Ed Henry: “FOX was Trying to Off Trump on Election Night. I Saw That!” (VIDEO)
Former FOX News host and White House correspondent Ed Henry joined Steve Bannon this morning on The War Room at CPAC Texas. Ed Henry is a morning host on Real America’s Voice network. Ed Henry: At Real America’s Voice I got a new perspective on things. I was off the field for a little while.…
Dick Cheney: “In Our Nation’s 246 Year History There Has Never Been an Individual Who Is Greater Threat to Republic than Donald Trump” (VIDEO)
The rotten apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Dick Cheney stepped out from behind the curtain on Thursday to cut a campaign ad for his baby girl Liz Cheney.
Dick Cheney is famous for lying to the American public about WMDs in Iraq and Iraqi connections to 9-11 which led to the Iraq War. This destructive debacle killed thousands of American soldiers, injured thousands more, and killed tens of thousands of Iraqis.
The war also cost the US treasury trillions of dollars.
“In our nation’s 246 year history there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our Republic than Donald Trump.” Dick Cheney pic.twitter.com/erBPBNy8ah
August 3, 2022 at 04:51PM FBI Training Materials Designate Gadsden Flag and Historic American Symbols as Evidence of Militia Violent Extremists – The Last Refuge
Project Veritas has obtained whistleblower materials from official FBI training and instruction, highlighting images that are defined as evidence of Militia Violent Extremists or MVE’s. Among the material now identified by the FBI as extreme are pictures of the Gadsden flag, Betsy Ross flag, Patriot symbols, Molon Labe and a host of other historic images that are now defined as evidence of Militia Violent Extremism.
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Aug. 2, 2022] Project Veritas released a newly leaked document today provided by an FBI whistleblower, which shows how the Bureau classifies American citizens it deems to be potential “Militia Violent Extremists” [MVEs].
In the document, the FBI cites symbols, images, phrases, events, and individuals that agents should look out for when identifying alleged domestic terrorists.
The “Unclassified/Law Enforcement Sensitive” document says it is for “FBI Internal Use Only.”
Of note, under the “Symbols” section, is a prominent citation of the Second Amendment, where it explains that “MVEs justify their existence with the Second Amendment, due to the mention of a ‘well regulated Militia,’ as well as the right to bear arms.”
Right below that, under the “Commonly Referenced Historical Imagery and Quotes” section, Revolutionary War images such as the Gadsden Flag and the Betsy Ross Flag are listed. Each flag displayed in the document comes with a brief description of what it means.
Under the “Common Phrases and References” section of the leaked document, Ashli Babbitt is cited as a person that MVEs consider to be a Martyr.
The same document also refers to Ruby Ridge, Waco, and even Timothy McVeigh, tying in traditional American ideas and symbols with radical and/or violent events in the past. (see and read more)
FBI Director Chris Wray is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday [SEE HERE], perhaps someone will ask him about this.
It would appear, if we are to accept the narrative from the FBI, patriotic Americans are all dissidents now.
August 3, 2022 at 06:53AM Trump leads Pence: Kari Lake overtakes Karrin Taylor Robson in AZ primary
Kari Lake has overtaken Karrin Taylor Robson in the fiercely contested Arizona GOP primary for governor, with more than three-quarters of the votes declared.
As of 1 a.m. on Wednesday (Mountain Standard Time), Lake was narrowly ahead of Robson by 45.4 to 45.1 percentage points, with 76 percent of votes accounted for, according to The New York Times live tracker.
Lake went into the lead early on Wednesday, having being trailing for much of the time since the polls opened on Tuesday, August 2. She was behind by nine points at around the midway stage of the count.
It appears that Lake managed to chip away at the deficit as polling place votes were tallied. Mail-in ballots were widely expected to favor Robson.
Lake was predicted to win in a number of surveys prior to the vote, with some polls giving her double-digit point lead over Robson.
Voters in Arizona are choosing between the Donald Trump-backed Kari Lake (L) and the Mike Pence-endorsed Karrin Taylor Robson for the GOP nomination for governor. Lake is leading with more than three-quarters of the votes declared.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
The GOP gubernatorial election has attracted national attention as the two main candidates are seen as representing opposing sides of the Republican Party’s potential future.
Pence’s relationship with Trump fell apart in the wake of the January 6 attack after the former president blamed him for not stopping the certification of the 2020 election results during his role as presiding officer of the Senate, despite Pence not having the authority to do so.
Trump has also frequently attacked Ducey for refusing to overturn Arizona’s 2020 election outcome.
