Category: Featured Stories

  • DHS WARNS: VIOLENT MONTHS AHEAD

    DHS WARNS: VIOLENT MONTHS AHEAD

    June 7, 2022 at 04:54PM DHS bulletin warns of ‘heightened threat environment,’ violent months ahead

    The Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin Tuesday warning of a “heightened threat environment” over the next several months as they monitor both risks of domestic terrorism and foreign adversaries looking to sow discord within the U.S. to promote acts of violence.

    “The United States remains in a heightened threat environment, as noted in the previous Bulletin, and several recent attacks have highlighted the dynamic and complex nature of the threat environment,” DHS said in a new bulletin from the National Terrorism Advisory System.

    “In the coming months, we expect the threat environment to become more dynamic as several high-profile events could be exploited to justify acts of violence against a range of possible targets,” DHS said.

    The bulletin listed potential targets to include “public gatherings, faith-based institutions, schools, racial and religious minorities, government facilities and personnel, U.S. critical infrastructure, the media, and perceived ideological opponents.”

    “Threat actors have recently mobilized to violence due to factors such as personal grievances, reactions to current events, and adherence to violent extremist ideologies, including racially or ethnically motivated or anti-government/anti-authority violent extremism,” DHS said.

    The department stressed that “foreign adversaries—including terrorist organizations and nation state adversaries—also remain intent on exploiting the threat environment to promote or inspire violence, sow discord, or undermine U.S. democratic institutions.”

    “We continue to assess that the primary threat of mass casualty violence in the United States stems from lone offenders and small groups motivated by a range of ideological beliefs and/or personal grievances,” the bulletin said.

    Evangelist Bruce Warrick performs a baptism outside of Tops grocery store on May 20, 2022 in Buffalo, New York. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

    Evangelist Bruce Warrick performs a baptism outside of Tops grocery store on May 20, 2022 in Buffalo, New York. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
    (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

    DHS pointed to several recent high-profile events including the mass shooting in Buffalo, New York, where the suspect in the grocery store attack allegedly claimed that he was motivated by racist, anti-Black, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. It also referred another May shooting attack in Laguna Woods, California, that targeted congregants of a church that serves the Taiwanese community.

    The department said it is monitoring onling forums following the mass shooting at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, that have been encouraging copycat attacks.

    The bulletin noted how pro-al-Qa‘ida and ISIS users online have celebrated the April subway mass shooting in Brooklyn, New York, and the January hostage situation at a synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, carried out by a British national in an attempt to inspire U.S. based individuals to engage in violent activity.

    The update from DHS Tuesday reiterated from its previous bulletin that individuals both for and against abortion online have advocated for violence against government, religious, and reproductive healthcare personnel, and facilities in response to the high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case.

    “Chinese, Iranian, Russian, and other foreign malign influence actors have sought to contribute to U.S. internal discord and weaken its focus and position internationally,” the DHS said. “As the U.S. 2022 mid-term elections approach, malign foreign actors could bolster their messaging to sow discord and influence U.S. audiences in keeping with practices during previous election cycles.”

    The bulletin noted how foreign actors have amplified narratives promoting societal division in the U.S., including since the onset of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

    Danielle Wallace is a reporter for Fox News Digital covering politics, crime, police and more. Story tips can be sent to danielle.wallace@fox.com and on Twitter: @danimwallace.

    via Fox News

  • Another Brit Recommends Gun-Grab: BBC Reporter – U.S. Should Just Ban All Guns

    Another Brit Recommends Gun-Grab: BBC Reporter – U.S. Should Just Ban All Guns

    Video: BBC Reporter To MSNBC – U.S. Should Just Ban All Guns

    Appearing on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, a BBC reporter appeared completely confounded as to why the U.S. government hasn’t just banned guns altogether like the UK did in the 1990s.

    BBC reporter Katty Kay, who was brought on to talk about the Queen’s Jubilee, was used by Joe Scarborough to hammer home the point that all the British people he knows keep asking him “what’s wrong with you Americans and your guns?”

