PeterSantilli.com

Blog

  • SCOTUS Decided To Suddenly Halt GA Election, Shows Flip Flops Of Raffensperger And Voting Rights Agenda

    SCOTUS Decided To Suddenly Halt GA Election, Shows Flip Flops Of Raffensperger And Voting Rights Agenda

    In August 2022, SCOTUS dropped into an election law case in Georgia that claimed to protect Black voters, and they used their supreme power to temporarily stop an election in Georgia, reviving the ruling from a federal judge that said the state had disadvantaged black voters in violation of the Voting Rights Act.

    One Republican is saying it will help the Democrats gain a seat, and some people see GA SOS Brad Raffensperger sitting on his hands.

    Earlier in August, local GA news reported:

    In a significant victory for voting rights groups, a federal judge has ruled that the at-large method for electing Georgia’s Public Service Commission dilutes Black votes and violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

    The ruling will immediately stop Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger from preparing ballots for the November elections that include the District 2 and District 3 races for the PSC.

    Leftist organization of election usurper, Marc Elias, ‘Democracy Docket’ reported at the time:

    “UPDATE: On Aug. 19, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) withdrew his motion to stay the injunction pending appeal, meaning that elections for the Public Service Commission will not be held this November. An appeal will continue to be litigated before the 11th Circuit.”

    The case began in Georgia when a group of Black leaders sued the state, claiming the Republican-controlled General Assembly approved a redistricting plan last year that dilutes the Black vote in two of the five PSC districts.

    The New York Times reported that about a third of Georgians are Black, but Black voters are in a majority in District 3, which is made up of counties in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Four Black voters from that district sued to challenge statewide elections for commissioners, saying the practice violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting their power to elect candidates of their choice.

    Judge Steven D. Grimberg of the Federal District Court in Atlanta, who was appointed by President Donald J. Trump, agreed, ruling that elections for the two commission seats on the ballot in November could not proceed until state lawmakers eliminated statewide elections for them. The current commissioners, he said, would remain in their positions in the meantime.

    Tim Echols, the Jackson County Republican who represents Athens on the Georgia Public Service Commission, is warning that Democrats may be able to pick up some seats as a result of the ruling.

    “In an unsigned order without noted dissents, the justices wrote that an appeals court’s reason for staying the judge’s ruling — that it had come too close to the election in November — was flawed because state officials had told the judge that there was enough time to make the required adjustments. The Supreme Court vacated the stay and returned the case to the appeals court for reconsideration,” the New York Times reported.

    “The court’s order was an exception to what legal experts say is a growing trend: a near-categorical ban on late changes to state election procedures even when those changes have been ruled necessary to address illegal infringements of the right to vote. But the exception was based on an unusual concession from state officials and therefore may not have larger implications,” the Times report added.

    Echols warned that his seat and that of fellow PSC member Fitz Johnson will not be on the November election ballot and could put them in jeopardy.

    “Echols says the legislature will likely have to change the election law before the next PSC elections can be held. Both Echols and Johnson were to have Democratic challengers in elections that will take place nine weeks from today,” local news station WGAU reported.

    “Echols also slammed Fulton County Superior Court Judge Melynee Leftridge for ruling that Democrat Patty Durand can be on the ballot for the November election for a seat on the GSC,” Martin Walsh reported for Republic Brief.

    There had been questions about her residency in the District she’s running to represent, the PSC district that includes Athens. That post is held by Echols.

    “Durand, who is not a plaintiff in the voting rights case, previously lived in Gwinnett County, which was in District 2. Then, before candidate qualifying earlier this year, state lawmakers passed redrawn district maps for all five PSC seats and moved Gwinnett County out of District 2,” the Atlanta-Journal Constitution reported.

    “On the eve of the May primary, Raffensperger disqualified Durand from the race, arguing she had not lived in the new District 2 long enough to be eligible. But on Election Day, Leftridge allowed Durand to stay on the primary ballot,” the outlet continued.

    Durand’s attorney, Bryan Sells, admitted she has not lived in the district long enough to be eligible. However, he attempted to claim Durand is a victim being targeted by Republicans.

    “The move was a rare example of the conservative court siding with voters over state officials in disputes regarding election rules, especially when the court is asked to act on an emergency basis. The Supreme Court restored a district court ruling requiring that this year’s election for two of the commission seats be postponed so that the legislature could create a new system for electing commissioners,” CNN reported.

    Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger can appeal the case to the Georgia Supreme Court depending.