As a result, the GOP primary for governor in Arizona has the subplot of being the center of a proxy war between Trump and Pence—with both men reportedly considering a 2024 run for president. It may also give an indication of whether Republican voters are ready to move on from 2020.
Even Robson has expressed some doubt about the results of the last election, describing them as “absolutely not fair” during a live televised debate, but she stopped short of saying it had been stolen.
By comparison, Lake, a former TV news anchor, has long supported claims that the last election was rigged, and she was already talking about cheating in the case of a defeat in her own election.
“If we don’t win, there’s some cheating going on,” Lake told The New York Times when she was trailing on Tuesday night.
Taking a leaf straight out of Trump’s playbook, Lake also told a crowd of her supporters in Scottsdale that she had already won the election, even though there are still a large number of votes to be declared.
“We won today seven-out-of-10 Election Day votes. Those votes are not counted yet,” Lake said, via KTAR. “There is no path to victory for my opponent and we won this race. Period.”
The winner of the GOP nomination for governor will go on to face Democrat Katie Hobbs in November’s midterms. She is projected to win her primary, with a comprehensive lead over second placed Marco Lopez.
August 2, 2022 at 04:44PM WHAT?! “Anyone Questioning, Challenging, PHOTOGRAPHING, Or RECORDING At Polling Places May Violate Federal Voting Rights Law” – Undercover Sheriff’s Deputies & Federal Thugs To Watch Arizona Primary Election For “Voter Intimidation” As Election Fraud Concerns Continue
The Maricopa County Sheriff’s office and the Biden Justice Department are watching conservatives on Arizona’s Election Day, allegedly to ensure the safety of voters.
Patriots independently investigating voter irregularities, ballot trafficking, and outright fraud will be scrutinized for “interfering with the right to vote peacefully.”
“Anyone questioning, challenging, photographing, or recording at polling places under the pretext that they’re uncovering illegal voting may violate federal voting rights law,” reported KTAR.
Are they taking these measures anywhere else in the country?
The Justice Department has assigned a prosecutor to take complaints and respond to any possible voting-rights abuses in Arizona’s Tuesday Primary. They will partner with the corrupt Soros-funded Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone to crack down on Republicans.
Penzone previously begged the Arizona Senate to stop auditing the Stolen 2020 Election, and he refused to comply with auditors. He will use his office to steal another election.
The Gateway Pundit already reported on the egregious election day “irregularities” that Patriots are seeing at the polls this morning.
PHOENIX – The Justice Department has assigned a federal prosecutor to respond to potential voting-rights complaints and violations in Arizona for Tuesday’s primary election.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Lokey will serve as the election officer for the federal bureau’s Arizona district in Phoenix. He will also consult with the Justice Department on any instances of election fraud and voter intimidation, the agency said.
“This is the first time we’ve done this before the primary election,” U.S. Attorney Gary Restaino told KTAR News 92.3 FM on Friday.
“Just to try and set the tone that the federal government is partnering with state and local officials.
Lokey will be available by phone Tuesday at 602-514-7516.
Federal law protects against such crimes as intimidating or bribing voters, buying and selling votes, impersonating voters, altering vote tallies, stuffing ballot boxes and marking ballots for voters against their wishes.
The department said that anyone questioning, challenging, photographing, or recording at polling places under the pretext that they’re uncovering illegal voting may violate federal voting rights law.
Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone told KTAR News 92.3 FM’s Arizona’s Morning News in early June that his office would have “zero tolerance” for voting day disrupters and that plainclothes deputies will be checking polling places.
The FBI said special agents from the Phoenix office will also be taking reports on election day abuses at 623-466-1999 or online at https://tips.fbi.gov.
They will not even allow us to record or photograph illegal voting! This is clearly meant to stop anybody from busting the illegal ballot harvesting or trafficking discovered in Dinesh D’Souza’s “2000 Mules” documentary.
U.S. Attorney Gary Restaino, the top federal prosecutor in Arizona, was appointed by Joe Biden last October for this purpose.
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Deputies will also be in plainclothes, “watching for any issues that could interfere with the right to vote peacefully.” Penzone told KTAR that he will have “zero tolerance” for Patriots who want to ensure a free and fair election.
Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone expects to have a more robust law enforcement presence than usual on election day, but many will be plainclothes deputies watching for any issues that could interfere with the right to vote peacefully.
“If you’re at a polling place, you can pretty much work under the premise that there’s a plainclothes deputy not too far away keeping an eye on things, so you can come and feel safe,” he said.
The move comes after tensions following the 2020 election and not because of any specific threat.
Imagine that!
They’re using law enforcement to intimidate conservative voters under the guise of protecting the right to vote peacefully.