    “The contrast, and it’s between the United States and Great Britain, is so striking, considering we share so much in common,” Scarborough continued, adding “But in this one area, it’s just — the difference is just shocking, isn’t it?”

    Kay agreed, adding “this is making it very hard for allies of America, friends of America, people who love this country as I do, who’ve lived here for very long, to defend the country at the moment, when every single morning, we wake up and there is another mass shooting.”

    She continued, “we keep getting asked, what is going on in that country? Why can’t they fix this? In the UK, you know this, Joe, they fixed it.”

    “It was a conservative government that fixed the United Kingdom’s gun problem in 1980 after a mass shooting. They banned assault weapons,” Kay proclaimed.

    The reporter added that “In the 1990s, they banned handguns after one school shooting. It’s all it took, in Dunblain, Scotland, and the United Kingdom banned handguns. It now has amongst the lowest rate of gun deaths of any westernized countries.”

    “No other Western country tolerates this,” Kay further declared.

    Watch:

    Last week Joe Biden announced an intention to bring about sweeping gun control measures, including a ban on “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines, as well as red flag laws, new laws on background checks and storage, and a vow to “repeal the immunity of gun manufacturers from liability.”

    Biden claimed during his speech that he wasn’t taking away anyone’s rights.

    ———————————————————————————————————————

    ALERT! In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

    We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here.

    Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

    Also, we urgently need your financial support here. ———————————————————————————————————————

    via Infowars https://ift.tt/UJGCQ9n

    June 7, 2022 at 10:39AM

  • Trump To Declare 2024 Candidacy July 4th

    Trump To Declare 2024 Candidacy July 4th

    June 7, 2022 at 07:07AM Report: Trump Toying With Declaring Campaign For President Early

    We are getting closer and closer to 45th President Donald Trump running for President in 2024.

    A new report is claiming that President Donald Trump is considering declaring he will run for President in 2024 early.

    From Business Insider:

    Former President Donald Trump has been thinking about declaring a 2024 presidential bid early, according to NBC News.

    While the consensus in GOP circles has been that Trump would hold off on annoucing any formal decision until after the 2022 midterm elections in November, some advisors told NBC that may be shifting.

    Jason Miller, the CEO of Gettr and a former top Trump White House aide, explained why an early announcement could be advantageous for the former president.

    “I’ve laid out my case on why I think he should do it,” Miller told NBC. “I think that there being clarity about what his intentions are [is important] so he can start building that operation while it’s still fresh in people’s minds and they’re still active — a lot of that can be converted into 2024 action.”

    It could be as early as July 4th:

    From NBC:

    One question is “whether he can sort of suppress his excitement about a 2024 rematch and not, say, go ahead and put that statement out … and waits for a big event, a big speech to do it,” the second adviser said. “A betting person says he’s doing it, and he also wants to crowd out the rest of the field.”

    Two people in Trump’s orbit told NBC News they had been asked informally to hold July 4 as a date for a possible announcement, but Miller — noting that Trump hasn’t yet decided to run — said it is “not true” that the day has been reserved, even unofficially, for a launch.

    Without specifically addressing the question of timing, Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich said in a text exchange with NBC News that he sees growing public appetite for a Trump comeback.

    “America was strong, prosperous and greatly respected under President Trump, and that’s why he continues to have unprecedented strength through his endorsement record and the demand for his leadership has never been higher,” Budowich said.

    via ThePalmieriReport

  • Columbus Ohio Reveals Scheme to Regulate Guns Through Board Of Health

    Columbus Ohio Reveals Scheme to Regulate Guns Through Board Of Health

    The Ohio Legislature has made it crystal clear that it wants ONE set of consistent firearm laws across the state, and it has specifically forbidden municipalities from regulating guns in any manner.

    However, even though the state’s “preemption” law, spelled out in Ohio Revised Code 9.68, has been in force since March 2007 and was further strengthened in 2019, and even though the law has withstood court challenges, the City of Columbus continues to look for ways to regulate guns locally.

