifically social media, worked to influence the 2020 outcome because you have all seen it.

    Whether it was local election officials working to control outcomes, federal agencies working to support them (CISA, FBI, DHS), financial interests working to fund them (Zuckerberg et al), or social media platforms controlling the visible content and discussion (Twitter Files, Google, Facebook etc.), the objective was all the same.  It was a massive one-sided operation against the freewill of the American voter.

    In the aftermath of the 2020 election, those same system operators, govt officials, corporate media, private sector groups and social media platforms then circled the wagons to scatter the evidence of their conduct.  If you questioned anything you were a threat.  That’s the context to the dynamic that unfolded.

    Lawfare operatives joined forces with Democrat staffers, and allies in social media platforms all worked in concert to target the voices of anyone who would rise in opposition to the corruption that was stunningly clear in the outcome of the election process.  Corporate media then labeled, isolated, ridiculed and marginalized anyone who dared to point out the obvious.

    When AG Merrick Garland says this of January 6, 2021: […] “the Justice Department has conducted one of the largest, most complex, and most resource-intensive investigations in our history. We have worked to analyze massive amounts of physical and digital data. We have recovered devices, decrypted electronic messages, triangulated phones, and pored through tens of thousands of hours of video. We have also benefited from tens of thousands of tips we received from the public. Following these digital and physical footprints, we were able to identify hundreds of people.” {link} The targeting operation needs context.

    Do you remember on April 27th when DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz recently said, “more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020 and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government.”  The result was “more than 1 million searches of private documents and communication of Americans that were illegal and non-compliant,” and over “10,000 federal employees have access to that database.” {OIG Testimony}.

    Put the statement from Garland together with the statement from Horowitz, and you get an understanding of what was done.

    Hundreds of stakeholders in the Lawfare network joined forces with hundreds of people who became staff researchers for a weaponized Congress.  Hundreds more social media background agents then poured thousands of hours into feeding private information to the DOJ, FBI, J6 Committee and all of their hired staff working on the project.

    How do I know?

    I was one of their targets.

    Before telling the rest of the story, some background is needed.

    I am well versed in the ways of the administrative state and the corrupt systems, institutions and silos that make up our weaponized government. I can (a) see them; (b) predict their activity; and (c) know where their traps and operations are located.

    Traveling the deep investigative weeds of the administrative state eventually gives you a set of skills.  When people ask how the outlines on this website can seem so far ahead of the sunlight that eventually falls upon the outlined corruption, this is essentially why.  When you take these skills on the road, you learn to be a free-range scout, and after a long while you learn how to track the activity.

    When I was outlining how the Fourth Branch of Government works and/or Jack’s Magic Coffee Shop and the DHS system operating inside it, I wasn’t shooting from the hip. However, people will always seek to dismiss the uncomfortable truth.

    Sometimes you just have to wait for the evidence you know exists to surface, or for a situation to unfold that is driven by a self-fulfilling prophecy. The bizarre CTH predictions turn out to be the truth of the issue because they are based on the factual evidence of the issue.

    That level of how the system works came in very handy when I received this subpoena from Chairman Bennie Thompson and the J6 Committee.  Warning, things are about to get very uncomfortable if you don’t accept the scale of corruption that exists.

    Pay attention to the red box on the page shown. This is essentially the probable cause that justifies the subpoena itself.  I have redacted a name in the box for reasons you will see that follow.

    I was never in Washington DC on January 6, 2021, nor did I work with or communicate with anyone who was involved in any of the activities that are subject to the J6 committee investigative authority.

    I’m going to skip a lot of background noise, irrelevant legal stuff, jurisdictional issues, discoveries from discussions with lawyers and the experience gained in association with this ridiculous subpoena.  I am going to focus on the biggest story within it.

    Sticking to the information in the Red Box above, notice how the J6 committee has evidence, “public-source information and documents on file”, showing my participation, communication, and contact with people and technology that are material interests to the committee.