And this move comes after “tensions,” not the massive law violations or hundreds of thousands of illegal or questionable ballots that were discovered in the 2020 Election.
Right…
All Patriots need to get out and vote and pay attention to what they’re doing.
August 1, 2022 at 04:24PM LEAKED TO ROLLING STONES: Trump’s Lawyers Are Preparing Legal Defenses Against Criminal Charges
Donald Trump’s lawyers are preemptively preparing a legal defense against criminal charges from the Justice Department, as the former president’s lawyers are increasingly anxious that their client will be prosecuted for his role in the attempt to overturn the 2020 election.
Members of the ex-president’s legal team have already begun brainstorming strategy and potential defenses, according to three people familiar with the matter and written communications reviewed by Rolling Stone. Trump himself has been briefed on potential legal defenses on at least two occasions this summer, two of the sources say.
That effort intensified after former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s June testimony before the House committee investigating Jan. 6.
“Members of the Trump legal team are quietly preparing, in the event charges are brought,” says one person familiar with the situation. “It would be career malpractice not to. Do the [former] president’s attorneys believe everything Cassidy said? No. … Do they think the Department of Justice would be wise to charge him? No. But we’ve gotten to a point where if you don’t think criminal charges are at least somewhat likely, you are not serving the [former] president’s best interests.”
The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Official Trump representatives did not respond to requests for comment on this story.
In their preparations, Trump’s team has discussed strategies that involve shifting blame from Trump to his advisers for the efforts to overturn the election, per the three sources, reflecting a broader push to find a fall guy — or fall guys. “Trump got some terrible advice from attorneys who, some people would argue, should have or must have known better,” says one of the sources with knowledge of recent discussions in Trumpland. “An ‘advice of counsel’ defense would be a big one.”
Other potential strategies include defenses based on the First Amendment and the right to petition the government over a political grievance. Such arguments are viewed internally as potential defenses against charges related to the “fake elector” scheme.
Federal prosecutors have questioned aides to former Vice President Mike Pence about Trump’s involvement in his campaign’s effort to put forth slates of those fake electors, The Washington Postreported last week. After Trump lost the election in November, his campaign and supporters recruited the fake electors to proclaim Trump to be the recipient of their state’s electoral college votes. The effort aimed to provide an air of legal legitimacy to Trump’s election-fraud conspiracy theories, as well as to pressure officials in battleground states to declare him the winner. The effort failed, but it has since attracted the attention of prosecutors, not just at the Justice Department, but in the swing states where Republicans assembled slates of phony electors.
If the Justice Department does come with charges, Trump’s current team has acknowledged they would have to bring on more legal firepower to handle the historic legal defense. “You’d need to have a real heavyweight at the top [of the legal team] for something like that, but right now nobody knows who that would be,” one Trump adviser says.
Some of Trump’s higher-ranking legal and political counselors doubt Attorney General Merrick Garland would be willing to go through with charges. Biden’s pick for attorney general has been long regarded as a consummate institutionalist, wary of the unintended consequences or precedents that could come from criminally charging a former president.
“I do think criminal prosecutions are possible. Whether they are advisable is a more difficult consideration for the country,” Ty Cobb, a former top lawyer in Trump’s White House, toldRolling Stone in June. “Possible for Trump and [Mark] Meadows certainly. And for the others, including lawyers, who engaged fraudulently in formal proceedings or investigations.”
Criminal charges against a former president would mark the first time in American history that a former president has been prosecuted for crimes committed in office. A Nixon-era Justice Department memo, reiterated during the Clinton presidency, stated that presidents should not be charged while in office. But how the prosecution of a former president could take place legally remains unclear, given the lack of precedent, and would invite constitutional challenges ending up at the Supreme Court.
Trump also seems keenly aware of the blowback that could result from a federal indictment — and is telling supporters it could be politically advantageous. Early this year, the former president told fans at a Texas rally that if prosecutors go after him, “we are going to have in this country the biggest protest we have ever had … in Washington, D.C., in New York, in Atlanta, and elsewhere.”
Trump has repeated versions of that line to confidants and longtime pals, including at casual gatherings this summer, a person with direct knowledge of the matter says. “He says,” the source recalls, “it would make the crowd size at [Jan. 6] look small by comparison.”
August 1, 2022 at 07:01AM MUST SEE: GOP Rep. Dan Bishop DESTROYS DOJ Hack for Setting Up Lower Income White Men in Contrived and Paid For Fake Whitmer Plot (VIDEO)
In October 2020 press conference, the FBI announced it thwarted a plot by a so-called “right-wing militia” to kidnap and kill Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and overthrow the state government. The announcement was made purposely right before the 2020 election.