    On February 15, 2022, Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther declared gun violence a “public health crisis.” He also said this declaration was just the “first step.” While it was unclear at the time what that meant, we may now have a better idea of what Columbus officials are planning.

    On May 17, 2022, during an online meeting of the Columbus Board of Health, Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein and Solicitor General Rich Coglianese presented a scheme to regulate guns through health orders.

    You can watch the meeting video for yourself here, courtesy of ABC 6. Klein’s comments start at about 31 minutes, Coglianese’s at about 37 minutes.

    Klein bemoans that Ohio cities are unable to regulate guns because of the state’s “preemption” law, and he admits that the goal is to look for loopholes and exceptions. He also says that because Mayor Ginther has declared gun violence a “public health crisis,” they now have an opportunity to “act.”

    Klein then introduces Solicitor General Rich Coglianese to explain their legal argument. According to Coglianese, there is a loophole in Ohio law which can be exploited by the Columbus Board of Health to regulate guns as a public “nuisance.”

    Here are the details of the argument:

    R.C. 3707.01(B) says, “The board of health of a city or general health district shall abate and remove all nuisances within its jurisdiction.” So what is a nuisance? According to Coglianese, the answer lies in a 20-year-old Ohio Supreme Court case where Cincinnati wanted to hold gun manufacturers liable for the costs of gun violence.

    He cites Cincinnati v. Beretta USA Corp., 95 Ohio St. 3d 416 ¶8 (2002) as a basis for considering guns a “public nuisance,” which is defined as an “…unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”

    From the same case, he further cites the definition of “unreasonable interference” to include “… those acts that significantly interfere with public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience, conduct that is contrary to a statute, ordinance, or regulation, or conduct that is of a continuing nature or one which has produced a permanent or long-lasting effect upon the public right, an effect of which the actor is aware or should be aware.”

    So if the city can show that guns interfere with “public health, safety, peace,” etc. and have a “permanent or long-lasting effect,” guns can be considered a nuisance and regulated under the authority of the Board of Health.

    What about Ohio’s “preemption” law in R.C. 9.68 that prohibits local regulation of guns? Coglianese says there’s a loophole because the law allows cities to mirror state and federal laws where it says, “Except as specifically provided by the United States Constitution, Ohio Constitution, state law, or federal law ….”

    In other words, Coglianese concludes R.C. 9.68 would actually allow a municipal board of health to enact a local law to mirror state law on the matter of abating and removing guns as a public nuisance.

    Coglianese also dispenses with SB 22, a law passed last year to rein in the authority of health orders. He claims that while that law prohibits orders or regulations directed at a class of persons, it allows orders or regulations aimed at specific persons, and that gun owners could be considered “specific” rather than a class of persons. In addition, he argues that SB 22 does not mention any limitation on the regulation of items or property, such as firearms.

    According to other comments during this meeting, the Columbus Board of Health, along with the city attorneys, will continue exploring this gun regulation scheme in the coming months. It seems their next step may be to collect data to demonstrate that guns interfere with “public health” and have a “permanent or long-lasting effect.” And then on that basis, empower the Board of Health to take action.

    Exactly what sort of action? If I were to be generous, I might assume that they merely intend to get guns out of the hands of those who are legally disqualified from possessing them. But if that were the case, why not just enforce current law? Why look for loopholes and mount clever legal arguments?

    Given the history of Columbus, it’s more likely that their intent is to enact rifle bans, magazine bans, red flag laws, waiting periods, universal background checks, and so on. And they’re likely to prohibit permitless carry as well.

    Aren’t they afraid of violating state law or concerned about being sued? Not likely. They’ve flouted state law before, so they won’t be shy about doing it again. And from their point of view, who cares if they get sued? They can just use public tax dollars to litigate. It doesn’t matter if they lose, because they’re spending other people’s money.

    It is no secret that Columbus leaders want the power to pass their own gun laws and have challenged state law repeatedly, including passing illegal gun control laws and even filing suit against the State of Ohio to overturn preemption.

    So what can we do about this?

    Buckeye Firearms Association is carefully studying the legal argument. And we will continue to watch Columbus and the Board of Health closely. However, be assured that we are committed to responding to his outrageous power grab if we believe there is any chance Columbus will actually move forward.