    Here’s the kicker…. I had no clue what the hell they were talking about.  There’s not a single aspect of their outline that I had any knowledge or connection of.

    I had no idea what Zello was. I had no idea who 1% watchdog might be. I had never heard of “Stop the Steal J6” or associated “channel.”  I had never heard of the person redacted, and I had never communicated with any Oath Keeper, any communication system, or platform, or anyone or anything – nothing – that is outlined in that subpoena.

    Those points of evidence outlined in the subpoena had no connection to me at all.

    The subpoena might as well have been asking me to appear in Michigan because my Red Ferrari was involved in a hit and run accident, during my trip to Detroit.  I don’t own a Ferrari; I have never been to Michigan; I certainly never had an accident; I wasn’t on a trip and have never visited Detroit.  The entire construct of their probable cause for the subpoena was silly. Complete and utter nonsense.

    That said, how could there be “public records” and “documentary” evidence of something that never happened?

    At first, I thought this was some silly case of mistaken identity and they just sent a subpoena to the wrong person.  However, the investigators were adamant the evidence existed, and the need for testimony was required.

    After taking advice from several smart people, and after discovering the costs associated with just the reply to the committee and/or representation therein; suddenly I realized there might be more value for me in this subpoena than the committee.  After all, how can there be public-records and documents that I own a red Ferrari and went to Michigan when I don’t and never did.

    After several back and forths I discovered, through their admissions of their own research, and through documents they extracted as an outcome of their tasks to prove the merit of their claims, that someone *inside* Twitter had created a fictitious identity of me associated with the networks and communications as the investigators described them.

    Think about what was discovered here.

    Someone inside the Twitter platform, an employee of Twitter, had made a decision to target me. As a result: (a) they had been doing this for a long time with a specific goal in mind; and (b) they created an elaborate trail of background activity and identity that was entirely fabricated.

    Eventually, my assigned investigative unit admitted this.

    Once, the federal investigators realized what took place they wanted to get rid of me -and my snark filled curiosity- with great urgency.

    They also had an ‘oh shit’ moment, when they contemplated everything, including what they had revealed to me from the outset of my contact, now several months prior.

    What I discovered in this experience was that DHS, and by extension DOJ/FBI and the January 6 investigators, had direct administrative level backdoors into all social media platforms.

    Overlay the Twitter files now, and then expand your thinking….

    In their quest to prove that I owned a Red Ferrari, traveled to Michigan and had a hit-and-run accident, these investigators outlined to me how the United States Government, through their DHS authority, has employees, agents and contractors with open portals into all social media platforms.

    Yes, the federal government is inside the mechanics of the systems (Twitter, Facebook, Meta, Instagram, Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, Zello, etc) and they have administrative access in real time to monitor, review, extract and evaluate everything, soup-to-nuts.

    It was only because the investigators and forensic data knuckleheads have these portals, that they were able to locate the source of the fabricated evidence they were originally attributing to me.  This was an investigative process and research discovery being conducted in the data processing systems of Twitter in real time as they questioned me.

    Once they realized what had taken place, and as soon as I started asking how they were making these admissions (now carrying an apologetic certainty), suddenly the investigators wanted no further contact or communication with me.  You’re good, whoopsie daisy, our bad, sorry.

    Now, take some time to fully digest and absorb what I have just shared.

    The U.S. government is worried about TikTok, because U.S. citizen data might be extracted?

    Meanwhile, the U.S. government, at a fully unrestricted administrative level, is inside Twitter, Facebook, Meta, Insta, YouTube etc., running amok and extracting anything – including private messages… and they’re somehow worried about protecting us from TikTok data collection.  Think about it.

    Provide your thoughts in the comments and I will try to fill in any blanks or questions you might carry.  In the interim, live your best life.