The Whitmer kidnapping plot was in the media 24/7 and used to bludgeon Trump with just a few weeks to go until Election Day.
The FBI used at least 12 informants in the Michigan Whitmer kidnapping case.
There were 6 defendants and 12 FBI informants identified as the case progressed.
The FBI planned the Whitmer attack, organized the attack, paid for the attack, and recruited local men to join in their planned attack.
It was another complete setup by Chris Wray’s FBI to frame and ruin innocent men.
The case, which we now know was comprised of virtually all FBI agents and informants, took another devastating hit in August.
Michael Hills, an attorney for Brandon Caserta, one of the six defendants, produced text messages showing an FBI field agent telling an informant to lie, frame an innocent man and delete text messages.
This is why federal prosecutors are refusing to hand over text messages and laptops from FBI informants in the Whitmer kidnapping case. The FBI actually hatched the plot. paid for the plot, ran the plot, and set up the innocent men in their immoral scheme.
Two men were found guilty in the FBI’s made-up kidnapping case in Michigan and two men were released due to a hung jury back in April.
Now the two men released by the hung jury are back in court.
Defendants Adam Fox and Barry Croft are facing trial for the second time.
The Stasi FBI will keep going after these innocent men until they get a guilty verdict.
It’s how the FBI rolls.
Just before the 2020 election, the FBI announced it had thwarted an alleged plot to kidnap the Michigan governor.
A jury found that the FBI had actually entrapped at least 2 of the defendants.
Is this how the DOJ carries out its operations? The American people deserve to know. pic.twitter.com/ZcjGtwKWtC
Finally — this past week a Republican lawmaker confronted the DOJ on their dirty tricks in the contrived Whitmer case.
Dan Bishop questioned Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen on the FBI’s illegal operation against innocent Americans.
Rep. Dan Bishop: “The FBI appears to have contrived the plot, used its informants to drive people into the plot, and provide logistical and financial support into what was in effect an FBI operation.”
August will be the moment of truth for our country, according to Pete Santilli. The long-time Conservative pundit and broadcaster has a bird’s eye view of emerging election details from experts- converging with known points of data about election corruption- just as they are coming together and about to explode on the election integrity front.
“When there is no transparency, they can do anything they want,” Jeff O’Donnell, the CIO of Ordros Analytics, said recently to Santilli.
Santilli published the following interview just when readers may have thought the discussion about the 2020 election could provide no path forward for American patriots. Santilli says we are about to level up into a whole new arena on the push to exterminate the underhanded vote tabulation machines that have plagued our nation- once and for all.
A coding expert, O’ Donnell, is one of the numerous determined Americans who is giving new hope to America that with the will of the rest of the American people, citizens can, in fact, demand a less expensive- hand counting- tabulation process for elections.
WATCH THE O’DONNELL INTERVIEW:
Santilli and O’Donnell made the case that American citizens actually have the duty- to join other courageous Americans in demanding paper ballots and a tabulation system of hand counting.
They call other Americans to make a stand alongside one Gold Star Mother, whose actions in the days after the 2020 election will become known as historically heroic.
In Colorado in 2020- that Mom, who refuses to give up her dead son’s promise to defend the socerginity of America, has roused the enemies of free and fair elections.
This month, we will hear her story about her commitment to placing her own life-now- on the line to merely have American votes honored with paper ballots and hand counting. And we will hear so much more.
Demanding paper ballots and hand-counting, “compared to other things that America has done in its prime is a minor, minor thing,” O’Donnell told Santilli in the monumental Santilli show interview.
But will the American people rise to the challenge?
That is all that is left unseen because at this point- with the assistance and heroic actions of Mike Lindell, American lawmakers have all the information we need to make the case that the vote tabulation machines are programmed to select our winners- that we are not actually electing our winners.
What we need now is for people to arise- and for lawmakers to care.
Santilli says that in the month of August, numerous important things are going to happen that will set this topic a blaze and which will bring this Santilli-O’Donnell interview into sharp focus.
And this isn’t ‘conspiracy theory’; Santilli, who is methodical in his own research, ‘brought the receipts’, meaning he provided the links and evidence to support his claims.
It is all there in the interview.
The details in this interview are paramount for all Americans to grasp and understand, as they provide the backdrop for what we are about to learn from other groups as new evidence comes pouring out.
O’Donnell told Santilli that he began his own election research after the 2021 Lindell Symposium in South Dakota and that he had been drawn to start his work by looking at what happened in the important state of Colorado, where Tina Peters-an elections clerk, who is a tenacious patriot and that Gold Star Mother mentioned above, began to emerge as an important figure in the fight to save the Republic.