    Whether we respond with legislation or litigation remains to be seen, but one thing is sure: We will NOT sit idly if Ohio’s capital city attempts to once again exceed its authority and infringe the rights of gun owners. We can’t. Because if Columbus gets away with this audacious scheme, other cities will do the same.

    And if that happens, what’s the point of having a preemption law at all? If any city can simply declare guns a public nuisance and regulate guns through their board of health, we’re back to the patchwork of laws the Ohio legislature sought to eliminate in 2007. And ALL the work we’ve done for the past two decades evaporates.

    If you want to tell the Columbus Board of Health to stop pursuing this unlawful scheme, you can call them at 614-645-7417 or email health@columbus.gov.

  • Biden Administration Declare National Emergency for Clean Energy Production, Invokes Defense Production Act to Facilitate Faster Transformation of Energy Economy Away from Fossil Fuels – The Last Refuge

    Biden Administration Declare National Emergency for Clean Energy Production, Invokes Defense Production Act to Facilitate Faster Transformation of Energy Economy Away from Fossil Fuels – The Last Refuge

    https://ift.tt/3YBUu84

    Earlier today, Joe Biden, working toward the agenda of Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Wall Street multinationals, and the radical climate change activists within the far left of the socialist democrat party, declared a national emergency around the issue of U.S. energy prices and policies. [SEE HERE]

    On the front side of the justification, the people in control of the Biden administration, claim that current and future increases in energy prices are likely to do severe damage to the economy and the lives of all Americans.  However, in the background of the issue, this is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ phase of an energy crisis the administration has intentionally created.

    The real goal is to fundamentally transform the foundation of the U.S. economy away from fossil fuels and into a new era of clean renewable energy. This is what all of the Biden cabinet officers now refer to as the “economic transition” phase.

    Joe Biden’s executive announcement today is the triggering of increased federal government control over the United States energy system.

    Ideological government intervention, completely disconnected from the free market, is facilitated by the declaration of a federal national emergency:

    [WHITE HOUSE] – Today, President Biden is authorizing the use of the Defense Production Act (DPA) to accelerate domestic production of clean energy technologies – unlocking new powers to meet this moment. Specifically, the President is authorizing the Department of Energy to use the DPA to rapidly expand American manufacturing of five critical clean energy technologies:

      • Solar panel parts like photovoltaic modules and module components;
      • Building insulation;
      • Heat pumps, which heat and cool buildings super efficiently;
      • Equipment for making and using clean electricity-generated fuels, including electrolyzers, fuel cells, and related platinum group metals; and
      • Critical power grid infrastructure like transformers.

    In deploying the DPA, the Biden-Harris Administration will strongly encourage the use of strong labor standards, including project labor agreements and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and include local hire provisions. The Administration also will strongly encourage projects with environmental justice outcomes that empower the clean energy transition in low-income communities historically overburdened by legacy pollution.

    Following this announcement, the White House and the Department of Energy will convene relevant industry, labor, environmental justice, and other key stakeholders as we maximize the impact of the DPA tools made available by President Biden’s actions and strengthen domestic clean energy manufacturing. (more)

    The Biden administration then immediately triggered the Defense Production Act for the U.S. government to: (a) suspend tarrifs; and (b) take control over procurement for all key components needed in the transition from fossil fuel to solar energy.   The products will come from Southeast Asia as the main hub of solar equipment is not located within the United States. DPA Excerpt:

    […] exported from the Kingdom of Cambodia, Malaysia, the Kingdom of Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and that are not already subject to an antidumping or countervailing duty order as of the date of this proclamation, and to temporarily extend during the course of the emergency the time therein prescribed for the performance of any act related to such imports. (read more)

    The DPA emergency authorities have been given to the Dept of Commerce and the people working under Commerce Secretary Gina M. Raimondo, the former governor of Rhode Island.  Each of the DPA’s released today targets specific components of the solar industry [SOURCE LINK].