  • GUNS AND AMMO STOLEN! Explosive Audit Results Show ATF And Admin State Is Unsafe

    GUNS AND AMMO STOLEN! Explosive Audit Results Show ATF And Admin State Is Unsafe

    Here is why we need to regularly audit all public institutions: What do we know about the ATF? Media reports have confirmed there were ATF agents working undercover at Jan. 6th… but what about their agency?  Is it safe? Do they protect the weapons they take from Americans- because that is their job- and they are not doing well. Here is how we know they are not doing it well: A new explosive OIG report shows that the government workers in Washington DC are a clown show and also a serious disaster for our safety. While the tyrants in DC talk about stealing guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans- for self-defense- they are also getting paid to safeguard gun and ammo stockpiles, which they have allowed to be stolen by the bus load. Check this out from a September 2022 audit of the ATF: “The OIG undertook this audit following the discovery that thousands of firearms, firearm parts and ammunition had been stolen from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (ATF) National Destruction Branch (NDB) facility in Martinsburg, West Virginia. Our audit objectives were to: (1) assess the adequacy of the ATF’s controls over firearms approved for disposal, and (2) evaluate the ATF’s processes for ensuring all firearms sent to its disposal facility are ultimately destroyed. This audit covers the ATF’s firearm disposal practices at its NDB facility from March 2019 through April 2022.” From the report, here is what caused the audit: “Since September 2015, the NDB has been responsible for disposing of thousands of ATF-owned firearms and firearms seized for forfeiture each year by the ATF and other Department law enforcement agencies. In August 2019, a former contract security guard stationed at the ATF facility in Martinsburg was sentenced to 14 years in prison for stealing thousands of firearms, firearm parts, and ammunition from the NDB facility from 2016 to 2019. The events that led to this conviction triggered two internal ATF inspections of the NDB facility and an OIG investigation that resulted in the identification of several vulnerabilities that enabled the thefts to occur undetected, as well as recommendations for corrective action by the ATF’s internal inspection groups.” Here is what the auditor found was the problem: “We found that NDB staff does not consistently adhere to established operating procedures in place to mitigate risk of firearms being lost or stolen. Specifically, we observed NDB staff: (1) propping open doors into secure areas of the facility solely for the sake of convenience, (2) allowing visitors to enter the facility through doorways other than the main entrance and drive their cars into the facility to unload firearms, and (3) permitting unauthorized individuals to access NDB vault storage spaces. Failure to strictly adhere to established operating procedures not only undermines the NDB’s security protocol, but unnecessarily places firearms in NDB custody at risk of loss or theft.” Here is how they got away with being reckless criminals with it before the audit: “We identified blind spots in the NDB’s surveillance camera coverage of both the interior and exterior areas of the facility that could be exploited by an individual seeking to conceal illicit activity. We also found that the low resolution of some of the surveillance video does not allow the viewer to identify individuals or discern activities conducted within certain secure areas of the facility. In addition, we found that 1 of the 13 cameras covering the facility was not functioning. This issue went unnoticed until we pointed it out to the ATF’s Physical Security Programs Branch, indicating that the ATF is not regularly inspecting surveillance cameras at the NDB to ensure they are functioning” So while the ATF is busy harassing Americans, they are literally letting guns go right out the front door and into the hands of criminals. Check out what Markwayne Mullin reported, along with Republicans who are watching the ATF: Read the full report from the OIG here: REPORT
  • Revising American History: Trump’s Statement About The National Archives Fact Checked-Shocking Results

    Revising American History: Trump’s Statement About The National Archives Fact Checked-Shocking Results

    One of the long-time plans of the Marxist left is to change the foundations of American history, or at least erase the parts that make it difficult for the government to have a massive centralized authority by which to control the free people of the United States of America. According to sources, we are one step closer to see everything we love about America re-written by radicals.

    The following statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America, which he released on Monday, was fact-checked and found to be: TRUE.

    “The Radical Left controlled NARA (the National Archives and Records Administration), now becoming more famous than ever, placed a “Harmful Content Warning” on The Constitution of the United States, labeling our Country’s governing document as “harmful,” among other things. This Warning includes the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. Remember, this is the group wrongfully complaining about me—and instigating the Raid on Mar-a-Lago.”

    Trump linked to an article by Haley Strack in the Federalist in his statement.  Strack reported on the further usurpation of our Republic through our National Archives.

    “The National Archives Records Administration placed a “harmful content” warning on the Constitution, labeling the governing document of the United States as “harmful or difficult to view.” The warning applies to all documents across the Archives’ cataloged website, including the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence,” Strack wrote.

    “NARA’s records span the history of the United States, and it is our charge to preserve and make available these historical records,” the administration said in a statement. “As a result, some of the materials presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly violent views and opinions. In addition, some of the materials may relate to violent or graphic events and are preserved for their historical significance,” according to a statement on their website.

    And yep- there it is:

    NARA’s Statement on Potentially Harmful Content

    The Catalog and web pages of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) provide access to many millions of descriptions and digital copies of the permanent records of the United States federal government.

    The Catalog and web pages contain some content that may be harmful or difficult to view. NARA’s records span the history of the United States, and it is our charge to preserve and make available these historical records. As a result, some of the materials presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly violent views and opinions. In addition, some of the materials may relate to violent or graphic events and are preserved for their historical significance.