    Ears of an elephant, eyes of a mouse.

    via The Last Refuge

    May 5, 2023 at 07:19AM

  • Biden’s Incompetent Secretary of Interior Says She is Unaware China Controls Critical Minerals Needed for Electric Vehicles

    Biden’s Incompetent Secretary of Interior Says She is Unaware China Controls Critical Minerals Needed for Electric Vehicles

    May 2, 2023 at 04:29PM    Biden’s Incompetent Secretary of Interior Says She is Unaware China Controls Critical Minerals Needed for Electric Vehicles (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    Joe Biden’s incompetent Secretary of Interior Deb Haaland on Tuesday said she was completely unaware China controls the critical minerals needed for the electric vehicles.

    The Biden Regime is FORCING electric vehicles on the American people and China controls the critical minerals needed for the car batteries.

    Secretary Haaland is clueless.

    Deb Haaland was not chosen to be Biden’s Interior Secretary because she’s qualified for the job.

    She checked a box: First Native American cabinet secretary.

    And this is the result…

    Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Tuesday asked Secretary Haaland if she knew what nation was the largest producer of cobalt, lithium and natural graphite.

    “Now, can you tell me what nation is the largest producer of refined lithium in the world?” Hawley asked Haaland.

    “No, I can’t,” she replied.

    “It’s China,” Hawley said. “Can you tell me what nation is the largest producer of refined cobalt in the world?”

    “No, Senator,” she said.

    “It’s China!” Hawley said. “Do you know what nation is the largest exporter of natural graphite to the United States globally?”

    “No, Senator,” Haaland said again.

    “It’s China!” Hawley said.

    Hawley pointed at that the Biden Regime is simultaneously blocking the mining of critical minerals in the US and making us dependent on China.

    WATCH:

    via The Gateway Pundit https://ift.tt/XoSNu6M

  • AMERICAN HERO!  Boy Smacks Down School Board For Telling Him He Can’t Wear ‘There Are Only 2 Genders’ Shirt

    AMERICAN HERO! Boy Smacks Down School Board For Telling Him He Can’t Wear ‘There Are Only 2 Genders’ Shirt

    May 2, 2023 at 07:21AM   Video: Boy Smacks Down School Board For Telling Him He Can’t Wear ‘There Are Only 2 Genders’ Shirt

    A 12 year old boy in Middleborough Massachusetts gave his school board a lesson in Constitutional rights after he was told that he was not allowed to wear a t-shirt emblazoned with the statement ‘There are only 2 genders’.

    Liam Morrison, a seventh-grader at Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, noted that he was removed from gym class on March 21 by school staff who claimed that the statement on his shirt was “making some students feel unsafe.”

    The teachers told Morrison that he would have to remove the shirt if he wanted to return to class, and he refused.

    Brave Liam related his story to school officials and defiantly defended his First Amendment right to express himself:

    Liam noted that he was also told that the shirt was “targeting a protected class,” to which he asked “who is this protected class and are their feelings more important than my rights?”

    “I don’t complain when I see pride flags and diversity posters hung throughout this school,” he continued, adding “because others have a right to their beliefs just as I do.”

    “Not one person, staff or student, told me they were bothered with what I was wearing, in fact just the opposite, several kids told me they supported what I was doing and they wanted one too,” he added.

    Liam also called out the double standards of school officials, noting that he was told his shirt was ‘disrupting’. “I experience disruptions to my learning every day, kids acting out in class are a disruption and nothing is done. Why are the rules applied to one but not another?” He asked.

    “I know that I have a right to wear a shirt with those five words, at 12-years-old I have my own opinions, and have a right to express those opinions. Even at school, this right is called the first amendment to the constitution,” Liam told the board officials.

    “I have learned a lot from this experience. I learned that a lot of other students share my view. I learned that adults don’t always do the right thing or make the right decisions,” Liam concluded.