Peters and what she did after the election with the election data from her Colorado precinct became essential points in O’Donnell’s research- because her data showed O’Donnell many suspicious things that he picked up on as a data analyst.
According to O’Donnell, in Colorado 2020, election workers were allowed to start tabulating vote totals in mid-Oct- weeks before the November election day; O’Donnell described to Santilli the disturbing details of his research into what happened in that state at the time of the election.
O’Donnell told Santilli that his research (link above) shows something shocking happened in the early hours of early voting in Colorado, and that is where Peters’s data showed some bizarre- and what he described as “some software algorithm in the machine woke up and decided to recount 20,000 ballots that had already been counted.”
And the counting process changed somehow, O’Donnell said.
“And there is the evidence in that report that when these ballots were recounted they were not counted the same and therein lies the whole problem. Well, problem number one is what happened is completely unauthorized, because the fact is that it happened without a clerk doing anything. I don’t care what anyone says this was not initiated by a human being sitting at the computer in the county,” O’Donnell said.
So it sounds as if there is programming or coding that caused that. But how could that be? Is there any proof that has happened before?
“The fact that the machine had the ability on its own to do a reprocessing of the ballots is insane. There’s also evidence that votes were changed when that happened. Dominion and the Colorado Secretary of State sent people around a few months after the election to install a new process they called trusted build. Uh, paging George Orwell,” O’Donnell said.
And the Orwellian nature of the machine people got even more complex. Peters, who said it was her job as an election clerk to make a copy of the election data before sending disks to be wiped clean, was arrested for making a copy of the six disks of election data information before turning the disks over to the machine company.
Peters was arrested because the data belonged to the machine company, not the office she held representing the people.
Who made those laws?
“The trust build would have destroyed every single bit of evidence that showed what happened. In other words, if Tina Peters had not gotten that image before Dominion and the Colorado Secretary State representatives had basically wiped it clean to do the new update. Then I wouldn’t be here we wouldn’t the best evidence,” O’Donnell said.
IMPORTANT: Peters is such a pivotal character in the election integrity story that an unforgettable documentary titled Selection Code, with Lara Logan, will be released this August. Look for O’Donnell’s cameo in this film- along with a discussion about some of the other information that Santilli highlights in the O’Donnell interview.
Santilli, who has studied as many of the 2020 election details he could alongside Mike Lindell and the team at Frank Speech, and who has a background in coding from his days in the US Military, said that O’Donnell’s testimony and research about the elections codes are ‘unimpeachable,’ so this is an interview people will want to revisit.
IMPORTANT: (53:56) In the interview, Santilli brought up a number of points that O’Donnell agreed with him on, that Santilli said are also important to understand. One is that the source code and programming of election machines began as an idea – of the Republicans. And when the Democrats found out, they were aghast about it. The question is, what changed them into accepting the voter machine corruption?
Santilli explains:
“About the source code. I heard the testimony that Republicans designed this very devious scheme of putting the source coding in there. Clinton Curtis testified to it, and he did so on behalf of the Republicans, Tom Feeney. Curtis said it was rigging elections and went to the Democrats and they went to the media and railed about it. And when they figured out how the rigging was done, they adopted it. And they said, we’ll own that rigging. And they basically just took ownership of it.”
This is the interview Santilli was talking about:
IMPORTANT: The O’Donnell research shows us the machine was pre-programmed to switch votes, except a problem for them was the massive support for President Donald J. Trump, which forced the Democrat’s hand into brazen theft and noticeable corrupt activity. At (33:45) of the interview, Santilli also contributed his own graphic to the O’Donnell interview, which O’Donnell was impressed with; which explains the process of how machines count the votes:
“I designed this thing so that everybody could understand it. As I understand it, the pink block up here, software source code is designed to calculate 51 to 49% plus delete the forensic evidence right up here. The next column says machine count, we got 49,000 Trump votes, 51,000, you know, Biden votes. The actual ballot count is 49,000 Trump votes, but only 7,000 Biden, actual votes scan to that machine. Adjudication can help offset some of that. You could delete some of the Trump votes, make those go away, right. Maybe so that you don’t have to pull as many ballots out of the warehouse and maybe add 10,000 more,” Santilli said.
This is his graphic in which he talks about:
IMPORTANT: Other countries have detected that their election machines are problematic and have even passed laws to demand transparency after having issues with the machine companies. At (11:36) Santilli introduced the following clips into the interview to make the case that the Philippines are ahead of the United States of America.