    The National Archives is committed to working with staff, communities, and peer institutions to assess and update descriptions that are harmful and to establish standards and policies to prevent future harmful language in staff-generated descriptions.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What harmful or difficult content may be found in the National Archives Catalog and our web pages?

    Some items may:

    reflect racist, sexist, ableist, misogynistic/misogynoir, and xenophobic opinions and attitudes;
    be discriminatory towards or exclude diverse views on sexuality, gender, religion, and more;
    include graphic content of historical events such as violent death, medical procedures, crime, wars/terrorist acts, natural disasters and more;
    demonstrate bias and exclusion in institutional collecting and digitization policies.

    Why does the National Archives make potentially harmful content available?

    NARA’s mission is to preserve and provide access to the permanent records of the federal government. NARA, working in conjunction with diverse communities, will seek to balance the preservation of this history with sensitivity to how these materials are presented to and perceived by users.

    How is this material described, and why are some of the terms used in the descriptions harmful?

    Archivists choose what language to use when describing materials. Some of these descriptions were written many years ago, using language that was accepted at the time.

    Archivists often re-use language provided by creators or former owners of the material. This can provide important context, but it can also reflect biases and prejudices.
    Archivists often use a standardized set of terms, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, to describe materials. Some of these terms are outdated, offensive, or insensitive.
    In the past, the National Archives  has not had standards or policies to help archivists avoid harmful language.

    How are archivists working to address this problem and help users better understand such content?

    Examples include:

    informing users about the presence and origin of harmful content;
    revising descriptions and standardized sets of descriptive terms, supplementing description with more respectful terms, or creating new standardized terms to describe materials;
    researching the problem, listening to users, experimenting with solutions, and sharing our findings with each other;
    evaluating existing processes for exclusionary practices or institutional bias that prioritize one culture and/or group over another;
    making an institutional commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.

    How do I report potentially harmful language in archival descriptions in the Catalog?

    Please note: this process applies only to language found within Catalog descriptions of the records, not to the content of the original historical records. The National Archives does not alter the content of the original records.

    You can help us by reporting potentially harmful language that you see in archival descriptions in the National Archives Catalog.

    Email us at Catalog@nara.gov and include:

    the title of the description
    the National Archives Identifier (NAID) number
    a quote of the specific language you feel is harmful
    a suggested alternative if you have one

    NARA will determine whether or not we will change or remove terms from archival descriptions.  We will weigh potential harm against considerations such as input from affected communities, accurate preservation of the historical record, professional best practices, and allocation of staff resources.

    Consider their guiding principles:

    Guiding Principles for Reparative Description at NARA

    January 10, 2022

    The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) preserves and makes accessible the permanent records of the United States federal government. Archival records are the raw materials of history, and archivists’ work to make them publicly available can impact how events are remembered, whose stories are told, and which communities can find their experiences reflected in the national narrative. NARA’s records capture millions of stories across hundreds of years and their contents continue to have a real, direct impact on people’s lives. NARA’s records are the people’s records, and they should be equitably accessible.

    NARA has a responsibility to repair inequities through our archival descriptive practices; this work is known in the larger archives profession as reparative description. We are committed to working with staff, communities, and peer institutions to assess and contextualize or update harmful descriptions and to establish standards and policies to guide staff in future description work. In this work, we will be guided by the following principles:

    Transparency—We will find innovative ways to inform the public about the origin of our archival descriptions, including whether the language is original to the record’s creator or was written by NARA staff. Where feasible, we will maintain and make available old/outdated versions of descriptions. We will create simple, accessible ways for users to give feedback and we will publicly document our efforts on our website so that we can be held accountable and further maximize NARA’s value to all of our users.

    Language—We recognize the vastness of NARA’s holdings and descriptive metadata, and we commit to using innovative methods to find, assess, and repair descriptions with harmful terminology, valorizing terminology, and underdescription. We will seek to use individuals’ and communities’ preferred terminology, while recognizing that including outdated terminology in descriptions can provide researchers with important context and access points into historical records. We will work to alert users to such language and explain why archives workers have included it so we can truly make access happen for all.

    Institutional change—We commit to a deliberative and thoughtful approach to archival description (including appraisal, processing, re-processing, digitization, and cataloging) that allows for community collaboration and cultural humility. We recognize the years of hard work put into achieving past description goals and providing basic access to our holdings, as well as the efforts of individual archives workers across NARA to implement reparative description. We commit to supporting archives staff and building our future through our people as we ask for their time and expertise to move forward.
    Collaboration—We will listen to and seek ongoing input from marginalized people, colleagues within and outside of the archives field, and peer institutions about our descriptive practices. We will not only connect with our current users but also work to build and rebuild relationships with these communities through specifically acknowledging past wrongs, being transparent about our limitations, and following through on our commitments.