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

    via Infowars https://ift.tt/Hytmeoq

  • Federal Agent Whistleblowers Issue Red Alert! U.S. Air Marshals Being Diverted From National Security Threats  & Tasked With Targeting Innocent Americans

    Federal Agent Whistleblowers Issue Red Alert! U.S. Air Marshals Being Diverted From National Security Threats & Tasked With Targeting Innocent Americans

    On Friday April 28, 2023, Sonya Hightower-LaBosco Executive Director of the Air Marshal National Council joined Investigative Journalist & Syndicated Talk Show Host Pete Santilli to discuss a very urgent national security matter brought forward by Federal Agent whistleblowers from the U.S. Air Marshals.

    U.S. Air Marshals are an elite group of law enforcement officers who provide a crucial service to the nation. They are heavily armed and trained to protect people onboard commercial flights from terrorist attacks and other criminal activity. Air Marshals are also trained to observe and detect suspicious activity and behaviors onboard flights, as well as to be able to respond quickly and effectively in the event of a security breach or other emergency. Air Marshals are also responsible for educating other crew members on relevant security protocols and procedures. While their work is often unseen, Air Marshals provide an invaluable service to the nation and ensure that travelers can feel safe and secure when they fly.

    After the January 6th rally in Washington, DC, U.S. Marshals discovered that the Department of Homeland Security’s Transportation Security Administration (TSA) maintains a database of all airline passengers who have been designated as “domestic terrorists” if they traveled to DC on or around January 6th. Whistleblowers within the U.S. Air Marshals have expressed concerns that the TSA has not only arbitrarily miscategorized Americans as domestic terrorists simply for traveling to DC, but all designation profiles accuse everyone on the list of entering the U.S. Capitol on January 6th.

    Documentary evidence provided exclusively to The Pete Santilli Show & The Big Mig Podcast indicate U.S. Air Marshals discovered the TSA’s database contained dozens of names of “on duty FAMS, Congressional members, and other armed LEOS”. The database “was shared with three different FBI units, the Domestic Terrorism Operations Section (DTOS), Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), and the National Joint Terrorism Task Force (NJTTF)” and if the list was injested by the FBI “… then every on duty FAM that flew during that time frame would then be attached to the FBI case. This could set off SMC coverage for FAMS flying in the future.” Special Mission Coverage (SMC) is the intelligence-driven, risk-based deployment of Federal Air Marshals (FAMs) on flights when individuals have been identified as posing a higher risk to security “In other words the agency may actually have FAMs watching other FAMs that are flying on duty.”

    During the interview, Lobasco said, “…the federal air marshals are disgusted with the details of what they’re being told to deploy on. They don’t feel right about surveilling children, surveilling military veterans who lost their legs in Afghanistan, surveilling grandmothers, grandfathers, unaccompanied minors. This was not the job that we were brought over to do after nine eleven. We have gotten so far off of our original mission. It’s almost unrecognizable now what we’re doing on a daily basis versus what we should be doing, looking for the real bad guys that are trying to take down aircraft and make those a weapon of mass destruction. We’re not doing that anymore.

    Potential whistleblowers are encouraged to contact Sonya Lobasco at (800) 864-6122 or send an email to: info [at] airmarshalnc.com

    During the interview, Ms. Lobasco and Pete Santilli discussed the urgency of informing the public about these potential lapses in judgement by the security & intelligence apparatus which is structured to “get bad guys”. The obvious implication is that when Federal Air Marshal resources are diverted from getting the real bad guys to pursue innocent political opponents, a disaster is waiting to happen. Pete Santilli went so far to speculate that the lapse in judgment may potentially be deliberate & intentional, especially when considering recent revelations that the hijackers on 9/11 may have been CIA agents, and some of whom were allowed entry into the United States by Jedda Saudi Arabia’s then CIA Station Chief John Brennan. (See ABC news report: State Dept. Lapses Aided 9/11 Hijackers )

    Based on what we’ve learned about how domestic and foreign bad actors perpetrated 9-11, one must assume that these potential lapses in judgement may be a deliberate and intentional exploitation of our vulnerabilities.