    Obviously, this massive shift in the governmental takeover of energy development is part of facilitating the aforementioned “Green New Deal.”  The approach follows a pattern that is transparent for those who are capable of accepting things as they are, not as we would wish them to be.

    Joe Biden shut down domestic energy development, cancelled pipelines, cancelled leases, retracted the ability to drill in ANWAR (Alaska), and triggered massive new regulatory approaches from the Commerce, Interior and Energy departments.  The resulting increases in oil, natural gas, gasoline, electricity and energy costs overall – which became fuel on the furnace of inflation, have now created the energy crisis that Joe Biden is declaring a national emergency to solve.

    Biden himself has no idea what is happening; he is simply following the instructions of the policy operators who are in control of the administration.  It is the people in the circles of Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and the climate change activists within the DC bureaucracy that are executing the nuts-and-bolts shifts.  They tell Biden what to do, and he cluelessly does it.  We are the people who end up paying the price for their effort.

    It would appear the primary goal is to push everything as fast as possible beyond an infrastructure threshold that could be reversed if/when the radicals are rebuked by the victims, us.

    The democrat-socialists are ‘all-in‘ on this economic kamikaze mission.

    The radicals took off on inauguration day with a nuclear economic device and only enough fuel for a one-way trip.  They are nearing their destination.

    Additionally, using the anniversary of June 6, 1944, is not coincidental.  These sickos and ideologues sit around worshipping sustainable algae cakes and giggling about this stuff.

    via The Last Refuge

    June 7, 2022 at 04:29AM

  • Massive Migrant Caravan Heading For U.S. Border – Potentially Largest Ever

    Massive Migrant Caravan Heading For U.S. Border – Potentially Largest Ever

    June 6, 2022 at 04:31PM Massive Migrant Caravan Heading For U.S. Border: ‘Potentially Largest Ever’

    Another massive migrant caravan described as “potentially the largest” ever is currently en route to the U.S. border, with some participants pointing to President Joe Biden’s statements among their reasons for coming.

    One Haitian traveling with the caravan told Fox News he wants Biden to keep his promise to allow them to stay once they arrive.

    “He promised the Haitian community he will help them,” the migrant said on Friday. “He will recall Title 42. He will help us have real asylum.”

    The outlet continued:

    The migrant is taking part in a caravan that could become the largest ever to reach the U.S. southern border, with the current number of close to 10,000 migrants, is expected to swell to about 15,000 before it reaches the border.

    The caravan departed Tapachula on the Mexico-Guatemala border on Monday. The migrants, which mostly come from Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua, will travel what is known as the coastal route to reach the U.S. border.

    Fox News labeled the masses of migrants “potentially the largest caravan ever.”

    “We consider we are around 9,500, it measures 5 1/2 km from the start to the end, people keep on joining, in the first police check there were approx 100-150 national guard, INM, state police and let us through freely,” the caravan’s organizer, Luis Villagran, told Fox News on Monday.

    Their comments come as the Biden administration continues to wage legal war in its bid to end Title 42, a Trump-era rule that authorized rapid deportation of most illegal aliens, bypassing the typical legal process, due to the pandemic.

    The intent of the rule was to slow the spread of the deadly virus, though President Trump was labeled a racist for implementing it. Earlier this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced it planned to lift the order.

    “But a lawsuit filed by 24 states at least temporarily put plans to end the rule to a halt, with a Louisiana U.S. District Judge ruling that the restrictions can stay in place until the lawsuit is resolved,” Fox News noted. “The states have argued that lifting the rule would lead to a ‘wave of illegal migration and drug trafficking.’”

    Critics have pointed fingers at President Biden for creating what has turned into a migrant crisis after reversing the vast majority of immigration and border security policies Trump implemented — which led to historic reductions in illegal crossings. Trump also managed to finance the construction of hundreds of miles of border wall, which some Border Patrol agents have said was helpful in curbing illegal crossings.

    The results of his policy reversals are historic levels of illegal immigration and drug smuggling, which have been detrimental to his approval rating and may have led to a change of heart.