So why are we behind? Santilli talks about it. “The Philippines are well ahead of the curve. We need to find out what they discovered in 2016, Kalik exposed this. They, they did not, they set up transparency servers, they had access to the source code,” Santilli said.
The manipulation of Smartmatic was known:
All of these important details are essential to understand as the heat rises on election theft in August 2022. By the time the summer has come to end and the real work of the mid-term election goes into high gear, Santilli says even more things will happen that should ignite a movement of Americans to demand a better way of counting the ballots in elections.
Other events that are about to occur, according to Santilli, is a private event called- The Pit- and something that AZ Rep. Mark Finchem, who is also AZ Secretary of State candidate, told Santilli was a “20 megaton Bomb,” which he described as evidence of prosecutable crimes related to the Nov. 2020 election.
There is no doubt that explosions are about to happen with a multi-pronged attack on voter fraud in August.
According to Right Side Broadcasting: “True the Vote’s election intelligence specialist Gregg Phillips revealed during an interview this week on GraceTime TV that the group would release more evidence of election fraud in just a few weeks.
In cohesion with True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, Phillips will present “devastating” information and evidence to a select group of invitees during an event called “The Pit.”
And it all comes just in time for Mike Lindell, the founder of My Pillow, to have another Summit, similar to the one that inspired O’Donnell in the first place.
One can only wonder what will come out of the actions of determined patriots this summer. Stay tuned to the Pete Santilli show to find out.
If after listening to Peters, who lost her son in the service to America- talk about pouring out her blood to restore elections- doesn’t stir the consciousness of men and women in this country, then we may never have deserved the hope that was handed to us by our Founding Fathers in the first place.
Will America get the election transparency we deserve as our birthright in a beautiful and free Republic? Most likely, the answer is that it depends upon how many of us demand transparency of our civil servants and their machines.
Lindell and his teams are about to uncover the Moment of Truth when we will find out what we are really made up of- in the United States of America. Happy August- America.
Important Disclaimer: This is an opinion piece, yet a very well-informed opinion. it is not intended to harm, but to inform the public of this matter of high importance.
Recently “sealed” documents have been released which confirm what I suspected — in part — that Brandon Straka’s cooperation with federal authorities is potentially damaging to individuals by voluntarily providing information to the FBI & DOJ which the government considers “substantial”.
The newly unsealed filings do include a list of people Brandon Straka provided the DOJ with information about, including several "Stop the Steal" organizers and various right-wing social media personalities. pic.twitter.com/wslWAKI5Gz
— ?? Damien Jarrett ?? (@WalkAwayDamo) July 31, 2022
After hearing Brandon Straka’s Twitter “SPACES” audio presentation on Sunday July 31, 2022; based on my extensive experience dealing with the Department of Justice’s malicious tactics in building conspiracy cases, I feel compelled to inform the public (especially the individuals Straka has potentially implicated) about some very important concerns I now have:
Brandon Straka is a “mark”. Straka may have innocently, ignorantly, and now apparently naively cooperated with the government as part of his plea agreement. Based on the information I’ve collected and analyzed from his own legal case filing, in addition to his recent public pronouncements regarding document leaks, I can honestly say that Brandon Straka is way over his skies against a very formidable adversary. In my well-informed opinion, he’s clearly a victim of lawfare being perpetrated by the DOJ, and in street-lingo, he can best be categorized as a “mark” who was easy prey to help the DOJ without him even knowing it.
America-First/Conservatives are equally clueless and naive about who they are up against. There’s a reason why Trump supporters, and conservatives in general, get their tails kicked — because their adversary is brilliant, strategic, covert, devious, and malicious. Most importantly, they’ve spent decades deeply infiltrating every institution of our government & politics, and in this late stage of completing their marxist overthrow of our Republic, their strongest work-horses doing the heaviest lifting….are the conservatives.
Brandon Straka insists that he cooperated with the government, but everyone needs to understand that, in his own opinion, was innocent and harmless. He’s proudly proclaimed that although he spoke to the government, he ultimately told the government that he never witnessed anyone break the law. Straka’s comments indicate he is obviously — if not dangerously — clueless about how the government builds a conspiracy case. While he insists he helped individuals with his cooperation, he is clueless about how his testimony may have assisted the government “substantially” in building conspiracy charges against others.
Brandon Straka insists that the sealed documents must remain sealed because they contain sensitive information such as his home address. This is a major red flag, especially since the court is in the process of determining redactions before they are publicly released. In the spirit of full transparency, Straka should be insisting that all sealed documents be released after his home address is redacted.