    Iterative/reflective process—We will commit to making reparative description an ongoing, iterative process, not a one-time project. We welcome and will seek to implement public, stakeholder, and staff feedback, and we will continuously reflect upon our process to identify ways to improve.

    Leadership—We acknowledge that people and organizations representing marginalized communities have led the archives profession in developing reparative description best practices, and we continue to learn from their work. We will seek to recognize their leadership and build on lessons learned as we work to fulfill NARA’s own potential as a leader for government archives in implementing large-scale reparative description.

  • Whistleblower: FBI Distorted Jan. 6 Cases into National ‘Domestic Violent Extremism’ Epidemic

    Whistleblower: FBI Distorted Jan. 6 Cases into National ‘Domestic Violent Extremism’ Epidemic

    Whistleblower: FBI Distorted Jan. 6 Cases into National ‘Domestic Violent Extremism’ Epidemic

    A whistleblower has accused the FBI’s Washington Field Office of using cases related to the January 6 U.S. Capitol riot to “overstate” the threat of “domestic violent extremism” in America, according to Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).

    The whistleblower alleged the FBI office did not follow standard investigative practices for the January 6 cases when it moved the cases to various local Field Offices around the country based on where the case subjects were from, Jordan revealed in a letter addressed to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Monday.

    January 6 cases “should all be officially led by the WFO [Washington Field Office] and categorized as WFO cases,” according to the letter, but instead, a “task force” dispatched instructions to open January 6 investigations to local field offices nationwide.

    Those local offices received the cases, making it look as if they were conducting the investigations on the cases, when, in reality, the Washington Field Office continued to conduct the bulk of the work, according to the letter.

    The whistleblower told Jordan:

    The manipulative casefile practice creates false and misleading crime statistics. Instead of hundreds of investigations stemming from a single, black swan incident at the Capitol, FBI and DOJ officials point to significant increases in domestic violent extremism and terrorism around the United States.

    Jordan noted in the letter, “Such an artificial case categorization scheme allows FBI leadership to misleadingly point to ‘significant’ increases in DVE threats nationwide,” which supports a narrative being perpetuated by the Biden administration.

    The whistleblower also alleged that January 6 cases were inappropriately taking priority over other cases, citing an instance of being “told that child sexual abuse material investigations were no longer an FBI priority and should be referred to local law enforcement agencies,” according to the letter.

    Read a copy of the letter below:

    January 6 by Ashley Oliver

    The whistleblower allegation comes after at least two other whistleblowers indicated to Jordan in July that FBI officials were pressuring agents to reclassify cases as domestic violent extremism despite there being limited evidence to do so.

    Jordan’s office clarified to Breitbart News that the latest revelation about January 6 cases specifically came from a new whistleblower, meaning at least three FBI whistleblowers have now come forward to Jordan about the FBI inflating domestic violent extremism case numbers.

    WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 21: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) speaks beside Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler (D-NY) as U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland appears before a House Judiciary Committee hearing at the U.S. Capitol on October 21, 2021 in Washington, DC. Garland is expected to give testimony about the status of the Justice Department's investigations into the January 6th attack on the Capitol. (Photo by Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)

    Rep. Jim Jordan speaks as U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland appears before a House Judiciary Committee hearing at the U.S. Capitol on October 21, 2021, in Washington, DC. (Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)

    In July, Breitbart News first reported that one of these whistleblowers accused embattled former Assistant Special Agent in Charge Timothy Thibault, who later resigned from the FBI, of being one of the senior officials at the agency who pressured agents to reclassify cases.

    Thibault is also under investigation for potentially violating the Hatch Act and has been accused by whistleblowers of shutting down a line of investigation into “derogatory Hunter Biden reporting” and of handling investigations, including those on election-related matters, inconsistently.

    Thibault retained legal counsel upon his resignation and released a statement through his counsel that denied some allegations against him while ignoring others.

    Jordan demanded numerous communications and other documents from Wray in Monday’s letter about the latest whistleblower allegation, although the Ohio Republican has repeatedly expressed dismay over the limited responses he has received from the FBI and Justice Department.

    Jordan, who is expected to serve as chair of the Judiciary Committee next year should Republicans take the majority, has vowed to investigate what he describes as the politicization of the FBI based in part on the well over a dozen whistleblower allegations he has fielded from the agency.

    via Breitbart

    September 20, 2022 at 06:58AM

  • Trump Calls For Death Penalty For Drug Dealers And Human Traffickers [VIDEO]

    President Donald J. Trump appeared in Youngstown to a very enthusiastic crowd and called for the Death Penalty for drug dealers after talking about a conversation with the leader who China who discussed their approach to drug crimes- instant execution.   Trump added he wanted the death penalty for Human Trafficking as well.