    “Don’t leave your town or city or community,” Biden said in an interview with ABC last year. “We’re gonna make sure we have facilities in those cities and towns run by department of — by DHS and also access with HHS, the Health and Human Services, to say you can apply for asylum from where you are right now.”

    But that said, Biden’s actions are speaking louder than his words. He has yet to re-impose Trump-era rules and his administration is continuing to argue against border security measures Trump enacted that Biden cannot quickly end.

    That sends the message to migrants that it is still okay to try and make it to the U.S.

    “Now we need him to keep his promise.” the Haitian migrant said.

    Republican governors have attempted to give Biden a taste of his medicine.

    Earlier this spring, Govs. Greg Abbott of Texas and Doug Ducey of Arizona began busing illegal migrants to Washington, D.C., as a means of keeping them out of their states and forcing the administration to have to deal with them directly.

    “According to TDEM, Abbott’s plan is already working. The agency told Fox News on Monday that many of the communities that originally reached out for support – from the Rio Grande Valley to Terrell County – say the federal government stopped dropping immigrants in their towns since Abbott’s announcement on April 6,” the network reported separately in mid-April.

    From conservativebrief.com

  • Nuclear war is coming Putin’s mouthpiece threatens west with World War 3 warning

    Nuclear war is coming Putin’s mouthpiece threatens west with World War 3 warning

    June 6, 2022 at 05:54AM ‘Nuclear war is coming’ Putin’s mouthpiece threatens west with ‘World War 3’ warning

    Russian political scientist Sergey Mikheyev used Russia’s state-controlled TV to send a nuclear warning to the West. Speaking on Russia’s Channel 1, he threatened that the weapons that keep reaching Ukraine will see the war in Ukraine escalate into WW3. “The nuclear war is coming”, he added after warning “[the West] don’t understand what happens next”.

    Speaking live on Russian state TV, Mr Mikheyev said: “[The West] talk about how many more weapons are being sent and how frightening these weapons are.

    “They don’t understand what happens next.

    “They all say ‘terrible weapons are arriving over there, they keep coming and coming’.

    “They promised not to use them a certain way.

    “But most likely they will do it anyway.

    “And that will lead to WW3.

    “Then we’re being told ‘calm down, comrades, everything will be alright’.

    “Those guys will send weapons and so will others.

    READ MORE: ‘Drained and weak’ Putin showing signs of ‘regret’

    “There will be a nuclear war.”

    Referring to Mr Mikheyev’s words, Channel 1 host also added: “I’m sick of them [the West].

    “Reading about whatever they come up with next, like their new lists of sanctions.

    “If you want war with us, then declare war.

    “We will strike the decision-making centres and those are not in Kyiv.

    “We knew that our adversary is NATO, and all our weapons were developed not merely for Ukraine, but for a confrontation with the NATO bloc.

    “We could spit on whatever they send to Ukraine”.

    The claims came as US President Joe Biden announced that new weapons and aid package will be sent to Ukraine in the coming days.

    In a statement, he announced that the US would send “more advanced rocket systems and munitions that will enable [Ukrainian soldiers] to more precisely strike key targets on the battlefield in Ukraine”.

    Among the weapons, long-range missiles are also believed to be part of the package that will reach Ukraine in the next few days.

    The US had previously been unwilling to send these weapons out of fear that could be used against targets in Russian territory, given their ability to launch missiles at a distance of over 45 miles away.

    Ukraine, however, has assured the US and confirmed it will not use the long-range missiles for those purposes.

    via Express.co.uk

    Russia on alert as 40 NATO warships and 7,000 troops amass in Baltic

    NATO member states sent over 40 warships and 7,000 troops to Stockholm this weekend in what has been seen as a warning to Russia following Sweden and neighbouring Finland’s application to join the military alliance.

    Military vessels from 14 NATO states arrived in the Nordic capital on Saturday to participate in a training exercise alongside Finland and Sweden. The exercise, called Baltops, aims to test the ability of these countries’ navies, air forces and troops to work together.