Each individual identified in Straka’s sealed documents, as well as the information he provided about them should have access to that information for their defense. Essentially, Straka is insisting on protecting himself at the expense of each individual who may be in legal jeopardy as a result of his testimony.
If Brandon Straka has nothing to hide, and the information he provided regarding other individuals targeted by the DOJ was harmless, then why is he opposing unsealing the documents?
The primary reason why I am advocating for full release (with sensitive information such as home addresses redacted), is because the people he has given testimony about deserve to have that information provided to their attorneys for their defense. This isn’t about Brandon Straka, this is about the people he has potentially harmed to save himself. It is a FACT that the government found Straka’s information so “substantial” that he received leniency and favor. These facts are in the official court record, unsealed and unredacted.
For some strange reason, many justifiably sympathetic influencers unjustifiably refuse to accept the reality that Brandon Straka spoke to the people complicit in overthrowing our Republic 3 times. They also avoid addressing the questions that could help other lessor-known Americans defend themselves. Their judgement may be clouded by Straka’s ability to fund raise, attract social media followers, as well as their own self interest in selling books or pushing fund raising campaigns to his followers. I’m certainly not against fund raising or campaigning for financial support of the Jan 6 defendants, I’m just repulsed by those turning a blind eye to the questionable character of Brandon Straka, presently one of the least credible conduits for fund raising & follower-building.
For instance, so-called “Patriots” need to internalize the following fact: To save himself, Brandon Straka negotiated a plea agreement which included cooperating with the government on three occasions. We could argue whether or not it was justified, as he was fearful of going to jail, and we could also sympathize with Straka, that his character was too weak to withstand the overwhelming force of the government. Who is to blame for that scenario? The forceful overbearing government, or the weak character of Straka. 97% of Americans are too weak to withstand government force. This is a fact, as the government celebrates a 97% success rate in obtaining plea deals and convictions.
In my opinion, too many Americans are rallying in support of a known, admitted government cooperator. Even more alarming are the ones who turn a blind eye to asking important questions which Straka’s potential victims deserve answers. It is also my strong, well-informed opinion that most influencers are putting their own self interests before integrity and principle.
Since I published my original article 6 months ago, too many people have told me that I was harming Brandon, and that he has a huge following & tremendous talent to build his organization and following. Essentially, they’ve told me directly and indirectly that the benefits of covering up the details far out weigh the importance of learning the truth. Brandon represents huge fund raising and list-building potential, and therefore we need to keep the patriot cash register ringing.
Quite frankly, the Twitter “SPACE” was nauseating throughout the entire session. A group comprised of so-called leaders and influencers rallying to support a weakened, battered, and openly-homosexual hair dresser; pandering to christians by calling for prayers one moment, dropping F-bombs the next moment, introducing a porn-star boyfriend of a Jan 6’r who voluntarily pleaded guilty to receive a 60 day sentence; cussing one minute, giving “God Bless You’s” the next….it was actually confusing to understand what these people stand for. The Constitution? Biblical and Christian Principles? Sexual deviancy? Patriotism? Truth? Transparency in one breathe while calling for secret sealed documents in another? Making really good points 98% of the time while concealing 2% of the most important truth?
The entire session demonstrates the cluelessness of both Brandon Straka, as well as his supporters as to how the government builds conspiracy cases. Whereas the government had missing puzzle pieces that Brandon Straka was able to provide through his “cooperation”. He has no idea what they needed, or what they were looking for. To make my point, I will create a fictitious scenario to help illustrate the potential damage to other “unindicted co-conspirators”: What if Brandon testified to the FBI by stating, “I know XYZ person, and I never saw them break the law. All I know is that we got together for coffee & laughter on the morning of January 6th in the conference room of the Willard Hotel along with Rudy Giuliani, Roger Stone & General Flynn. BOOM! The government suspected that there was a meeting in the morning at the Willard, but didn’t know who was there, and they didn’t have any witness testimony to corroborate the details of the meeting. There are four elements to charge conspiracy, and Straka could have innocently, and unknowingly provided one missing element they need to wrap a bunch of innocent Americans into the criminal conspiracy charge.