    “And I’m calling for the death penalty for drug dealers and human traffickers.We could reduce crime by 75% in one hour with this,” Trump said, also adding he wanted to fund police fully and hire more police- hinting his next administration would be about law and order.

    The comments were a highlight of the speech, with the left freaking out because Trump was talking about countries that executed drug dealers having low crime rates.

    The rally is a continuation of the “unprecedented effort to advance the MAGA agenda by energizing voters and highlighting America First candidates and causes,” according to a statement by Trump’s “Save America” Super PAC.

    One of those guest speakers was GOP Senate Candidate J.D. Vance who is currently squaring off against Democrat Tim Ryan in a race that could play a significant role in determining which political party controls the Senate next year.

  • The People’s Music ‘I Feel Good’: Underground Hip Hop Blazes Charts With Christian Conservative Values

    The People’s Music ‘I Feel Good’: Underground Hip Hop Blazes Charts With Christian Conservative Values

    Hip Hop artist Topher describes his music as the essence of that same kind of underground Hip Hop/ Old School tunes that was igniting populist political movements in the late 1970s and 1980s before the Music biz got ahold of it all and directed everything to the Marxist – Left.

    “What the Marxists are doing is what I call controlled demolition of our culture. They are controlling the fall of the American people and their families. Hip Hop was music to a lot of fatherless kids at a time when we were also losing a lot of leaders and hip hop became that leadership until it was taken over by horrible messages of the Marxists. Now we want to take that power back, and we are underground,” Topher said about the power of the new Christian patriotic Conservative rappers.

    Toper, an Airforce Veteran who served as Cryptologic Linguist with a specialty in Hebrew, is a part of a Christian patriotic Conservative hip hop movement, and he is about to drop another promised hit, “I Feel Good”, which will be available wherever tunes are sold on Sept 23.

    I Feel Good, Topher said is a song about why he feels good to be a Black American as he recalls the lessons his parents taught him about hard work and the opportunities in the US for hard workers like himself.

    In a recent social media post, Topher chimed in on something deeply offensive to him as a Dad of a little girl, as a Black American, and as a Patriot.

    About that Black Disney mermaid, he is not impressed:

    https://twitter.com/tophertownmusic/status/1570144102049787904?s=20&t=xP097wyECwlP6PmeBacgLw

    Topher talked about the dangerous concept of ‘worshiping skin color over Christ’ and of other people needing to see themselves represented in places before they believed they could do anything for themselves.

    “Can we ever escape racism and raise our children to believe in themselves and work hard for what they desire?” Topher said to me. “Blacks are not being helped by seeing a Black person in a movie. We have to want things for ourselves; that is what my Mom taught me. I made my own way, and that is the grassroots hip hop movement. We had the drive and got it done. The Communists have this idea of representation – meaning that the people have to see themselves to be able to do something. How can we be first doing anything- if we are stuck thinking we can’t do that thing- unless someone who looks like us hasn’t done it before,” he said.

    “How could Obama have been the first Black President if he had waited until someone Black had been President?” Topher said.

    That was the brilliant stuff you can expect from Topher in his tunes too. It is also what he taught his daughter when she wanted to be the little mermaid long before Disney got a Black mermaid.

    “Christ is my Lord and Savior and I think people need to be free and that is what these Christ -centered rappers are all about. I want people to know they can be conservatives and still make money and be good at their craft. We don’t need a label to be an artist and we don’t have to push anyone else’s agenda. You don’t have to give up your values,” Topher said, the man who purchased an expensive birthday party for his little mermaid daughter.

    https://twitter.com/tophertownmusic/status/1571170744666562561?s=20&t=xP097wyECwlP6PmeBacgLw

    “I wanted to give her a very special day and treat everyone well, so we fed everyone really well and had a great time, and my daughter was the little mermaid without needing anyone to tell her she could. She didn’t wait until she saw a Black woman doing it, ” he said about his daughter’s recent special day, which inspired the above post.

    With such huge mountains to climb to get his message about race, as a Black Conservative, how does Toper stay happy, I asked.

    “I rejoice in being alive and I feel happy and positive about the future. I want people to know if you feel bad, come on over here to our side and hear about why we feel better,” he said, encouraging a whole new audience of people to join him.

    Topher is a chart-topper too, which he says is just another opportunity to flip the bird to the music establishment who has censored rappers and other music artists like himself.

    Toper has some ideas that he has put in his music, it is sure to make get censor trigger happy but you can find him on Sept. 23 where tunes are sold.

    I feel happy is a great upbeat and positive tune.

    https://twitter.com/tophertownmusic/status/1570534911836311552?s=20&t=xP097wyECwlP6PmeBacgLw
  • ‘Look To The Father For How To Do Warfare’, Prayer From Trump’s OH Rally

    ‘Look To The Father For How To Do Warfare’, Prayer From Trump’s OH Rally

    President Donald J. Trump appeared in Youngstown, Ohio for a rousing rally to encourage voters to get out in the midterm election in November to support his America First candidates.