  • CISA Releases Bombshell Report: Dominion Voting Machines Unsecured

    CISA Releases Bombshell Report: Dominion Voting Machines Unsecured

    CISA released its much-anticipated report on Dominion Voting Machines on Friday afternoon before the weekend.

    Last Saturday, CNN admitted that Dominion Voting Machine Software has flaws that can be exploited.

    Federal authorities finally admitted to this truth last Saturday during the long holiday weekend.

    The same officials who did not inspect the machines after the election told CNN that there is no evidence that the machines were tampered with.

    The Fake News Media, which obviously has a vested interest in the outcome of a rigged election as they receive hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising revenue from big pharma, etc., immediately published news reports which spun a false narrative.

    CBS NEWS: “U.S. finds no evidence flaws in Dominion voting machines were ever exploited”

    WASHINGTON POST: “No evidence of exploitation of Dominion voting machine flaws…”

    The Fake News Media spun the government report to suit the narrative favorable to those who steal elections by failing to mention one very important fact: Hackers who can exploit the vulnerabilities outlined in the CISA report can also write software to remove all evidence of their hacking. Essentially, they lied to the public by omission.

    Clinton Curtis a veteran computer programmer, testified in 2004 at a U.S. Congressional Hearing about being contacted by a Florida Congress person to rig Florida’s elections.

  • Lindsey Graham Sides With Biden On Gun Grab

    Lindsey Graham Sides With Biden On Gun Grab

    Senator Lindsey Graham Says He Is Ready to Vote on ALL Gun Control Proposals Mentioned by Joe Biden

    GOP Senator Lindsey Graham (SC) on Thursday evening said he is ready to vote on ALL gun control proposals mentioned by Joe Biden.

    Lindsey Graham also urged Schumer to bring the gun control proposals forward for votes.

    “I stand ready to vote on ALL the proposals mentioned by President Biden tonight and encourage the Democratic Leader to bring them forward for votes.” Lindsey Graham said.

    Senator Graham also added he is ready to “work across the aisle to find common ground” on gun control legislation.

    Joe Biden Thursday evening delivered remarks on the recent mass shootings and called on Congress to reinstate the 1994 ‘Assault Weapons Ban.’

    Biden attacked the Second Amendment – AGAIN – and said no amendment is absolute.

    Joe Biden called for ‘red flag laws’ and demanded the 1994 ‘Assault Weapons Ban’ be reinstated.

    “We need to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines, and if we can’t ban assault weapons, then we should raise the age to purchase them from 18 to 21,” said Biden.

    Joe Biden also called on Congress to limit how many rounds a weapon can hold.

    “We should limit how many rounds a weapon can hold. Why in God’s name should an ordinary citizen be able to purchase an assault weapon that holds 30-round magazines, that let mass shooters fire hundreds of bullets in a matter of minutes?” Biden said.

    And sellout Lindsey Graham is ready to go full steam ahead on Biden’s proposals attacking the Second Amendment.


    Lindsey Graham says he owns an AR-15 in case of a ‘natural disaster’ and ‘gangs’

    Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said on “Fox News Sunday” he would use his AR-15 to defend his home if needed, a comment that drew the ire of some gun control advocates. 

    “If there is a natural disaster in South Carolina where the cops can’t protect my neighborhood, my house will be the last one that the gang will come to because I can defend myself,” the South Carolina senator told the show’s host, Chris Wallace.

    “If you have (an AR-15) lawfully, I think you should be allowed to keep it,” he added.

    Graham admitted to owning the assault rifle after Wallace asked what was wrong with a serious debate on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.

    “At the end of the day if you think an assault weapons ban is what the country needs, bring it to the floor of the United States Senate and vote on it. I welcome that debate,” Graham said.

  • No, Durham Is NOT Done…Not By a Long Shot!

    No, Durham Is NOT Done…Not By a Long Shot!

    June 3, 2022 at 07:06AM No, Durham Is NOT Done…Not By a Long Shot!

    I continue to bring you the BIG PICTURE on all things Durham related.

    Not false hope…

    Not hopium…

    But reading between the lines and figuring out what’s really going on.