One side bar note: Journalist Julie Kelly, who has done a fantastic job collecting information regarding January 6th for her books and articles, and who has done a great job bringing public awareness to the topic — for the expressed purpose of publishing books, made a stunning announcement as she exited the “SPACES” session. Whether she realized it or not, most Americans aren’t very understanding towards people who are too busy to partake in an important topic because they have a tennis appointment. As connected as Julie is to the January 6th defendants and their families, she has once again demonstrated how disconnected she is from middle America. Since day one, Julie has portrayed a willingness to dive deep into the legal system weaponized against the Jan 6th defendants, but her overflowing elitism is exceptionally repulsive. She should refrain from snubbing her nose at the less important, but at the very least, she should be more transparent about her fund raiser funneling schemes and book selling aspirations. Sadly, Julie Kelly has created an impression that she’s in the game to sell books, get on FoxNews, receive praise from the DC elite, and pushing millions via an Steve Bannon’s show to her favored & exclusive non-profits — who are selectively and unfairly distributing critically needed donations to select Jan 6th families and hand picked attorneys. In my opinion, when someone such as Julie Kelly does a “great job”, we all need to get our hackles up when if they leave a trail of improper conduct and intentions. If Steve Bannon only knew of the behind the scenes dynamics, he would certainly avoid the scrutiny which will undoubtedly and eventually come from the U.S. Government — they would LOVE to attach his name to it.
Openly bragging about a more-important tennis appointment to a group of desperate victims of the DOJ should alarm everyone. Many months ago I personally asked Julie Kelly to utilize her self-described influence in DC to get the U.S. Marshals to intervene and investigate mistreatment of the incarcerated detainees. Nothing came of it, and as far as I know, she hasn’t called for help from legislators and the U.S. Marshals to intervene and end the abuse of January 6th detainees in any of her main stream media interviews. There’s no money in ending the abuse. There’s no money in attorneys resolving the Jan 6th cases quickly. Instead, it appears she has focused on funneling millions of people to a non-profit she is intimately connected to (without disclaiming to the public her relationship), founded & run by a extremely controlling and polarizing individual who discriminately distributes 100’s of thousands in donations to those individuals, families and attorney who abide by her dictates. Dysfunctional at minimum; highly questionable to say the least, especially since the leader of the non-profit stated to me that she “didn’t need the little people” anymore, presumably since Julie Kelly has connected her to large media outlets and major donors contributing to the non-profit fund. It’s especially important to note that the fundraising effort was born after I dedicated many months around the clock to helping set up the same family support network we built during the Bundy trials for the defendants. Unfortunately I had a birds-eye view of some very disturbing and dramatic occurrences that I could no longer associate with, but everything I was concerned about is materializing in full view of the public; thankfully, without my name attached to it. It was very obvious to me that the organizations, fund raising mechanisms, attorney and book writers were settling in for the long haul. Of course, there isn’t as much money in resolving the January 6th cases expeditiously.
Since I was released from political imprisonment in October 2017 I’ve worked day & night to investigate the same criminals who wrongfully prosecuted the Bundy Defendants including myself who are now attempting to overthrow our republic. Through our experience, I learned exactly how the government builds conspiracy cases — simply, but clearly stated, I’m an expert in this subject matter. I’ve learned how the federal detention system works, and I’ve also learned how powerful a family support network is on the outside of our incarceration. Very importantly, I’ve also learned how the grifters siphoned millions off our backs as we struggled for freedom in the court system. Fortunately, we won 2 federal trials. Unfortunately for those attempting to deceive the public, I’ve learned how to spot grifters a mile away. Sadly, some of the “cooperators” in our Bundy Cases acted in the same exact suspicious manner that Brandon Straka is exhibiting.
As an investigative journalist facing 4 life sentences, I was involved in successfully prosecuting and winning 2 federal trials. Most federal attorneys do not have such a successful track record. I didn’t do it to sell books. I didn’t do it to maintain & fund raise from millions of followers — they were deleted from my social media accounts. I certainly didn’t do it to get on FoxNews — I’ve been blackballed by FoxNews because the establishment can never have me broadcast what I know about the true corruption within our system that I experienced first hand. Since my return to broadcasting, my viewers have come to know that I deliver 100% of the truth, not 80% so I can raise millions and sell books to a broader, information-deprived audience. My greatest success and wealth has been obtained holding my integrity intact without compromise, especially never intending to save myself, but always putting justice and my country first & above all else.
By continuing to promote and justify secrecy, Brandon Straka is making matters even worse for himself. He could end this painful segment of his journey by demanding an immediate unsealing and release of all documents in his case file. A motion could be filed tomorrow at his request through his attorney. Once the documents are revealed, Brandon Straka can rest well knowing that the people he has potentially harmed at least have a chance to defend themselves. Without knowing what he testified to, they can never have a fair chance at defending against his words.
Most importantly, Brandon Straka has a great opportunity to redeem himself for having received favor and leniency at the expense of everyone around him. He’s unquestionably betrayed his country and fellow Americans to save himself, but he has an opportunity to turn this around for the people he purports to lead. Absent full transparency, there shouldn’t be one person remaining in his circle of influence who can trust him.