    The rally was started off with a prayer by Jeffrey Green, pastor of Touch, Heaven Church, which was well received.

    https://twitter.com/therealnroe/status/1571238548233232386?s=20&t=r0XivkrOkyy5P9J7p0CtIQ

    Good evening, everybody. God bless you. I know you’ve already been praying already but we’re going to pray together to start this great- great rally off.

    Gracious God, our Father, we come humbly before you today, recognizing that you are God and there is none other beside you. You said that when good men remain silent evil men will prevail.

    We repent, oh God. For those of us who might have been little silent and allowed some very evil intention to men to prevail against our nation, against our families, our children and against you, the Church Father, these men seek the confuse our children on gender pit us against each other by race. They also have cursed our nation with open borders where enemies are now able to come in and destroy with drugs. 

    Devices of all sorts of immorality. But You O Lord, are a shield and buckler, we look to you to show us how to do warfare for you said, Father, in your word, not by power, not by might, but by your spirit, saith the Lord. We come to you tonight on this historic and momentous occasion of the, let’s Save America rally to ask for your wisdom and your guidance and direction to reclaim this nation that’s was once dedicated to you.

    We declare today and say we claim it back. In the name of Jesus, the nation has been the foremost propagator of the Gospel, the kingdom message throughout the world. 

    Not the route. This Lord has two hours late. The day is dark. Shared your light on us. We, your people that we might, once again be the nation that stands for righteousness. The city on a hill that cannot be hidden. Like any Nation, we have not always done what was right. But we lifted up our faces and our voices to you, God, and you raised up a standard against that, which was it. As we seek your face now, a Lord help us to rise to this battle, for the soul of this nation, depending only on your love and power to overcome. We cannot do it by our strength, but by yours, but all things to be done by your spirit, Our God, you’re worth says, if my people who are called by my name, shall humble themselves and pray and turn from their wicked ways. 

    Then you will hear from heaven and forgive their sins and heal their land. Lord, we have been turning away. From anything that’s not like you. And we pray, Lord, Heal our land, lord heal our land that you are joining the upon this rally in, in the speakers and in the movement of stands for in the days to come, we will stand for. They know for they didn’t know their God shall do mightily and do exploits.

    We pray these things in the name of the father and the son, the Holy Spirit, which is all in total. The name of The name, which is above all names and everybody said, amen.

  • PRIVATE FUNDING OF ELECTIONS: How Real American Grassroots Activism Is Being Attacked By Political Pit Bulls

    PRIVATE FUNDING OF ELECTIONS: How Real American Grassroots Activism Is Being Attacked By Political Pit Bulls

    If you have noticed that American grassroots activism has become a frontline battle in politics, you may be a concerned citizen who has been attacked and pushed out of activism- by so-called ‘non profit’ grassroots groups. If you are the target of a smear campaign, fake news, misinformation, or lawfare and cancel culture- at the hands of an activist group- that pretends to care about the same issues you do- you may be over the target of a political pit bull protecting their fake grassroots group.

    POLITICAL ACTIVISM MASKED AS PHILANTHROPY

    KEY POINT: A new report identifies how to detect these groups saying, typically they emerge very suddenly in order to savage the political opposition on the policy or outrage of that particular day or week, then vanish just as quickly. The pop-ups do not file IRS disclosures or report their budgets, boards, or staff. 

    The Republican Party is somewhat new with grassroots activism compared to the left.

    A grassroots movement is one that uses the people in a given district, region or community as the basis for a political or economic movement. Grassroots movements and organizations use collective action from the local level to effect change at the local, regional, national or international level, and is really the only way left for concerned citizens to participate in civics.

    But what if grassroots activism has become just another way for foreign money, or for leftists to masquerade as MAGA, to get into our political process and turn the vote away from the America First movement?

    With the corruption of both political parties- and our elections owned by corporations, and the loss of authentic American legislative actions- what do the people have left?

    And if you noticed that both the Republican Party and the Democrat Party have partnered with very weird non profit activist groups, who seem to be working against the people, and have been very deceitful in their funding and in their legislative actions, and if they have caused massive infighting, you are not crazy- you may have found one of these groups.

    The following article really exposes the left, but these tactics are being used on the right now as well, and if you query concerned Moms and Dads in any community and ask them who is causing the infighting in the community, you will find your answer to who is threatening activism in that state.

    Consider this article from The Tablet Magazine that details the dark use of non profits to be political pitbulls:

    Behind the closed doors of an unassuming philanthropic consultancy in Washington, D.C., is one of the most powerful lobbying forces in the United States. The Atlantic has called it “the massive progressive dark-money group you’ve never heard of” and “the indisputable heavyweight of Democratic dark money.” 