    Because I’ve noticed one thing: President Trump, Kash, Nunes, and even Bill Barr and John Durham do not look AT ALL worried.

    Have you noticed that?

    They all look extremely calm and comfortable.  Relaxed even!

    They do not look worried or like they are losing — the complete opposite.

    So what is going on?

    When you start to understand some of the bigger puzzle pieces, you realize Durham is playing the long game and he’s not even remotely done.

    He’s in the bottom of the Third Inning of a very long and serious baseball game.

    Just look at his picture above…this was taken after the Sussmann verdict came in.

    He’s smirking!

    Does this look like a guy that just lost a big case?

    Not to me.

    Looks like a guy that maybe just trapped them all in an epic sting.

    We shall see very soon…

    And then read this PERFECT summary from the Washington Examiner:

    Former Attorney General William Barr praised the case brought by special counsel John Durham against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, even though the prosecutor lost the legal fight this week.

    More significant than securing a conviction, Barr reasoned Wednesday, is how Durham has pulled back the curtain regarding the extent to which Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and its allies spread theories tying rival Donald Trump to Russia in the final months of the election, as well as the conduct of the FBI.

    “I’m very proud of John Durham. And I do take responsibility for his appointment,” Barr told Fox News host Jesse Watters. “I think he and his team did an exceptionally able job both digging out very important facts and presenting a compelling case to the jury.”

    Sussmann was charged with lying to the FBI about whom he was representing when, in September 2016, he presented internet data that suggested a now-discredited link between Trump and Russia’s Alfa-Bank. In particular, Sussmann was indicted on charges of concealing his clients — Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and “Tech Executive-1,” known to be former Neustar executive Rodney Joffe — from FBI general counsel James Baker. Sussmann denied lying to the FBI and pleaded not guilty.

    The jury in Washington, D.C., sided with Sussmann on Tuesday. “Despite being falsely accused, I believe that justice ultimately prevailed in my case,” Sussmann said in a brief statement after the verdict.

    Barr, who appointed Durham to investigate the origins and conduct of the Russia inquiry, said the special counsel “accomplished something far more important” than a conviction by bringing out the “truth” across two areas.

    “First, I think he crystallized the central role played by the Hillary campaign and launching as a dirty trick the whole Russiagate collusion narrative and fanning the flames of it,” he said. “And, second, I think he exposed really dreadful behavior by the supervisors in the FBI, the senior ranks of the FBI, who knowingly used this information to start an investigation of Trump and then duped their own agents by lying to them and refusing to tell them what the real source of that information was. And that was appalling.”

    Barr has long signaled skepticism about whether the Trump-Russia investigation was opened on sound legal footing. It began in late July 2016 after Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos bragged to an Australian diplomat that he heard the Russians had damaging information on Clinton. The FBI’s counterintelligence investigation, dubbed “Crossfire Hurricane,” was later wrapped into special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference. Mueller’s team was unable to establish criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

    Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz determined there was sufficient cause for the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign. But both Barr and Durham publicly disagreed with that conclusion in late 2019.

    This Alfa-Bank matter tied to the Clinton team may not have spurred the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s links to Russia, but Barr recently said he accepted the chance to become attorney general, his second stint, because he believed a “constitutional crisis” was afoot.

    “I think whatever you think of Trump, the fact is that the whole Russiagate thing was a grave injustice. It appears to be a dirty political trick that was used first to hobble him and then potentially to drive him from office,” Barr told BlazeTV host Glenn Beck on an episode of his podcast. Barr also said he believes “it is seditious” but stressed that criminality would have to be determined in court.

    One revelation during the trial came from Robby Mook, the campaign manager for Clinton in 2016, who said the candidate personally signed off on sharing since-debunked Trump-Russia allegations related to Alfa-Bank with the media during the election. During the trial, Mook admitted he was not confident in the veracity of the Alfa-Bank claims when the decision was made to share them with the press but claimed the media would help vet the information. “We wanted the American people to know about it, yeah,” he said when asked if the campaign was pleased the allegations were published.

    via We Love Trump