    The Washington Post believes its potent lobbying arm is reason enough for Congress to enact forced donor disclosure laws, while Politico labeled it a “dark-money behemoth.” “The system of political financing, which often obscures the identities of donors, is known as dark money,” wrote The New York Times, “and Arabella’s network is a leading vehicle for it on the left.”

    Meet Arabella Advisors, the brainchild of ex-Clinton administration staffer Eric Kessler and the favorite tool of anonymous, billionaire donors on the progressive left. Since 2006, the Arabella hub has overseen a growing network of nonprofits—call them the “spokes”—that collected $2.4 billion in the 2019-20 election cycle, nearly twice as much as the Republican and Democratic national committees combined.

    These nonprofits in turn manage and supervise a vast array of “pop-up” groups—mainly political attack-dog websites, ad campaigns, and “spontaneous” demonstrations staffed by Arabella’s network of activist professionals who pose as members of independent activist organizations. These groups—such as Fix Our Senate, the Hub Project, and Floridians for a Fair Shake—typically emerge very suddenly in order to savage the political opposition on the policy or outrage of that particular day or week, then vanish just as quickly. The pop-ups do not file IRS disclosures or report their budgets, boards, or staff.

    In most cases, their connection to Arabella goes unreported. Many of them have offered sympathetic ordinary voters the opportunity to donate to whatever the “grassroots” cause happens to be, when in fact the money feeds back into Arabella’s enormous dark-money network.

    The relatively novel and innovative model of political activism perfected by Arabella, which was founded 2005, went more or less unnoticed until 2018, when I was reporting on the activist groups that attempted to prevent the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Among the sea of picket signs outside the court in July 2018 was the name of an unfamiliar group: Demand Justice. A search of the IRS nonprofit archives showed the name itself wasn’t listed. What did turn up in an online search was a downtown address on Connecticut Avenue shared by dozens of other organizations, including the Arabella “spoke” that appeared to be running Demand Justice, Sixteen Thirty Fund.

    Visit site for full article.

    HIDING POLITICAL AGENDA BEHIND “FAKE NEWS SITES”

    According to Influencial Watch, The nonprofit watchdog OpenSecrets (published by the Center for Responsive Politics) reported in May 2020 on Arabella’s involvement in numerous “fake news sites,” pouring millions of untraceable dollars into advertisements and other digital content “masquerading as news coverage to influence the 2020 election.” 

    OpenSecrets identified five Facebook pages (Colorado Chronicle, Daily CO, Nevada News Now, Silver State Sentinel, Verified Virginia) that “gave the impression of multiple free-standing local news outlets,” but are in fact “merely fictitious names used by the Sixteen Thirty Fund,” Arabella’s 501(c)(4) lobbying nonprofit. [64] These pages published Facebook political advertisements that favored Democrats and left-wing causes during the 2020 election. After the report was published a number of these pages were deleted.

    States Newsroom, which runs another network of left-wing “fake news” websites, was originally created as “Newsroom Network,” a project of the Arabella-run 501(c)(3) Hopewell Fund. In June 2019, States Newsroom was spun off as an independent nonprofit with its own 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, but a number of its local affiliates are used by the Hopewell Fund as its own legal aliases. [65]

    While States Newsroom does not disclose its donors (and is not required to by the IRS), [66]

    IRS application records obtained by OpenSecrets show the States Newsroom was offered a $1 million donation from the Wyss Foundation, a private foundation primarily funded by Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, who made his fortune as CEO of a controversial medical device manufacturer called Synthes.

    A financial statement in the IRS records obtained by OpenSecrets shows that the States Newsroom plans to bring in more than $27 million in contributions before the end of 2021.

    Do any of these details sound like a brand new nonprofit in your area?

  • Info Wars Owen Shroyer Will Retire From Media If Liberals Will Do This One Small Thing

    Info Wars Owen Shroyer Will Retire From Media If Liberals Will Do This One Small Thing

    Owen Shroyer has thrown down the gauntlet of media and issued a challenge to a liberal journalist who seems eager to come to blows over how bad info wars has been.

    Owen is offering to walk away from media for good- if anyone can beat him in a debate on his show.

    “And always, F— Info Wars,” Senior reporter for Huffington Post, Sebastian Murdock, reported from the courthouse during the trial of trailblazer Alex jones, which shows how out of control the left has become.

    Listen to leftist NPR describe the de-platforming of wildly popular Info Wars and the trial that threatens to change the face of free speech for the United States of America:

    “A fresh defamation trial for conspiracy theorist Alex Jones that began this week could offer slivers of insight into the effectiveness of “deplatforming” — the booting of undesirable accounts from social media sites.

    This trial, in Connecticut, is the second of three trials Jones faces for promoting lies on his streaming TV show and Infowars website that the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax. T

    Jones, a serial conspiracist and fabulist, was kicked off almost all major internet and social media platforms in 2018 after he threatened then-special counsel Robert Mueller, who was investigating then-President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. Initially, a round of media coverage touted flagging traffic to Jones’ websites as evidence that “deplatforming works.”

    The left loves de-platforming Consrvative journalists- let’s be honest. They also love talking ‘smackie’ about people who can not defend themselves- like this guy:

    BIG WORDS!!

    Murdock is an American journalist and he is feeling very tender at the moment about the trial of Alex Jones. Like the liberal he is, he was triggered by the sight of someone else practicing free speech and he wanted to sound off about it on a post on Twitter, where only liberals are allowed to have free with their speech, right?

    Check out his rant:

    https://twitter.com/SebastianMurdoc/status/1570863352272003073?s=20&t=bPG8wrFeVUwUpmlDm5ls0A

    Murdock was very passionate outside the courthouse where Jones stood trial, virtue signaling for his social media following how powerful he is while squishing a bumper sticker and then throwing it away.

    That is powerful media.

    Do you think such a brave man would accept a challenge to an actual debate on the topic of ‘Why Info Wars is so bad’?

    He could talk about all of his feelings. And squish more bumper stickers, no doubt.

    Owen Shroyer made such a challenge- and said so on his War Room show, on Friday, in response to the squishing of bumper stickers by the free speech hating Hufpo senior reporter:

    “This will be like a WWE retirement match. If Sebastian Murdock comes on the Infowars war room and defeats me in a debate, I will retire from the media.

    Sebastian Murdoch, who rips off infowar stickers in Connecticut outside of the courtroom and says F Infowars, is being challenged.

    If he’s not a coward and a fraud, I challenged him to come on this transmission for an hour-long debate. And if he defeats me, I will retire. I will quit. I will leave this post and I will no longer host a war room.

    Sebastian, there you go. Sebastian, you can retire me. All you have to do is show up in studio and defeat me to debate. We should be really easy for you, considering how smart you are compared to me.

    Especially, I’m just an idiot. So retire me Sebastian; you won’t do it. I guarantee. 

    I’d bet my life on it. You wouldn’t do it”. 

    It is the WWE Retirement Match! Owen said that he will retire from media forever if a liberal will go toe to toe with him in a one-hour debate about why Info Wars is so bad.

    The challenge has been made.

    WATCH THE FULL AND FORMAL INVITATION TO COME ON INFOWARS:

  • Left Proves They See DOJ And FBI As Their Private Henchmen Over Movement Of Illegals Into Blue States

    Left Proves They See DOJ And FBI As Their Private Henchmen Over Movement Of Illegals Into Blue States

    All of a sudden, this week, the left is very worried about the illegal migration and movement of unknown third-world people into the United States of America.

    DID YOU KNOW: That in 2016, before the open borders of Democrat Joe Biden, there were already an estimated 10 Million illegals in the USA, according to Pew Research? That number has grown massively- under the disaster, Democrats- and the left have applauded the invasion- until yesterday when migrants were moved into their elite enclaves.

    And the left is now – not happy.

    After dueling immigration escapades on Thursday; one in Florida compliments of Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, who moved migrants from his state of Florida- to Martha’s Vineyard, and the other thanks to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who moved migrants from Texas to Washington DC -all heck has broken loose, and the left is freaking out and showing how fragile they are.

    Martha’s Vinyard declared an emergency after 50 people entered the state looking for refuge.

    The Babylon Bee found the story and accurately had some fun with the freak-out:

    “MARTHA’S VINEYARD, MA — Residents of upscale Martha’s Vineyard are in a panic after several buses dropped off illegal immigrants from Florida this week. One terrified resident reportedly called the authorities after seeing Hispanic males outside her home, not even operating a leaf blower or any other kind of gardening equipment.

    “Hello, is this 911? Yes, there are brown-looking Latinx people outside my 20,000-square-foot seaside home, and they aren’t even carrying leaf blowers,” said a terrified Mavis McWhite to the dispatcher. “They aren’t even holding so much as a rake. They’re up to no good. I’m scared! Please send help!”

    But it is not funny to the fragile leftists.

    Some have even turned to demand Joe Biden and the DOJ do something about the invasion of their unique spaces. Stompy foot Governor Gavin Newsom had a temper tantrum- and put it on his official letterhead:

    Leftist Nikki Fried threw a temper tantrum as well- showing she cares about her state- when she can play politics. And what a genius! She is worried about ‘taxpayer funds.’ Who does she think is paying for the millions of migrants who are in the country now? Many of them are in her state.

    Proving that the left doesn’t care about the country- they care about themselves and their political power- and isn’t that what DeSantis and Abbott were trying to prove?

    And what did the left prove? They will beacon to the nation’s top law enforcement and national security agencies- as if the tax payer funded agencies are the personal Henchmen for the left.

    Have you seen enough to go vote these people out yet? Mid-terms are coming. Vote these Democrats out.